| Literature DB >> 35448768 |
Zhouli Liu1, Qinglin Chen2, Maosen Lin3, Mengdi Chen4, Cong Zhao5, Qingxuan Lu1, Xiangyu Meng1.
Abstract
The multi-system of electro-phytotechnology using a woody ornamental cadmium (Cd) hyperaccumulator (Lonicera japonica Thunb.) is a new departure for environmental remediation. The effects of four electric field conditions on Cd accumulation, growth, and photosynthesis of L. japonica under four Cd treatments were investigated. Under 25 and 50 mg L-1 Cd treatments, Cd accumulation in L. japonica was enhanced significantly compared to the control and reached 1110.79 mg kg-1 in root and 428.67 mg kg-1 in shoots influenced by the electric field, especially at 2 V cm-1, and with higher bioaccumulation coefficient (BC), translocation factor (TF), removal efficiency (RE), and the maximum Cd uptake, indicating that 2 V cm-1 voltage may be the most suitable electric field for consolidating Cd-hyperaccumulator ability. It is accompanied by increased root and shoots biomass and photosynthetic parameters through the electric field effect. These results show that a suitable electric field may improve the growth, hyperaccumulation, and photosynthetic ability of L.japonica. Meanwhile, low Cd supply (5 mg L-1) and medium voltage (2 V cm-1) improved plant growth and photosynthetic capacity, conducive to the practical application to a plant facing low concentration Cd contamination in the real environment.Entities:
Keywords: Lonicera japonica Thunb.; cadmium; electric fields; hyperaccumulator; phytoremediation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35448768 PMCID: PMC9030930 DOI: 10.3390/plants11081040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1The electrical setting of the experiment.
Various experimental treatments.
| Treatment | Test Number | Voltage Gradient (V cm−1) | Cd Concentration in the Medium (mg L−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | V0-Cd0 | 0 | 0 |
| T2 | V0-Cd5 | 0 | 5 |
| T3 | V0-Cd25 | 0 | 25 |
| T4 | V0-Cd50 | 0 | 50 |
| T5 | V1-Cd0 | 1 | 0 |
| T6 | V1-Cd5 | 1 | 5 |
| T7 | V1-Cd25 | 1 | 25 |
| T8 | V1-Cd50 | 1 | 50 |
| T9 | V2-Cd0 | 2 | 0 |
| T10 | V2-Cd5 | 2 | 5 |
| T11 | V2-Cd25 | 2 | 25 |
| T12 | V2-Cd50 | 2 | 50 |
| T13 | V3-Cd0 | 3 | 0 |
| T14 | V3-Cd5 | 3 | 5 |
| T15 | V3-Cd25 | 3 | 25 |
| T16 | V3-Cd50 | 3 | 50 |
Figure 2The relationship of different treatments and Cd contents in roots and shoots of L. japonica. Values represent the mean.
The effect of electric field on Cd hyperaccumulation characteristics of L. japonica.
| Treatment | Test Number | Root BC | Shoots BC | TF | RE | Uptake (μg plant−1 day−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | V0-Cd0 | — | — | — | — | — |
| T2 | V0-Cd5 | 20.74 a | 6.74 ab | 0.33 a | 14.02 ab | 5.43 abc ± 0.04 |
| T3 | V0-Cd25 | 13.04 b | 3.72 c | 0.29 bc | 7.39 c | 10.68 d ± 0.08 |
| T4 | V0-Cd50 | 13.15 b | 3.51 d | 0.27 d | 6.87 d | 14.68 ef ± 0.06 |
| T5 | V1-Cd0 | — | — | — | — | — |
| T6 | V1-Cd5 | 31.85 cd | 7.94 cde | 0.25 b | 18.18 ef | 8.95 de ± 0.05 |
| T7 | V1-Cd25 | 18.92 e | 7.27 ab | 0.38 a | 15.37 ab | 20.86 g ± 0.12 |
| T8 | V1-Cd50 | 18.61 e | 5.40 e | 0.29 bc | 10.77 g | 19.18 gh ± 0.23 |
| T9 | V2-Cd0 | — | — | — | — | — |
| T10 | V2-Cd5 | 57.93 ef | 13.73 cdef | 0.24 b | 33.36 h | 18.46 ghi ± 0.11 |
| T11 | V2-Cd25 | 44.43 g | 13.17 de | 0.30 a | 29.56 i | 53.02 j ± 0.38 |
| T12 | V2-Cd50 | 32.16 cd | 8.57 abc | 0.27 cd | 17.92 efgh | 16.36 abcd ± 0.15 |
| T13 | V3-Cd0 | — | — | — | — | — |
| T14 | V3-Cd5 | 65.81 h | 17.10 g | 0.26 b | 36.78 jk | 17.80 fg ± 0.09 |
| T15 | V3-Cd25 | 51.68 efg | 13.56 def | 0.26 b | 27.92 hi | 50.27 ijk ± 0.40 |
| T16 | V3-Cd50 | 33.85 cd | 8.11 ab | 0.24 bcd | 16.02 abc | 14.55 cdef ± 0.07 |
Data are means ± SD. BC: the bioaccumulation coefficient; TF: the translocation factor; RE: the removal efficiency. Different letters indicate significant differences at the 5% level according to the LSD test. “—” Unavailable under the tested concentrations.
Figure 3The effect of electric field on root and shoots biomass dry weight (g) of L. japonica. Values represent mean ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences at the 5% level according to the LSD test.
Figure 4The effect of electric field on net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci). Values represent the mean.