| Literature DB >> 35446714 |
Wenqiang Che1,2, Yujiao Wang3, Yanmin Zhou1, Xiangyu Wang1, Jun Lyu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The correlations of epidemiological characteristics and clinical outcomes with different tumor sites in patients with intracranial typical site germinomas (ICTSGs) have not yet been well established. We analyzed ICTSGs using a multicenter database, focusing on its demographic, management patterns, and long-term survival outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: SEER; germinomas; pineal gland; prognosis; suprasellar
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35446714 PMCID: PMC9039445 DOI: 10.1177/10732748221095944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Control ISSN: 1073-2748 Impact factor: 2.339
Demographics of patients with intracranial typical site germinomas.
| Characteristics | Total (%) | Pituitary (%) | Pineal (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 327 (100) | 53 (100) | 274 (100) | — |
| Mean age (S.D.) | 18.32 (8.45) | 17.98 (9.65) | 18.39 (8.20) | .750 |
| Age | — | |||
| Pediatric | 197 (60.24) | 32 (60.38) | 166 (60.58) | .978 |
| Adult | 130 (39.76) | 21 (39.62) | 108 (39.42) | — |
| Sex | — | |||
| Male | 293 (89.60) | 35 (66.04) | 258 (94.16) | <.001 |
| Race | — | |||
| N-H* White | 175 (53.52) | 27 (50.94) | 148 (54.02) | .442 |
| N-H* Black | 20 (6.12) | 2 (3.77) | 18 (6.57) | — |
| Hispanic | 70 (21.41) | 10 (18.87) | 60 (21.90) | |
| Others | 62 (18.96) | 14 (26.42) | 48 (17.52) | |
| Tumor size | — | |||
| ≤24 | 98 (29.97) | 20 (37.74) | 78 (28.47) | <.001 |
| >24 | 150 (45.87) | 10 (18.87) | 140 (51.10) | — |
| Unknown | 79 (24.16) | 23 (43.40) | 56 (20.44) | |
| Region | — | |||
| West | 228 (69.73) | 38 (71.70) | 190 (69.34) | .988 |
| South | 45 (13.76) | 7 (13.21) | 38 (13.87) | — |
| Midwest | 21 (6.42) | 3 (5.66) | 18 (6.57) | |
| Northeast | 33 (10.09) | 5 (9.43) | 28 (10.22) | |
| Status | — | |||
| Alive | 286 (87.46) | 47 (88.68) | 239 (87.23) | .770 |
| Follow‐up time (Months)* | 119 (165-83) | 121 (164-83) | 108 (165.75-80.25) | .964 |
Follow‐up time (months)* expressed as median (interquartile range, IQR). N-H, non-Hispanic.
Management patterns* of patients with intracranial typical site germinomas.
| Characteristics | Total (%) | Pituitary (%) | Pineal (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiotherapy (RT) | — | |||
| Yes | 268 (82.97) | 42 (82.35) | 226 (83.10) | .898 |
| Chemotherapy (CT) | — | |||
| Yes | 199 (60.61) | 36 (70.59) | 163 (59.92) | .151 |
| Surgery | — | |||
| GTR | 26 (7.95) | 8 (15.09) | 18 (6.57) | .001 |
| STR | 34 (10.40) | 11 (20.76) | 23 (8.40) | — |
| Biopsy | 57 (17.43) | 10 (18.87) | 47 (17.15) | |
| No | 206 (63.78) | 22 (41.51) | 184 (67.15) | |
| Surgery | — | |||
| Yes | 117 (36.22) | 29 (56.86) | 88 (32.35) | <.001 |
| Treatment comparison | — | |||
| RT+CT | 109 (33.33) | 16 (30.19) | 93 (33.94) | — |
| RT only | 57 (17.43) | 3 (5.66) | 54 (19.71) | |
| Biopsy +RT+CT | 28 (8.56) | 4 (7.55) | 24 (8.76) | |
| CT only | 24 (7.34) | 2 (3.77) | 22 (8.03) | |
| STR+RT+CT | 22 (6.73) | 8 (15.09) | 14 (5.11) | |
| Biopsy +RT | 20 (6.12) | 1 (1.89) | 19 (6.94) | |
| No treatment | 16 (4.89) | 1 (1.89) | 15 (5.47) | |
| GTR+RT | 13 (3.98) | 2 (3.77) | 11 (4.02) | |
| GTR+RT+ CT | 10 (3.06) | 5 (9.43) | 5 (1.83) | |
| STR+RT | 9 (2.75) | 3 (5.66) | 6 (2.19) | |
| Biopsy only | 6 (1.84) | 4 (7.55) | 2 (.73) | |
| Biopsy +CT | 3 (.92) | 1 (1.89) | 2 (.73) | |
| GTR only | 2 (.61) | 1 (1.89) | 1 (.37) | |
| STR+CT | 2 (.61) | 0 (.00) | 2 (.73) | |
| GTR+CT | 1 (.31) | 0 (.00) | 1 (.37) | |
| STR only | 1 (.31) | 0 (.00) | 1 (.37) | |
Available data for management patterns* n =323; RT, Radiotherapy; CT, Chemotherapy; GTR, gross total resection; STR, subtotal resection.
Figure 1.Workflow for the analysis of demographics and management patterns of patients with intracranial typical site germinomas.
Figure 2.The number of patients with intracranial typical site germinomas.
Figure 3.Kaplan–Meier curves showing a significantly improved long-term survival in patients receiving radiotherapy (A) or chemotherapy (B); surgical treatment (C) and tumor site (D) were not associated with patient survival; smaller tumor size (<24 mm) was related to better long-term survival, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (E).