Literature DB >> 35445813

Severe isolated injuries have a high impact on resource use and mortality: a Dutch nationwide observational study.

Mitchell L S Driessen1, Mariska A C de Jongh2, Leontien M Sturms3, Frank W Bloemers4, Henk Jan Ten Duis5, Michael J R Edwards6, Dennis den Hartog7, Peter A Leenhouts8, Martijn Poeze9, Inger B Schipper10, Richard W Spanjersberg11, Klaus W Wendt12, Ralph J de Wit13, Stefan W A M van Zutphen14, Luke P H Leenen15.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Berlin poly-trauma definition (BPD) has proven to be a valuable way of identifying patients with at least a 20% risk of mortality, by combining anatomical injury characteristics with the presence of physiological risk factors (PRFs). Severe isolated injuries (SII) are excluded from the BPD. This study describes the characteristics, resource use and outcomes of patients with SII according to their injured body region, and compares them with those included in the BPD.
METHODS: Data were extracted from the Dutch National Trauma Registry between 2015 and 2019. SII patients were defined as those with an injury with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score ≥ 4 in one body region, with at most minor additional injuries (AIS ≤ 2). We performed an SII subgroup analysis per AIS region of injury. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for SII subgroup patient outcomes, and resource needs.
RESULTS: A total of 10.344 SII patients were included; 47.8% were ICU admitted, and the overall mortality was 19.5%. The adjusted risk of death was highest for external (2.5, CI 1.9-3.2) and for head SII (2.0, CI 1.7-2.2). Patients with SII to the abdomen (2.3, CI 1.9-2.8) and thorax (1.8, CI 1.6-2.0) had a significantly higher risk of ICU admission. The highest adjusted risk of disability was recorded for spine injuries (10.3, CI 8.3-12.8). The presence of ≥ 1 PRFs was associated with higher mortality rates compared to their poly-trauma counterparts, displaying rates of at least 15% for thoracic, 17% for spine, 22% for head and 49% for external SII.
CONCLUSION: A severe isolated injury is a high-risk entity and should be recognized and treated as such. The addition of PRFs to the isolated anatomical injury criteria contributes to the identification of patients with SII at risk of worse outcomes.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Isolated injury; Outcome; Physiological risk factor; Resources; Scales and system of injury

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35445813     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-01972-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   2.374


  15 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology of polytrauma.

Authors:  Marius Keel; Otmar Trentz
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  The definition of polytrauma revisited: An international consensus process and proposal of the new 'Berlin definition'

Authors:  Hans-Christoph Pape; Rolf Lefering; Nerida Butcher; Andrew Peitzman; Luke Leenen; Ingo Marzi; Philip Lichte; Christoph Josten; Bertil Bouillon; Uli Schmucker; Philip Stahel; Peter Giannoudis; Zsolt Balogh
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.313

3.  Evaluation of trauma care in a mature level I trauma center in the Netherlands: outcomes in a Dutch mature level I trauma center.

Authors:  Koen W W Lansink; Amy C Gunning; Anique T E Spijkers; Luke P H Leenen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Do designated trauma systems improve outcome?

Authors:  Koen W W Lansink; Luke P H Leenen
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 5.  The definition of polytrauma: the need for international consensus.

Authors:  Nerida Butcher; Zsolt J Balogh
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  How to define severely injured patients? -- an Injury Severity Score (ISS) based approach alone is not sufficient.

Authors:  Thomas Paffrath; Rolf Lefering; Sascha Flohé
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  The Dutch nationwide trauma registry: The value of capturing all acute trauma admissions.

Authors:  M L S Driessen; L M Sturms; F W Bloemers; H J Ten Duis; M J R Edwards; D den Hartog; M A C de Jongh; P A Leenhouts; M Poeze; I B Schipper; W R Spanjersberg; K W Wendt; R J de Wit; S van Zutphen; L P H Leenen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Assessment of polytraumatized patients according to the Berlin Definition: Does the addition of physiological data really improve interobserver reliability?

Authors:  Carina Eva Maria Pothmann; Stephen Baumann; Kai Oliver Jensen; Ladislav Mica; Georg Osterhoff; Hans-Peter Simmen; Kai Sprengel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Utstein template for uniform reporting of data following major trauma: a joint revision by SCANTEM, TARN, DGU-TR and RITG.

Authors:  Kjetil G Ringdal; Timothy J Coats; Rolf Lefering; Stefano Di Bartolomeo; Petter Andreas Steen; Olav Røise; Lauri Handolin; Hans Morten Lossius
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013.

Authors:  Juanita A Haagsma; Nicholas Graetz; Ian Bolliger; Mohsen Naghavi; Hideki Higashi; Erin C Mullany; Semaw Ferede Abera; Jerry Puthenpurakal Abraham; Koranteng Adofo; Ubai Alsharif; Emmanuel A Ameh; Walid Ammar; Carl Abelardo T Antonio; Lope H Barrero; Tolesa Bekele; Dipan Bose; Alexandra Brazinova; Ferrán Catalá-López; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Paul I Dargan; Diego De Leo; Louisa Degenhardt; Sarah Derrett; Samath D Dharmaratne; Tim R Driscoll; Leilei Duan; Sergey Petrovich Ermakov; Farshad Farzadfar; Valery L Feigin; Richard C Franklin; Belinda Gabbe; Richard A Gosselin; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Randah Ribhi Hamadeh; Martha Hijar; Guoqing Hu; Sudha P Jayaraman; Guohong Jiang; Yousef Saleh Khader; Ejaz Ahmad Khan; Sanjay Krishnaswami; Chanda Kulkarni; Fiona E Lecky; Ricky Leung; Raimundas Lunevicius; Ronan Anthony Lyons; Marek Majdan; Amanda J Mason-Jones; Richard Matzopoulos; Peter A Meaney; Wubegzier Mekonnen; Ted R Miller; Charles N Mock; Rosana E Norman; Ricardo Orozco; Suzanne Polinder; Farshad Pourmalek; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Amany Refaat; David Rojas-Rueda; Nobhojit Roy; David C Schwebel; Amira Shaheen; Saeid Shahraz; Vegard Skirbekk; Kjetil Søreide; Sergey Soshnikov; Dan J Stein; Bryan L Sykes; Karen M Tabb; Awoke Misganaw Temesgen; Eric Yeboah Tenkorang; Alice M Theadom; Bach Xuan Tran; Tommi J Vasankari; Monica S Vavilala; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Solomon Meseret Woldeyohannes; Paul Yip; Naohiro Yonemoto; Mustafa Z Younis; Chuanhua Yu; Christopher J L Murray; Theo Vos
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.399

View more
  1 in total

1.  Funnel plots a graphical instrument for the evaluation of population performance and quality of trauma care: a blueprint of implementation.

Authors:  M L S Driessen; E W van Zwet; L M Sturms; M A C de Jongh; L P H Leenen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.374

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.