| Literature DB >> 35448894 |
Ernest Z Manson1, Mutinda C Kyama2, Josephine Kimani3, Aleksandra Bocian4, Konrad K Hus4, Vladimír Petrilla5,6, Jaroslav Legáth4,7, James H Kimotho8.
Abstract
Antivenom immunotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for snakebite envenoming. Most parts of the world affected by snakebite envenoming depend on broad-spectrum polyspecific antivenoms that are known to contain a low content of case-specific efficacious immunoglobulins. Thus, advances in toxin-specific antibodies production hold much promise in future therapeutic strategies of snakebite envenoming. We report anti-3FTxs monoclonal antibodies developed against N. ashei venom in mice. All the three test mAbs (P4G6a, P6D9a, and P6D9b) were found to be IgG antibodies, isotyped as IgG1. SDS-PAGE analysis of the test mAbs showed two major bands at approximately 55 and 29 kDa, suggestive of immunoglobulin heavy and light chain composition, respectively. The immunoaffinity-purified test mAbs demonstrated higher binding efficacy to the target antigen compared to negative control. Similarly, a cocktail of the test mAbs was found to induce a significantly higher inhibition (p-value < 0.0001) compared to two leading commercial brands of antivenoms on the Kenyan market, implying a higher specificity for the target antigen. Both the test mAbs and 3FTxs polyclonal antibodies induced comparable inhibition (p-value = 0.9029). The inhibition induced by the 3FTxs polyclonal antibodies was significantly different from the two antivenoms (p-value < 0.0001). Our results demonstrate the prospects of developing toxin-specific monoclonal-based antivenoms for snakebite immunotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: Naja ashei; inhibition ELISA; monoclonal antibodies; snakebite envenoming; three-finger toxins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35448894 PMCID: PMC9030397 DOI: 10.3390/toxins14040285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 5.075
Figure 1Immune response of Balb/c mice immunized with three-finger toxin antigen. Toxin was attenuated in 0.125% glutaradehyde, mixed with adjuvant, and administered intraperitoneally. Mice were bled in the tail vein for antibody titer determination and boosters administered every two weeks. T: mouse immunized with 50 µg inactivated antigen; LL: mouse immunized with 50 µg inactivated antigen; RL: mouse immunized with 100 µg inactivated antigen; and negative control: mouse immunized with PBS.
Figure 2Determination of immunoglobulin (IgG) yield of hybridoma clones. Antibodies were eluted in 1 mL fractions (a total of 10) per clone and immunoglobulin yield determined using the Qubit Protein Assay Kit.
Figure 3SDS-PAGE analysis of immunoaffinity-purified mAbs. Left lane—molecular weight marker (10–250 kDa); lane 1—clone P4G6a mAb; lane 2—clone P6D9a mAb; and lane 3—clone P6D9b mAb.
Figure 4ELISA titration of monoclonal antibody P4G6a. ELISA plate was coated with 1 µg/mL purified 3FTx antigen and incubated with serially diluted P4G6a monoclonal antibody (0.4320 to 0.0002). Pre-immune serum was used as negative control.
Figure 5ELISA titration of monoclonal antibody P6D9a. ELISA plate was coated with 1 µg/mL purified 3FTx antigen and incubated with serially diluted P6D9a monoclonal antibody (0.4220 to 0.0002). Pre-immune serum was used as negative control.
Figure 6ELISA titration of monoclonal antibody P6D9b. ELISA plate was coated with 1 µg/mL purified 3FTx antigen and incubated with serially diluted P6D9b monoclonal antibody (0.3260 to 0.0002). Pre-immune serum was used as negative control.
Figure 7Comparison of the inhibitory effect of a cocktail of purified test mAbs, selected commercial antivenoms, and mice polyclonal antibodies. Purified mAbs, VINSTM, and InoserpTM antivenoms and polyclonal antibodies were diluted two-fold and assayed. Sample antigen was serially diluted three-fold from 27 µg/mL to 0.04 µg/mL. * siginificant difference; ns: difference not statistically significant.