| Literature DB >> 35448328 |
Denghua Li1,2,3, Ganqiong Li1,2, Jianzheng Li1,3, Shiwei Xu1,2,3.
Abstract
Real-time noninvasive monitoring of crop water information is an important basis for water-saving irrigation and precise management. Nano-electronic technology has the potential to enable smart plant sensors to communicate with electronic devices and promote the automatic and accurate distribution of water, fertilizer, and medicine to improve crop productivity. In this work, we present a new flexible graphene oxide (GO)-based noninvasive crop water sensor with high sensitivity, fast responsibility and good bio-interface compatibility. The humidity monitoring sensitivity of the sensor reached 7945 Ω/% RH, and the response time was 20.3 s. We first present the correlation monitoring of crop physiological characteristics by using flexible wearable sensors and photosynthesis systems, and have studied the response and synergistic effect of net photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate of maize plants under different light environments. Results show that in situ real-time sensing of plant transpiration was realized, and the internal water transportation within plants could be monitored dynamically. The synergistic effect of net photosynthetic rate and transpiration of maize plants can be jointly tested. This study provides a new technical method to carry out quantitative monitoring of crop water in the entire life cycle and build smart irrigation systems. Moreover, it holds great potential in studying individual plant biology and could provide basic support to carry out precise monitoring of crop physiological information.Entities:
Keywords: crop water; graphene oxide; monitoring; noninvasive; sensor
Year: 2022 PMID: 35448328 PMCID: PMC9026295 DOI: 10.3390/membranes12040358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Figure 1Schematic of the structure of the flexible devices.
Figure 2SEM micrographs of the sensitive films. (a,b) top-view surface micrographs; (c,d) cross section micrographs.
Figure 3Impedance versus RH properties of the GO-based sensor. The insert is the impedance–RH curves displayed in logarithmic coordinates.
Figure 4Hysteresis characteristic of the GO-based sensor at 100 Hz.
Figure 5Dynamic response–recovery curves of RH sensitivity of the GO-based sensor at room temperature.
Figure 6Complex impedance plots of the GO-based sensor at (a) RH values from 11–95%, (b) RH values from 75–95%. ImZ: imaginary part of complex impedance; ReZ: real part of complex impedance.
Figure 7(a) Time for water to reach different leaves from the roots after irrigation; (b) plant morphology before irrigation; (c) plant morphology after irrigation.
Figure 8(a) Impedance variation of the GO-based sensor attached to a leaf surface as response to light intensity over time; (b) measurements of the sensor attached to the lower surface of a leaf under different light irradiation intensities.
Figure 9Transpiration rate (Trmmol) and net photosynthetic rate (Photo) of a crop leaf as response to light irradiation intensity.
Figure 10Impedance and transpiration rate (Trmmol) response of GO-based sensor under different irradiation intensities.