Comparative efficacy and safety of eleven induction chemotherapy regimens for young adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a network meta-analysis.

The optimal induction chemotherapy regimens for young adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are not well-defined since the lack of direct comparisons between emerging treatments. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a statistical tool to integrate direct and indirect evidence to evaluate the effect of multiple interventions. Thus, we conducted an NMA to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of different inductions for these patients. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from establishment to 2020-03-11. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using different inductions were included. We deemed 11 trials eligible, including 11 inductions with 5052 participants. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. In terms of complete remission (CR) rate, DAC ranked highest and was significantly higher than IA (RR = 1.27, 95% CI (1.09-1.48)) and DA (RR = 1.28, 95% CI (1.13-1.46)) (p < 0.05). The ranking of DA + Pioglitazone was second only to that of DAC, followed by HAA. For early mortality, HAD, HAA, and DA + GO were significantly higher than DA/IA (p < 0.05). DAC and DA + Pioglitazone showed similar early mortality compared to DA/IA (p > 0.05). Regarding incidence of early grade 3-4 infection, no significant differences between interventions were observed. To conclude, among the included 11 induction regimens, DAC was potentially the top choice for young adult patients with newly diagnosed AML, with highest CR rate, low early mortality, and incidence of early infection. DA + Pioglitazone and HAA also showed a superiority over the others to achieve higher CR rate, while caution should be kept in mind due to the higher early mortality of HAA.