| Literature DB >> 35447817 |
Spiros D Dafnis1, Sofia Gounari2, Chris E Zotos1, George K Papadopoulos1.
Abstract
Climate change is considered a major factor affecting honeybees' behavior and productivity with major consequences in both honey and agricultural production. Many research studies have expressed serious concerns about the mass losses of bee colonies and the role of bees as pollinators, while others have underlined important issues for the impact of the increase in temperature on honeybee abundance and honey yields. In the present work, we draw our attention to Marchalina hellenica, which is the most important honeydew-producing insect in Greece. A statistically significant forecasting model for the effect of cold periods in February on the life cycle of the insect is constructed, with the aid of the Cumulative Logit Model and the theory of runs. The forecasting model may help beekeepers plan the timely exploitation of honeydew secretions of pine trees, which will be beneficial for beekeepers, the rural economy, and forest protection. The new suggested model also indicates that, in view of the climate change scenarios seen in the literature, the life cycle of M. hellenica is expected to be drastically shorter.Entities:
Keywords: climate change; cumulative logit model; forecasting model; honeydew flow; non-wood forest products; runs
Year: 2022 PMID: 35447817 PMCID: PMC9026817 DOI: 10.3390/insects13040375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 3.139
Figure 1Map of Rhodes with the areas of interest.
Descriptive statistics for minimum daily winter temperatures of Rhodes island.
| Descriptive Statistics | Average | Min | Max | s.d. 1 |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kalithies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Embonas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 s.d.: standard deviation, 2 : 20th percentile, 3 : 25th percentile, 4 : 25th percentile, 5 : median, temperature is measured in degrees Celsius ().
Descriptive statistics for the fortnight of completion of adult insects.
| Fortnight Category | Codes | Number of Cases | Marginal Percent (%) | Cumulative Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2nd fortnight of March | 1 |
|
|
|
| 1st fortnight of April | 2 |
|
|
|
| 2nd fortnight of April | 3 |
|
|
|
| 1st fortnight of May | 4 |
|
|
|
| 2nd fortnight of May | 5 |
|
|
|
| Valid |
|
| ||
| Missing |
| |||
| Total |
|
Figure 2Runs of length k = 2.
Figure 3Runs of length k = 3.
Figure 4Runs of length k = 4.
Description of variables of ordinal regression model.
| Variables | Symbol | Description | Unit/Scale of Measurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | |||
| Fortnight |
| Fortnight of completion of the biological cycle of M. hellenica | Ordinal variable is measured in five categories |
| Independent variable | |||
|
|
| Number of two | Ratio scale variable |
| consecutive | |||
| rcds during February | |||
|
|
| Number of three | Ratio scale variable |
| consecutive | |||
| rcds during February |
Runs occurrences in the experimental data.
| February |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kalithies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Embonas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Statistical results of POM for .
| Parameters | Estimate | Std. Error | Wald | D.F. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threshold | |||||||
|
| [1] |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| [2] |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| [3] |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| [4] |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Location |
|
| |||||
|
|
| 0.432 | 5.512 |
|
|
|
Figure 5Plots of cumulative frequencies for fortnight of completion of the biological cycle of M. hellenica and k = 2.
Prediction of the fortnight of M. hellenica’s biological cycle completion based on the number of runs of two consecutive rcds in February k = 2.
| Number of Runs of Two Consecutive Rcds in February | Fortnight | Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) | Probability Mass Function (PMF) | Cumulative Odds (CO) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2 March |
|
|
|
| 1 April |
|
|
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May |
|
|
| |
| 2 May |
|
| ||
|
| 2 March |
|
|
|
| 1 April |
|
|
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May |
|
|
| |
| 2 May |
|
| ||
|
| 2 March |
|
|
|
| 1 April |
|
|
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May |
|
|
| |
| 2 May |
|
| ||
|
| 2 March |
|
|
|
| 1 April |
|
|
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May | 0.8967 | 0.2749 |
| |
| 2 May |
|
| . | |
|
| 2 March |
|
| |
| 1 April |
|
| ||
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May |
|
|
| |
| 2 May |
|
| ||
|
| 2 March |
|
|
|
| 1 April |
|
|
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May |
|
|
| |
| 2 May |
|
| ||
|
| 2 March | 0.0008 |
| |
| 1 April |
|
|
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May |
|
|
| |
| 2 May |
|
|
Note: The column of CDF indicates the probability of the biological cycle completion of M. hellenica lower or equal to a specific fortnight j (). The column PMF indicates the probability of the biological cycle completion of M. hellenica equal to a specific fortnight j and can be calculated as: .
Statistical results of POM for .
| Threshold | Estimate | Std. Error | Wald | D.F. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Fortnight = [1] |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Fortnight = [2] | 2.128 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Fortnight = [3] |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Fortnight = [4] |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Location |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 6Plots of cumulative frequencies for fortnight of completion of the biological cycle of M. hellenica and k = 3.
Prediction of the fortnight of M. hellenica’s biological cycle completion based on the number of runs of three consecutive rcds in February .
| Number of Runs of Three Consecutive Rcds in February | Fortnight | Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) | Probability Mass Function (PMF) | Cumulative Odds (CO) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2 March |
|
|
|
| 1 April |
| 0.6537 |
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May |
|
|
| |
|
| 2 May |
|
| |
| 2 March |
|
|
| |
| 1 April |
|
|
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May |
|
|
| |
| 2 May |
|
| ||
|
| 2 March |
|
|
|
| 1 April |
|
|
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May |
|
|
| |
| 2 May |
|
| ||
|
| 2 March |
|
|
|
| 1 April |
|
|
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May |
|
|
| |
| 2 May |
|
| ||
|
| 2 March |
|
|
|
| 1 April |
|
|
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May |
|
|
| |
| 2 May |
|
| ||
|
| 2 March |
|
|
|
| 1 April |
|
|
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May | 0.0691 |
|
| |
| 2 May |
|
| ||
|
| 2 March |
|
|
|
| 1 April |
|
|
| |
| 2 April |
|
|
| |
| 1 May |
| 0.0127 |
| |
| 2 May |
|
|
Note: The column of CDF indicates the probability of the biological cycle completion of M. hellenica lower or equal to a specific fortnight j (). The column PMF indicates the probability of the biological cycle completion of M. hellenica equal to a specific fortnight j and can be calculated as: .