| Literature DB >> 35448272 |
Jia Zhang1,2,3, Liwei Xu1,2,3, Xinxin Xu1,2,3, Xiaoling Wu1,2,3, Hua Kuang1,2,3, Chuanlai Xu1,2,3.
Abstract
Mycotoxin pollution is widespread in cereal, which greatly threatens food security and human health. In this study, the migration and transformation of sterigmatocystin (STG) mycotoxin during the contaminated rice wine processing was systematically assessed. QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) coupled with ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was firstly established for STG analysis in rice wine. It was found that high levels of rice leaven caused a significant reduction in STG in the fermented rice and wine, which was mainly due to the adsorption of yeast cells and Rhizopus biological degradation. However, compared with rice, the levels of STG in separated fermented wine was significantly decreased by 88.6%, possibly attributed to its high log Kow (3.81) and low water solubility (1.44 mg/L). The metabolites of STG (i.e., monohydroxy STG) were identified in rice wine fermentation for the first time. Moreover, STG disturbed the metabolic profile rice wine composition mainly by glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, purine metabolism pathway, particularly with regard to eight amino acids and sixteen lipids. This study elucidated the STG migration and transformation mechanism during the rice wine processing. The finding provided new analytical method for mycotoxin exposure and pollutant in food production, which may support agricultural production and food security.Entities:
Keywords: UPLC–MS/MS; food processing; metabolites; migration and transformation; mycotoxin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35448272 PMCID: PMC9028121 DOI: 10.3390/bios12040212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1(A) The processed step of rice wine. The samples highlighted in green were used for mycotoxin analysis. (B) Changes of STG absolute content (μg) in each procedure during rice wine production.
Linear range (μg/L), regression equation, calibration curve coefficients (R2), Matrix effects (ME), Limit of detection (LOD) and Limit of quantitation (LOQ) for STG in rice wine products. Recoveries and RSDs of sterigmatocystin in rice wine products at different spiked levels (n = 5).
| Mycotoxin | Matrix | Linear Range | Regression Equation | R2 | ME/% | LOD (μg/kg) | LOQ (μg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STG | Solvent | 5–200 | y = 190,442x + 268,234 | 0.9953 | |||
| Soaked rice | 5–200 | y = 176,167x + 236,281 | 0.9979 | −7.0 | 0.01 | 0.03 | |
| Steamed rice | 5–200 | y = 179,674x + 238,395 | 0.9969 | −6.0 | 0.01 | 0.03 | |
| Fermented rice | 5–200 | y = 208,146x + 392,325 | 0.9959 | +9.0 | 0.01 | 0.03 | |
| Fermented wine | 5–200 | y = 256,280x + 565,254 | 0.9910 | +35.0 | 0.07 | 0.25 | |
| Sample | 20 μg/kg | 100 μg/kg | 200 μg/kg | ||||
| Recoveries (%) | RSD (%) | Recoveries (%) | RSD (%) | Recoveries (%) | RSD (%) | ||
| Soaked rice | 102 | 2.3 | 107 | 2.3 | 119 | 2.4 | |
| Steamed rice | 77 | 6.2 | 85 | 8.7 | 112 | 3.5 | |
| Fermented rice | 118 | 2.1 | 118 | 7.6 | 116 | 6.9 | |
| Fermented wine | 73 | 3.6 | 105 | 5.0 | 119 | 4.3 | |
Changes of STG level in spiked samples in different steam time, fermentation time and rice leaven addition level during the rice wine production (mean, n = 3).
| Sample | Rice | Washed Rice | Soaked Rice | Steam Rice | Fermented Rice-1 g | Fermented Rice-3 g | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 min | 25 min | 35 min | 12 h | 36 h | 84 h | 12 h | 36 h | 84 h | ||||
| Level/(μg/kg) | 986.1 | 822.3 * | 750.8 * | 738.8 a | 733.2 a | 737.7 a | 594.8 *,a | 711.6 *,b | 913.1 *,c | 592.8 *,a | 712.3 *,b | 858.1 *,c |
| SD | 16.4 | 39.8 | 14.4 | 16.2 | 46.4 | 37.1 | 60.8 | 32.3 | 23.6 | 36.8 | 78.4 | 17.7 |
| Sample | Fermented rice-9g | Separated fermented wine | Separated fermented rice | Total rice wine | ||||||||
| 12 h | 36 h | 84 h | 1 g | 3 g | 9 g | 1 g | 3 g | 9 g | 1 g | 3 g | 9 g | |
| Level/(μg/kg) | 586.6 *,a | 736.7 *,b | 818.5 *,c | 169 a | 126.2 b | 112.2 c | 1214.1 a | 1164.9 a | 956.0 b | 925.4 | 850.6 | 613.4 * |
| SD | 74.9 | 19.4 | 58.3 | 2 | 5.5 | 3.9 | 43.1 | 108.4 | 39.0 | |||
Note: * Indicates a significant difference of STG in rice wine product of the step versus the prior step (p < 0.05), as determined by Student’s t-test. a,b,c The different letters show a remarkable difference (p < 0.05) between the effects of the different factors in same processing; conversely, the same letter shows no significant difference observed. Fermented rice-1 g: the 1 g level of rice leaven during rice wine production, all else follows.
Figure 2(A) The STG level in fermented rice of different fermentation time (12 h, 36 h, 84 h) during rice wine production (1g, 3g, and 9g mean different rice leaven levels); (B) the STG level of fermented wine and fermented rice after complete separation; (C) correlation of STG level between the original soaked rice and final rice wine product. Data are expressed as means ± standard error of means (n = 3). * Error bars represent the standard deviation. * Indicates a significant difference of STG content in rice wine product of the step versus the prior step, (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01), as determined by Student’s t-test.
Figure 3(A) Chromatograms of metabolite of STG found in rice wine product; (B,C) HRMS/MS spectra of metabolites of STG found in rice wine product.
Figure 4(A) PLS-DA score plot of STG exposure rice wine in positive and negative mode results (C, L, and H mean control group, low, and high level STG group); (B) pathway impact analysis showing changing metabolism in rice wine treated with STG compared to normal rice wine; (C) based on UPLC–HRMS/MS system identified, a heat map of identified metabolites in rice wine with varied STG levels exposure by hierarchical clustering of the most significantly differential metabolites in rice wine (p < 0.05 and VIP > 1.0).