Literature DB >> 3544690

Low-dose antihypertensive treatment with a thiazide diuretic is not diabetogenic. A 10-year controlled trial with bendroflumethiazide.

G Berglund, O Andersson, B Widgren.   

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) and metabolic variables were determined initially and after 1, 2, 4, 6 and 10 years' treatment in two groups of hypertensive men (n = 53 each) randomized to bendroflumethiazide 2.5-5 mg/day or propranolol 160-320 mg daily. There was no significant differences in BP or metabolic variables between the two groups at entry. BP was reduced to the same degree by both treatments. Five men in the propranolol group and one man in the thiazide group developed clinically overt diabetes during follow-up. Fasting blood sugar increased slightly but significantly though equally in both groups. Oral glucose tolerance was initially impaired to the same degree in both groups but improved significantly during treatment with both drugs. Fasting insulin increased slightly but to the same degree. While serum potassium decreased significantly in the thiazide group, the total body potassium was unchanged in this group. In the propranolol group, serum potassium rose, while total body potassium decreased significantly. Serum urate increased in both groups, though slightly more during thiazide treatment. One case of gout was found in each group. There was no difference in serum lipids between the two groups. The finding in this long-term trial indicate that in middle-aged men with mild to moderate hypertension a low-dose thiazide diuretic like bendroflumethiazide is as effective and safe an antihypertensive agent as the beta-blocker propranolol is and that it does not induce diabetes. The total clinical picture favors the retention of thiazide diuretics as a first choice drug in hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3544690     DOI: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1986.tb02790.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Med Scand        ISSN: 0001-6101


  12 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of antihypertensive therapies: does the evidence assist in choosing a first-line drug?

Authors:  J M Wright; C H Lee; G K Chambers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-07-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Allopathy--the therapeutic legacy.

Authors:  G D Johnston
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Re-examining the efficacy of beta-blockers for the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nadia Khan; Finlay A McAlister
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Drug-induced hypokalaemia. A cause for concern.

Authors:  G Isaac; O B Holland
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Gout, not induced by diuretics? A case-control study from primary care.

Authors:  H J E M Janssens; E H van de Lisdonk; M Janssen; H J M van den Hoogen; A L M Verbeek
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Diuretic use, increased serum urate levels, and risk of incident gout in a population-based study of adults with hypertension: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities cohort study.

Authors:  Mara A McAdams DeMarco; Janet W Maynard; Alan N Baer; Allan C Gelber; J Hunter Young; Alvaro Alonso; Josef Coresh
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-01

Review 7.  Beta-blockers for hypertension.

Authors:  Charles S Wiysonge; Hazel A Bradley; Jimmy Volmink; Bongani M Mayosi; Lionel H Opie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-20

8.  Should β blockers no longer be considered first-line therapy for the treatment of essential hypertension without comorbidities?

Authors:  William J Elliott; W Kurtis Childers
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  A urate gene-by-diuretic interaction and gout risk in participants with hypertension: results from the ARIC study.

Authors:  Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Janet W Maynard; Alan N Baer; Linda W Kao; Anna Kottgen; Josef Coresh
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 10.  Adverse effects of diuretics.

Authors:  E D Freis
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.