| Literature DB >> 35448643 |
Mohamed E Sadek1, Yasser M Shabana1, Khaled Sayed-Ahmed2, Ayman H Abou Tabl1.
Abstract
Nanoparticles (NPs) have attracted great interest in various fields owing to their antimicrobial activity; however, the use of NPs as fungicides on plants has not been sufficiently investigated. In this study, the antifungal activities of sulfur nanoparticles (S-NPs) and copper nanoparticles (Cu-NPs) prepared by a green method were evaluated against Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. The formation of NPs was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD). The antifungal activities of NPs (5-100 µg/mL), CuSO4 (4000 µg/mL), and micro sulfur (MS) were compared to those of the recommended chemical fungicide Topsin-M 70 WP at a dose of 1000 µg/mL. They were evaluated in vitro and then in vivo at different temperatures (10 and 20 °C) on cucumber (Cucumis sativus) fruits. The total phenolic content (TPC) and total soluble solids (TSS) were determined to study the effects of various treatments on the shelf life of cucumber fruits, compared to untreated cucumber as a positive control. The diameters of S-NPs and Cu-NPs ranged from 10 to 50 nm, and 2 to 12 nm, respectively. The results revealed that S-NPs exhibited the highest antifungal activity, followed by Cu-NPs. However, CuSO4 showed the lowest antifungal activity among all treatments. The antifungal activity of the prepared NPs increased with the increase in NP concentration, while the fungal growth was less at low temperature. The cytotoxicity of the prepared NPs was evaluated against the WI-38 and Vero cell lines in order to assess their applicability and sustainability. S-NPs caused less cytotoxicity than Cu-NPs.Entities:
Keywords: Botrytis cinerea; Cu-NPs; S-NPs; Sclerotinia sclerotiorum; antifungal activity; cucumber; cytotoxicity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35448643 PMCID: PMC9028826 DOI: 10.3390/jof8040412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1TEM micrographs of (a) Cu-NPs, (b) S-NPs, (c) Cu-NPs histogram, and (d) S-NPs histogram.
Figure 2XRD patterns of prepared (a) S-NPs and (b) Cu-NPs.
Effect of Cu-NPs and S-NPs at different concentrations on B. cinerea and S. sclerotiorum growth on PDA.
| Treatment | Concentration | % Growth Inhibition | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| S-NPs | 5 | 76.47 f | 54.89 k |
| 10 | 78.82 e | 72.18 i | |
| 25 | 80.00 d | 83.08 e | |
| 50 | 88.24 c | 88.72 d | |
| 75 | 90.98 b | 90.60 c | |
| 100 | 94.12 a | 94.36 a | |
| Cu-NPs | 5 | 3.92 n | 8.27 o |
| 10 | 13.73 k | 13.53 n | |
| 25 | 23.53 j | 34.21 l | |
| 50 | 47.06 i | 63.91 j | |
| 75 | 80.39 d | 71.80 i | |
| 100 | 94.12 a | 92.48 b | |
| CuSO4 | 4000 | 58.82 g | 77.44 g |
| Micro sulfur (MS) | 1000 | 58.04 h | 82.33 f |
| Topsin-M 70 WP | 1000 | 9.80 m | 75.56 h |
| PVP (3 g/100 mL) | 11.76 l | 15.41 m | |
a–o Means with the same letter within the same column are not significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p = 0.05).
Figure 3The antifungal activities of PVP (3 g/100 mL), MS (1000 µg/mL), CuSO4 (4000 µg/mL), Topsin-M (1000 µg/mL), S-NPs (50 and 100 µg/mL), and Cu-NPs (50 and 100 µg/mL) against B. cinerea and S. sclerotiorum.
Effect of Cu-NPs and S-NPs at different concentrations on disease incidence (DI) and disease severity (DS) caused by B. cinerea and S. sclerotiorum on cucumber fruits incubated at two temperature levels (10 and 20 °C). a* DI was calculated six days after inoculation according to the following formula.
