Literature DB >> 35445342

Collaborative Development of a PACS-Integrated Quality Control Dashboard: a Single Institutional Experience.

Jonathan D Pierce1, Vijaya Kosaraju2, Beverly Rosipko3, Jeffrey L Sunshine2, Ian Judd4, Jennifer Sommer2.   

Abstract

Regular communication between technologists and radiologists is necessary for maintaining optimal diagnostic image quality throughout a radiology practice. In a large hospital system with multiple sites, this task becomes increasingly difficult without simultaneously causing significant disruptions in the clinical workflow and decreased throughput. Thus, establishing a system for quality control reporting that enables effective communication in a seamless and convenient manner is imperative. In this report, we describe the development of a new integrated system, in collaboration with our PACS vendor, with tools that allow for instant reporting of quality errors and dashboards providing real-time up-to-date quality data across our hospital system, directly accessible from PACS. To date, 8,167 quality reports have been logged in our new system with roughly 355 submissions per month. Early user engagement and consensus feedback among radiologists and technologists have been positive suggesting an overall improvement from prior systems. We hope this report can help inform other radiology enterprises seeking to improve quality control reporting within their clinical practice.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; PACS; Quality assurance; Quality control; Radiology; Technologist

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35445342      PMCID: PMC9582052          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-022-00621-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.903


  7 in total

Review 1.  Informatics in radiology: Measuring and improving quality in radiology: meeting the challenge with informatics.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Online Error Reporting for Managing Quality Control Within Radiology.

Authors:  Pedram Golnari; Daniel Forsberg; Beverly Rosipko; Jeffrey L Sunshine
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Implementation of a Point-of-Care Radiologist-Technologist Communication Tool in a Quality Assurance Program.

Authors:  Leonard Ong; Pierre Elnajjar; C Gregory Nyman; Thomas Mair; Krishna Juluru
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Radiologic quality and safety: mapping value into radiology.

Authors:  Stephen J Swensen; C Daniel Johnson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Quality control management and communication between radiologists and technologists.

Authors:  Paul G Nagy; Benjamin Pierce; Misty Otto; Nabile M Safdar
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Radiologist technologist communication.

Authors:  Brent Savoie; Frank J Lexa; Paul Nagy
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Making Feedback Easy: A Workflow-Integrated Quality Improvement Tool Increases Radiologist Engagement in the Technical Quality of Imaging Examinations.

Authors:  Shlomit Goldberg-Stein; Oleg Kaplun; Meir H Scheinfeld; Judah Burns; Todd Miller; Amichai Erdfarb
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.532

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.