| Literature DB >> 35447806 |
Zhijun Zhou1,2, Huimin Huang1, Xuting Che1.
Abstract
We used Illumina sequencing of the 16S rDNA V3-V4 region to identify the bacterial community in laboratory-reared G. gratiosa feces across different developmental stages (1st-7th instar nymph day 0, and 0-, 7-, 14-, and 21-day adult) and sexes. In total, 14,480,559 high-quality reads were clustered into 2982 species-level operational taxonomic units (OTUs), with an average of 481.197 (±137.366) OTUs per sample. These OTUs were assigned into 25 phyla, 42 classes, 60 orders, 116 families, 241 genera, and some unclassified groups. Only 21 core OTUs were shared by all samples. The most representative phylum was Proteobacteria, followed by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Acidobacteria. At the genus level, Kluyvera (387 OTUs), Obesumbacterium (339 OTUs), Buttiauxella (296 OTUs), Lactobacillus (286 OTUs), and Hafnia (152 OTUs) were dominant bacteria. The early-instar nymphs harbored a similar bacterial community with other developmental stages, which contain higher species diversity. Both principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis (NMDS) failed to provide a clear clustering based on the developmental stages and sexes. Overall, we assume that G. gratiosa transmits bacteria vertically by eating contaminated eggshells, and both developmental stages and sexes had no significant effect on the fecal bacterial community.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rDNA V3-V4 region; Gampsocleis gratiosa; Illumina sequencing; bacterial community; developmental stage; katydids
Year: 2022 PMID: 35447806 PMCID: PMC9024567 DOI: 10.3390/insects13040361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 3.139
The sample labels and group information of this study.
| Group | Sex | Developmental Stage | Time Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| MN12 | Male | Early nymphs | 1st instar male nymphs, MN1 |
| 2nd instar male nymphs, MN2 | |||
| MN35 | Male | Middle nymphs | 3rd instar male nymphs, MN3 |
| 4th instar male nymphs, MN4 | |||
| 5th instar male nymphs, MN5 | |||
| MN67 | Male | Late nymphs | 6th instar male nymphs, MN6 |
| 7th instar male nymphs, MN7 | |||
| MA | Male | Adults | 0 day male adult, MA1 |
| 7 day male adult, MA2 | |||
| 14 day male adult, MA3 | |||
| 21 day male adult, MA4 | |||
| FN12 | Female | Early nymphs | 1st instar female nymphs, FN1 |
| 2nd instar female nymphs, FN2 | |||
| FN35 | Female | Middle nymphs | 3rd instar female nymphs, FN3 |
| 4th instar female nymphs, FN4 | |||
| 5th instar female nymphs, FN5 | |||
| FN67 | Female | Late nymphs | 6th instar female nymphs, FN6 |
| 7th instar female nymphs, FN7 | |||
| FA | Female | Adults | 0 day female adult, FA1 |
| 7 day female adult, FA2 | |||
| 14 day female adult, FA3 | |||
| 21 day female adult, FA4 |
Figure 1Changes in bacterial community diversity across life stages of Gampsocleis gratiosa. (A) Overview of development stages of Gampsocleis gratiosa, (B) species accumulation curves, (C) rarefaction analysis for each sample, (D) Venn diagram of OTU distribution.
No. of OTUs and relative abundance of dominant taxa at different taxonomic levels.
| Taxonomic Levels | No. OTUs (%) | % Read Counts |
|---|---|---|
| Proteobacteria | 2208 (74.04%) | 57.22% |
| Gammaproteobacteria | 2083 (69.85%) | 57.05% |
| Enterobacteriales | 2000 (67.07%) | 56.39% |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 2000 (67.07%) | 56.39% |
|
| 387 (12.98%) | 14.62% |
|
| 339 (11.37%) | 0.26% |
|
| 296 (9.93%) | 1.01% |
|
| 152 (5.10%) | 33.17% |
|
| 75 (2.52%) | 1.98% |
|
| 44 (1.48%) | 0.16% |
| Alphaproteobacteria | 57 (1.91%) | 0.08% |
| Betaproteobacteria | 35 (1.17%) | 0.08% |
| Firmicutes | 511 (17.14%) | 42.59% |
| Bacilli | 418 (14.02%) | 42.52% |
| Lactobacillales | 367 (12.31%) | 41.83% |
| Lactobacillaceae | 300 (10.06%) | 41.34% |
|
| 286 (9.59%) | 40.71% |
| Clostridia | 81 (2.72%) | 0.06% |
| Bacteroidetes | 58 (1.95%) | 0.04% |
| Bacteroidia | 41 (1.37%) | 0.03% |
| Acidobacteria | 55 (1.84%) | 0.01% |
Abundance and classification of core OTUs.