| Treatment | Conc. |
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C | 20 °C | 10 °C | 20 °C | ||||||
| DI a* | DS b* | DI | DS | DI | DS | DI | DS | ||
| Cu-NPs | 50 | 75 ab c* | 0.50 bc | 75 ab | 1 bcd | 0 b | 0 b | 50 a | 0.5 b |
| 100 | 25 ab | 0.25 bc | 50 ab | 0.5 cd | 0 b | 0 b | 50 a | 0.5 b | |
| S-NPs | 25 | 75 ab | 0.75 bc | 75 ab | 1.25 bc | 0 b | 0 b | 50 a | 0.5 b |
| 50 | 50 ab | 0.50 bc | 75 ab | 0.75 cd | 0 b | 0 b | 25 a | 0.25 b | |
| CuSO4 | 4000 | 100 a | 1 b | 100 a | 2 b | 0 b | 0 b | 50 a | 1 b |
| Micro sulfur (MS) | 1000 | 100 a | 1 b | 100 a | 1.25 bc | 25 ab | 0.25 ab | 50 a | 0.5 b |
| Positive control c* | 100 a | 1.75 a | 100 a | 4 a | 100 a | 1 a | 75 a | 3 a | |
a DI (%) = (number of infected cucumber/total number of cucumber assessed) × 100. b DS was determined as lesion length (cm) after 6 days [31].c Cucumber fruits were inoculated with pathogens only (without antifungal treatments). a–d Means with the same letter within the same column are not significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p = 0.05).
Figure 4Effect of Cu-NPs and S-NPs at two concentrations (50 and 100 µg/mL) on disease incidence (DI) and disease severity (DS) caused by B. cinerea and S. sclerotiorum on cucumber fruits incubated at 20 °C in comparison with microsulfur (MS) (1000 µg/mL) and CuSO4 (4000 µg/mL). NC = negative control (cucumber fruits were dipped into sterile distilled water for 10 min); PC = positive control (cucumber fruits were inoculated with pathogens but without antifungal treatments).
Effect of Cu-NPs and S-NPs at different concentrations on the total phenolic (TPC) and total soluble solids (TSS) contents in cucumber fruits inoculated with B. cinerea and S. sclerotiorum.
| Treatment | Concentration |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPC | TSS | TPC | TSS | ||
| Cu-NPs | 50 | 0.137 c | 2.0 e | 0.174 a | 3.0 d |
| 100 | 0.152 a | 3.8 b | 0.169 a | 3.4 c | |
| S-NPs | 25 | 0.064 f | 3.9 a | 0.109 d | 3.3 c |
| 50 | 0.066 f | 3.0 d | 0.108 d | 3.56 b | |
| CuSO4 | 4000 | 0.141 b | 3.2 c | 0.093 d | 3.0 d |
| Microsulfur | 1000 | 0.104 e | 3.0 d | 0.108 d | 3.4 c |
| Positive control a* | 0.143 b | 0.7 f | 0.146 b | 2.8 e | |
| Negative control b* | 0.129 d | 4.0 a | 0.129 c | 4.0 a | |
a Cucumber fruits were inoculated with pathogens only (without antifungal treatments).b Healthy cucumber fruits were sprayed only with sterile distilled water. a–f Means with the same letter(s) within the same column are not significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p = 0.05).
Cytotoxicity levels of S-NPS and Cu-NPs on WI-38 and Vero cells.
| Tested NPs | Concentration (µg/mL) | WI 38 Cells | Vero Cells | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viability (%) | Cytotoxicity (%) | Viability (%) | Cytotoxicity (%) | ||
| S-NPs | 25 | 79.45 c | 20.55 c | 95.4 b | 4.60 e |
| 12.5 | 98.48 a | 1.52 e | 99 a | 1.00 f | |
| 6.25 | 98.98 a | 1.02 e | 99.14 a | 0.86 f | |
| 2.5 | 99.77 a | 0.23 e | 99.62 a | 0.38 f | |
| 1.25 | 100 a | 0.00 e | 100 a | 0.00 f | |
| 0.625 | 100 a | 0.00 e | 100 a | 0.00 f | |
| Cu-NPs | 25 | 6.81 e | 93.19 a | 11.24 f | 88.76 a |
| 12.5 | 32.52 d | 67.48 b | 15.02 e | 84.98 b | |
| 6.25 | 91.55 b | 8.45 d | 16.02 d | 83.98 c | |
| 2.5 | 98.82 a | 1.18 e | 60.99 c | 39.01 d | |
| 1.25 | 99.09 a | 0.91 e | 99.2 a | 0.80 f | |
| 0.625 | 99.18 a | 0.82 e | 100 a | 0.00 f | |
a–f Means with the same letter(s) within the same column are not significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p = 0.05).
Figure 5Effects of S-NPs and Cu-NPs at different concentrations on (a) WI-38 cells and (b) Vero cell viability.