| Literature DB >> 35444963 |
Lieke A Hoogenboom1,2, A Titia Lely3, Matthew W Kemp4,5,6,7, Masatoshi Saito4, Alan H Jobe8, Tim G A M Wolfs9,10, Michiel F Schreuder2.
Abstract
Background: Perinatal complications, such as prematurity and intrauterine growth restriction, are associated with increased risk of chronic kidney disease. Although often associated with reduced nephron endowment, there is also evidence of increased susceptibility for sclerotic changes and podocyte alterations. Preterm birth is frequently associated with chorioamnionitis, though studies regarding the effect of chorioamnionitis on the kidney are scarce. In this study, we aim to unravel the consequences of premature birth and/or perinatal inflammation on kidney development using an ovine model.Entities:
Keywords: chorioamnionitis; mesangium; ovine model; podocyte; prematurity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35444963 PMCID: PMC9013807 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.796702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.569
FIGURE 1Experimental design. Timeline at the (top) represents intra amniotic (IA) lipopolysaccharide injection at 15, 8, and 2 days before sacrifice. Timeline at the (bottom) represents gestational age in days with the first IA injection at 110 days, sacrifice at 125 days, and illustrating term date at 150 days gestation.
Quantitative PCR primers.
| Primer | Sequence |
| TNFA | Forward 5′-GCCGGAATACCTGGACTATGC |
| Reverse 5′-CAGGGCGATGATCCCAAAGTAG | |
| IL10 | Forward 5′-CATGGGCCTGACATCAAGGA |
| Reverse 5′-CGGAGGGTCTTCAGCTTCTC | |
| DES | Forward 5′ TACCAGGACCTGCTCAATGT |
| Reverse 5′ GGGCTTGTTTCTCGGAAGTTG | |
| TGFB | Forward 5′-AAAAGAACTGCTGTGTTCGTCA |
| Reverse 5′-GACCTTGCTGTACTGTGTGTCC | |
| PDGFB | Forward 5′ CTACCTGCGTCTGGTCAGC |
| Reverse 5′ CAGCTCCGTCTTCATCTAAGGAG | |
| PDGFRB | Forward 5′ TGTTGGGCTACTGAATGTGTTG |
| Reverse 5′ CAGACAAGCCACAAGTCAACG | |
| SYNPO | Forward 5′ CCAGCTCTGTGAATTGGCTG |
| Reverse 5′ GACGCTTGCGTGATTGTTGG |
FIGURE 2Inflammatory and injury markers in kidney tissue. Each point represents an individual animal, horizontal line marks the median. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test and post hoc Dunn’s test. (A) Average number of myeloperoxidase (MPO) positive nuclei per power field at 200× magnification, **p < 0.01 compared with 2 days lipopolysaccharide (LPS); (B) Representative image of MPO staining in control; (C) Representative image of MPO staining at 15 days LPS; (D) qPCR relative expression of tumor necrosis factor alfa (TNFA), *p < 0.05 compared to control; (E) qPCR relative expression of IL10, *p < 0.05 compared with control; (F) qPCR relative expression of desmin.
FIGURE 3Expression of mesangial pro-fibrotic markers. Each point represents an individual animal, horizontal line marks the median. Data was analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test and post hoc Dunn’s test. (A) qPCR relative expression of transforming growth factor beta (TGFB), **p < 0.01 compared with control; (B) qPCR relative expression of platelet derived growth factor b (PDGFB); (C) qPCR relative expression of platelet derived growth factor receptor b (PDGFRB); (D) Average percentage of glomerular surface area positive for alfa-smooth muscle actin (aSMA) on immunohistochemistry, *p < 0.05 compared with 15 days LPS.
FIGURE 4Expression of podocyte markers wilms tumor 1 (WT1) and synaptopodin. Each point represents an individual animal, horizontal line marks the median. Data was analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test and post hoc Dunn’s test. (A) Number of WT1 positive nuclei per surface area. *p < 0.05 compared with control; (B) aPCR relative expression of synaptopodin. *p < 0.05 compared with control; (C) Representative image of WT1 staining in control; (D) Representative WT1 staining in 8 days lipopolysacharide (LPS).