| OTU ID | % Read Counts | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otu128 | 0.14% | Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Enterococcaceae | Enterococcus |
| Otu2 | 38.95% | Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Lactobacillaceae | Lactobacillus |
| Otu408509 | 0.04% | Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Lactobacillaceae | Lactobacillus |
| Otu95456 | 0.02% | Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Lactobacillaceae | Lactobacillus |
| Otu211 | 0.09% | Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Leuconostocaceae | Weissella |
| Otu125 | 0.18% | Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Streptococcaceae | Lactococcus |
| Otu107 | 0.11% | Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Streptococcaceae | Lactococcus |
| Otu92 | 0.04% | Firmicutes | Bacilli | Lactobacillales | Streptococcaceae | Lactococcus |
| Otu212 | 0.06% | Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiales | Burkholderiaceae | Burkholderia |
| Otu14025 | 0.21% | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Buttiauxella |
| Otu66 | 1.48% | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Citrobacter |
| Otu6 | 0.82% | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Escherichia/Shigella |
| Otu1 | 13.90% | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Hafnia |
| Otu8 | 10.12% | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Hafnia |
| Otu10 | 7.70% | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Hafnia |
| Otu3 | 15.26% | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Kluyvera |
| Otu22 | 0.65% | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Serratia |
| Otu27 | 0.87% | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Unclassified |
| Otu210 | 0.41% | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Enterobacteriales | Enterobacteriaceae | Unclassified |
| Otu123 | 0.07% | Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Pseudomonadales | Pseudomonadaceae | Pseudomonas |
| Otu95457 | 0.02% | Thermotogae | Thermotogae | Petrotogales | Petrotogaceae | Defluviitoga |
Figure 2The alpha diversity of bacterial composition in Gampsocleis gratiosa fecal samples. (A) ACE, (B) Chao1, (C) Shannon, (D) Simpson.
Alpha diversity indices (Mean ± SD) of bacterial community in feces across Gampsocleis gratiosa’s different developmental stages and sexes.
| Group | Sample Size | Number of OTUs | Chao1 | ACE | Shannon | Simpson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MN12 | 6 | 475.667 ± 109.432 | 710.841 ± 159.337 | 722.539 ± 174.095 | 1.568 ± 0.383 | 0.667 ± 0.103 |
| MN35 | 9 | 459.333 ± 40.765 | 682.463 ± 61.026 | 705.487 ± 78.775 | 1.602 ± 0.262 | 0.659 ± 0.078 |
| MN67 | 6 | 396.667 ± 78.194 | 659.140 ± 78.934 | 664.879 ± 83.689 | 1.567 ± 0.403 | 0.644 ± 0.168 |
| MA | 12 | 355.500 ± 153.390 | 565.359 ± 193.420 | 582.558 ± 183.128 | 1.620 ± 0.318 | 0.683 ± 0.077 |
| FN12 | 6 | 512.000 ± 83.816 | 720.064 ± 161.132 | 736.850 ± 163.78 | 1.927 ± 0.275 | 0.760 ± 0.084 |
| FN35 | 9 | 419.444 ± 61.561 | 615.366 ± 110.787 | 647.467 ± 119.32 | 1.577 ± 0.418 | 0.632 ± 0.185 |
| FN67 | 6 | 592.000 ± 179.861 | 803.358 ± 194.458 | 821.251 ± 202.958 | 1.707 ± 0.430 | 0.663 ± 0.163 |
| FA | 12 | 446.833 ± 157.623 | 663.298 ± 163.211 | 667.523 ± 173.058 | 1.812 ± 0.408 | 0.714 ± 0.134 |
Figure 3Bacterial beta diversity of Gampsocleis gratios. (A–C) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity indices, unweighted UniFrac, and weighted UniFrac distance. (D) Non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis (NMDS) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity indices. (E) Differences in bacterial taxa among groups determined by linear discriminative analysis effect size (LEfSe), Abbreviation: g_, genus and f_, family. (F) Heat map of the relative abundance of bacterial communities at the genus level. The genus of which abundance is less than 0.2% in all samples were classified into “Other”. The OTUs was not classified into genus level were marked by “Unclassified”. Heatmap color scale represents the proportion of sequences assigned to the genus.