Literature DB >> 35445178

The Benefit of Routine Axillary Sonographic Assessment in cN0 Breast Cancer Patients.

Marian Khatib1,2, Panagiotis Sgardelis1, Schlomo Schneebaum2, Ortal Schaffer2, Richard Sutton1.   

Abstract

Objective: Axillary ultrasound (US) is often part of the routine assessment of the clinically negative axilla in primary breast cancer, which determines the extent of axillary surgery to be performed. This study aims to ascertain the burden of disease in the axilla of patients with a normal clinical examination (cN0) but with US detected metastatic axillary lymph nodes. Materials and
Methods: We retrospectively identified 345 female patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection, following a positive lymph node biopsy, between January 2015 and August 2019.Eighty-nine of those had a positive biopsy prior to surgery. They were divided into two groups: Those with clinically palpable axillary disease preoperatively, cN1 (n = 41), and those with a normal clinical axillary examination, cN0 (n = 48). We assessed the number of positive axillary lymph nodes dissected in the two groups.
Results: In the cN0 group the mean value of excised disease-positive axillary lymph nodes was 3.6, while in the cN1 group it was 8.0 (p<0.01). However, further analysis showed that 25 patients of the cN0 who had T1/T2 tumors had ≥3 positive lymph nodes.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that the presence of clinically palpable axillary lymph nodes appears to be correlated to a higher number of positive lymph nodes. However, in cases of non-palpable sonographically positive lymph nodes there might still be significant axillary disease, even in T1 and T2 tumors. Therefore we still support the routine use of preoperative sonographic assessment of the axilla for early breast cancer. ©Copyright 2022 by the the Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Societies / European Journal of Breast Health published by Galenos Publishing House.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axilla; axillary dissection; breast ultrasonography; positive lymph nodes; sentinel node biopsy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35445178      PMCID: PMC8987851          DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-11-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Breast Health


  23 in total

1.  Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  E Senkus; S Kyriakides; S Ohno; F Penault-Llorca; P Poortmans; E Rutgers; S Zackrisson; F Cardoso
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Long-term morbidity of patients with early breast cancer after sentinel lymph node biopsy compared to axillary lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Tobias Schulze; Jörg Mucke; Jorn Markwardt; Peter M Schlag; Andreas Bembenek
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update Summary.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Mark R Somerfield; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Is Preoperative Axillary Imaging Beneficial in Identifying Clinically Node-Negative Patients Requiring Axillary Lymph Node Dissection?

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Maxine Jochelson; Jessica C Gooch; Sujata Patil; Michelle Stempel; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt; Karla V Ballman; Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Linda M McCall; Monica Morrow
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Sarah Temin; Stephen B Edge; Lisa A Newman; Roderick R Turner; Donald L Weaver; Al B Benson; Linda D Bosserman; Harold J Burstein; Hiram Cody; James Hayman; Cheryl L Perkins; Donald A Podoloff; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Giovanni Paganelli; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Stefano Zurrida; Viviana Galimberti; Mattia Intra; Paolo Veronesi; Chris Robertson; Patrick Maisonneuve; Giuseppe Renne; Concetta De Cicco; Francesca De Lucia; Roberto Gennari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Morbidity after conventional dissection of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Emerson Wander Silva Soares; Hildebrando Massahiro Nagai; Luis César Bredt; Ademar Dantas da Cunha; Reginaldo José Andrade; Géser Vinícius Silva Soares
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Breast Cancer: Efficacy and Complication in Developing Countries.

Authors:  Mohaned O Abass; Mohamed D A Gismalla; Ahmed A Alsheikh; Moawia M A Elhassan
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-10

Review 10.  Staging of the Axilla in Breast Cancer and the Evolving Role of Axillary Ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael Y Chen; William E Gillanders
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2021-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.