| Literature DB >> 35448598 |
Mousa A Alghuthaymi1, Kamel A Abd-Elsalam2, Hussien M AboDalam3, Farah K Ahmed4, Mythili Ravichandran5, Anu Kalia6, Mahendra Rai7.
Abstract
Traditional nanoparticle (NP) synthesis methods are expensive and generate hazardous products. It is essential to limit the risk of toxicity in the environment from the chemicals as high temperature and pressure is employed in chemical and physical procedures. One of the green strategies used for sustainable manufacturing is microbial nanoparticle synthesis, which connects microbiology with nanotechnology. Employing biocontrol agents Trichoderma and Hypocrea (Teleomorphs), an ecofriendly and rapid technique of nanoparticle biosynthesis has been reported in several studies which may potentially overcome the constraints of the chemical and physical methods of nanoparticle biosynthesis. The emphasis of this review is on the mycosynthesis of several metal nanoparticles from Trichoderma species for use in agri-food applications. The fungal-cell or cell-extract-derived NPs (mycogenic NPs) can be applied as nanofertilizers, nanofungicides, plant growth stimulators, nano-coatings, and so on. Further, Trichoderma-mediated NPs have also been utilized in environmental remediation approaches such as pollutant removal and the detection of pollutants, including heavy metals contaminants. The plausible benefits and pitfalls associated with the development of useful products and approaches to trichogenic NPs are also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Hypocrea; Trichoderma; beneficial microbes; biocontrol agents; nanostructures
Year: 2022 PMID: 35448598 PMCID: PMC9027617 DOI: 10.3390/jof8040367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1The top ten Trichoderma species used to produce safe metal nanoparticles through mycogenic synthesis.
Figure 2Trichoderma applications in the agricultural ecosystem. Red circle indicates stopping of the heavy metal contamination through active removal by nanomaterials. This figure was created with BioRender software.
Figure 3Schematic illustration of biosynthesis mechanism of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) using Trichoderma species. The present figure was created by BioRender.com.
Trichoderma species employed for green synthesis metal nanoparticles.
| NPs | Size | Shape | Application | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| AgNPs | 13–18 nm | crystalline nature | Biomolecular detection | [ |
|
| AgNPs | 5–50 nm | variable morphology | Preparing many nanostructured materials and devices | [ |
|
| AgNPs | 8–60 nm | round and uniform in shape | Crop protection | [ |
|
| AgNPs | 10–51 nm | face centered cubic symmetry particles | Antioxidant properties and antibacterial activity | [ |
|
| AgNPs | 10–20 nm | oval shaped, crystalline in nature | Mosquito control | [ |
|
| AgNPs | 1–50 nm | globular particles | Antibacterial effect against human pathogenic bacteria | [ |
|
| AgNPs | 20–30 nm | spherical | Control of | [ |
|
| AgNPs | 5–25 nm | spherical | Control of many phytopathogenic fungi | [ |
|
| AgNPs | 15–25 nm | anisotropic structural | Antioxidant and antibacterial against clinical pathogens | [ |
|
| AgNP-TS | 57.02 ± 1.75 nm | different characteristics | Control of | [ |
| AgNP-T | 81.84 ± 0.67 nm | ||||
|
| AgNPs | 1–4 nm | crystal phase | carriers of biologically active molecules | [ |
| AgNPs | 5–11 ± 0·5 nm | spherical, triangular, and cuboid | Control of industrial microbes | [ | |
| AgNPs | 14–25 nm | round | Antibacterial | [ | |
| AgNPs | 5–50 nm | spherical and oval with smooth surfaces | Control of | [ | |
|
| AgNPs | 10–15 nm | spherical | Control of pathogenic bacteria and fungi | [ |
| AgNPs | 59.66 ± 4.18 nm | spherical | Control of | [ | |
|
| AgNPs | 72 nm | cubic crystal structure | Antioxidant properties and antibacterial activity | [ |
| ZnONPs | 12–35 nm | crystal structure | Control of Bacterial Leaf Blight causative in rice | [ | |
| ZnONPs | 30.34 nm | spherical | Antibacterial activity | [ | |
|
| ZnONPs | 8–23 nm | hexagonal, spherical and rod | fungicidal action against three soil–cotton pathogenic fungi | [ |
|
| CuONPs | 10–190 nm | spherical | development of anticancer nanotherapeutics | [ |
|
| CuONPs | ~20 nm | spherical structure | Antibacterial activity | [ |
|
| AgNPs | 5–18 nm | spherical | Control of plant pathogens | [ |
| CuONPs | 38–77 nm | Dispersed and elongated fibers in shape | |||
| ZnONPs | 27–40 nm in width | fan and bouquet structure | Control of microorganisms | ||
| 134–200 nm in length | |||||
| CuONPs | 5–25 nm | spherical | Management of some tea plantation diseases | [ | |
| SiO2NPs | 12–22 nm | ||||
|
| SeNPs | 49.5–312.5 nm | hexagonal, near-spherical, and irregular | Control of | [ |
| SeNPs | bigger than traditional SNP | irregular | antifungal | [ | |
| SeNPs | An average of 147.1 nm | spherical and pseudo-spherical | ND | [ | |
|
| AuNPs | 20–30 nm | spherical | bioremediation | [ |
|
| Chitosan NPs | 89.03 nm | nearly spherical | Control of soil borne pathogens | [ |
| SiO2NPs | 89 nm | oval, rod, and cubical | Bioremediation | [ | |
|
| iron oxide NPs | 207 ± 2 nm (α-Fe2O3) | Spherical shape | Control of | [ |
Figure 4Various potential applications of Trichoderma-mediated nanoparticles in agroecosystems. The present figure was created by BioRender.com.
Figure 5The adsorption and absorption mechanisms in the cell walls caused by the presence of functional groups, proteins, or compounds that serve as chelating agents, as well as the accumulation of these in the vacuoles, are illustrated schematically in the Trichoderma tolerance mechanisms to micro- and nano-metals. Mechanisms involving antioxidant enzyme activity that reduces the damage produced by reactive oxygen species may also be present. The arrows indicate movement of the metal ions or nanoparticles affecting specific organelle in the cell. The present figure was created by BioRender.com.