| Literature DB >> 35445004 |
Fangze Guo1,2, Changqing Yuan1,2, Hailin Huang1,2, Xuyang Deng1,2, Zirui Bian2, Danyang Wang1,2, Keke Dou1,2, Li Mei1,2,3, Qihui Zhou1,2,3.
Abstract
Nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA) has been widely applied as a tissue-engineering biomaterial and interacted with osteoblasts/stem cells to repair bone defects. In addition, T cells that coexist with osteoblasts/stem cells in the bone modulate the regulation of osteoimmunology by cytokine formation. However, the effects of nHA on T cells and the following regulatory interplay on osteogenic differentiation have been rarely examined. In this work, the physicochemical properties of needle-like nHA are characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy, zeta potential, Fourier transform-infrared and X-ray diffraction. It is found that as the concentration of nHA increases, the proliferation of T cells gradually increases, and the proportion of apoptotic T cells decreases. The percentage of CD4+ T cells is higher than that of CD8+ T cells under the regulation of needle-like nHA. Furthermore, the supernatant of T cells co-cultured with nHA significantly inhibits the osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 by downregulating the formation of alkaline phosphatase and calcium nodule compared with the supernatant of nHA. Thus, our findings provide new insight into the nHA-mediated T cell and osteoblast interactions.Entities:
Keywords: T cell; nano-hydroxyapatite; nanomaterials; osteogenesis; osteoimmunology
Year: 2022 PMID: 35445004 PMCID: PMC9013933 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.884291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Schematic diagram of the effects of nHA on T cell responses, differentiation, and the following regulatory on osteoblasts.
FIGURE 2(A) FE-SEM image of nHA. (B,C) Length and width size distribution of nHA. (D) Zeta potential of nHA in DI water and 1640 RPMI complete medium. (E) FT-IR spectrum of nHA. The purple, green and blue arrows indicated OH-, CO32- and PO43- groups, respectively. (F) XRD pattern of nHA.
FIGURE 3(A) T cells viability on various samples for 1, 2 and 3 days. * represents p < 0.05 and ** represents p < 0.01. (B) Effect of nHA on T cell proliferation. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of the effect of nHA on T cell apoptosis. (D) Quantitative analysis of apoptosis.
FIGURE 4Flow cytometry analysis of the effect of nHA on T cell differentiation.
FIGURE 5MC3T3-E1 cells viability on various samples for 1 and 3 days. ** represents p < 0.01.
FIGURE 6(A) ALP staining images. (B) The quantitative assessment of the ALP staining results was performed using ImageJ. (C) ALP activity of MC3T3-E1 cells on different samples after 14 days of culture. * represents p < 0.05 and ** represents p < 0.01. (D) ARS stained images of MC3T3-E1 cells on different samples after 14 days culture.