Literature DB >> 35445334

Contact chemoreception in multi-modal sensing of prey by Octopus.

K C Buresch1, K Sklar2, J Y Chen2, S R Madden2, A S Mongil2, G V Wise2, J G Boal3, R T Hanlon4.   

Abstract

Octopuses have keen vision and are generally considered visual predators, yet octopuses predominantly forage blindly in nature, inserting their arms into crevices to search and detect hidden prey. The extent to which octopuses discriminate prey using chemo- versus mechano-tactile sensing is unknown. We developed a whole-animal behavioral assay that takes advantage of octopuses' natural searching behavior to test their ability to discriminate prey from non-prey tastes solely via contact chemoreception. This methodology eliminated vision, mechano-tactile sensing and distance chemoreception while testing the contact chemosensory discriminatory abilities of the octopus arm suckers. Extracts from two types of prey (crab, shrimp) and three types of non-prey (sea star, algae, seawater) were embedded in agarose (to control for mechano-tactile discrimination) and presented to octopuses inside an artificial rock dome; octopuses reached their arms inside to explore its contents - imitating natural prey-searching behavior. Results revealed that octopuses are capable of discriminating between potential prey items using only contact chemoreception, as measured by an increased amount of sucker contact time and arm curls when presented with prey extracts versus non-prey extracts. These results highlight the importance of contact chemoreception in the multi-modal sensing involved in a complex foraging behavior.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; Foraging; Octopus bimaculoides; Sensory perception; Suckers

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35445334     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-022-01549-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   2.389


  8 in total

1.  Electrophysiological and Motor Responses to Chemosensory Stimuli in Isolated Cephalopod Arms.

Authors:  Kaitlyn E Fouke; Heather J Rhodes
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 1.818

2.  Feel the light: sight-independent negative phototactic response in octopus arms.

Authors:  Itamar Katz; Tal Shomrat; Nir Nesher
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Control of accept and reect reflexes in the octopus.

Authors:  J S Altman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Molecular Basis of Chemotactile Sensation in Octopus.

Authors:  Lena van Giesen; Peter B Kilian; Corey A H Allard; Nicholas W Bellono
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  The Eye of the Common Octopus (Octopus vulgaris).

Authors:  Frederike D Hanke; Almut Kelber
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Octopus arms exhibit exceptional flexibility.

Authors:  E B Lane Kennedy; Kendra C Buresch; Preethi Boinapally; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Cephalopods as Predators: A Short Journey among Behavioral Flexibilities, Adaptions, and Feeding Habits.

Authors:  Roger Villanueva; Valentina Perricone; Graziano Fiorito
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.