| Literature DB >> 35448303 |
Li Guo1, Jing Huang1, Yaxin Chen1, Bohan Zhang1, Minbiao Ji1,2.
Abstract
Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) is known to gain coherent amplification of molecular vibrations that allow for rapid and label-free chemical imaging in the microscopy setting. However, the tightly focused laser spot has limited the detection sensitivity, partly due to the tiny interaction volume. Here, we report the use of metal-lined hollow-core fiber (MLHCF) to improve the sensitivity of SRS in sensing dilute solutions by extending the light-matter interaction volume through the fiber waveguide. With a focusing lens (100 mm FL) and 320 μm diameter fiber, we demonstrated an optimum enhancement factor of ~20 at a fiber length of 8.3 cm. More importantly, the MLHCF exhibited a significantly suppressed cross-phase modulation (XPM) background, enabling the detection of ~0.7 mM DMSO in water. Furthermore, the relationship between fiber length and SRS signal could be well explained theoretically. The fiber-enhanced SRS (FE-SRS) method may be further optimized and bears potential in the sensitive detection of molecules in the solution and gas phases.Entities:
Keywords: biosensing; fiber enhanced; spectroscopy; stimulated Raman scattering
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35448303 PMCID: PMC9028131 DOI: 10.3390/bios12040243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1Experimental design: (A) energy diagram of stimulated Raman scattering (SRS); (B) illustration of the laser intensity changes as a result of stimulated Raman loss (SRL) and stimulated Raman gain (SRG); (C) optical layout of the fiber-enhanced stimulated Raman scattering setup. EOM: electro-optic modulator; MLHCF: metal-lined hollow-core fiber; BP: bandpass filter; PD: photodiode; LIA: lock-in amplifier.
Figure 2(A) Spontaneous Raman and SRS spectra of ethanol at ~881 cm−1; (B) SRS spectra of ethanol with different fiber lengths; (C) the normalized experimental data versus the theoretical prediction of the relationship between the SRS peak intensity and the fiber length; (D) the experimental data and the theoretical prediction for the fractional change of SRS to the fiber length.
Figure 3(A) Raw SRS spectra of ethanol with different concentrations for measurements in the cuvette; (B) background-corrected SRS spectra of ethanol with different concentrations for measurements in the cuvette; (C) background-removed SRS spectra (881 cm−1) of ethanol with different concentrations via 8.3 cm long MLHCF; (D) SRS spectra of 1.72 M ethanol from the cuvette and the 8.3 cm fiber.
Figure 4(A) Original SRS spectra of DMSO/water solutions in the cuvette with different concentrations; (B) background-corrected SRS spectra of DMSO/water solutions in the cuvette with different concentrations; (C) background-corrected SRS spectra (2915 cm−1) of DMSO with different concentrations via MLHCF with a length of 8.3 cm; (D) SRS spectra of 704 mM DMSO from the cuvette and the 8.3 cm fiber.