Ursula C Patel1, Georgiana Ismail1, Katie J Suda2,3, Rabeeya Sabzwari1, Susan M Pacheco1,4, Sudha Bhoopalam1. 1. Edward Hines, Jr Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois. 2. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania. 4. Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.
Abstract
Background: Although automated urine cultures (UCs) following urinalysis (UA) are often used in emergency departments (EDs) to identify urinary tract infections (UTIs), results are often reported as no organism growth or the growth of clinically insignificant organisms, leading to the overdetection and overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). Methods: A process change was implemented at a US Department of Veterans Affairs medical center ED that automatically cancelled UCs if UAs had < 5 white blood cells per high-power field (WBC/HPF). An option for do not cancel (DNC) UC was available. Data were prospectively collected for 3 months postimplementation and included UA/UC results, presence of UTI symptoms, antibiotics prescribed, and health care utilization. Results: Postintervention, 684 UAs (37.2%) were evaluated from ED visits. Postintervention, of 255 UAs, 95 (37.3%) were negative with UC cancelled, 95 (37.3%) were positive with UC processed, 43 (16.9%) were ordered as DNC, and 22 (8.6%) were ordered without a UC. UC processing despite a negative UA significantly decreased from 100% preintervention to 38.6% postintervention (P < .001). Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics for ASB was reduced from 10.2% preintervention to 1.9% postintervention (odds ratio = 0.17; P = .01). In patients with negative UA specimens, antibiotic prescribing decreased by 25.3% postintervention. No reports of outpatient, ED, or hospital visits for symptomatic UTI were found within 7 days of the initial UA postintervention. Conclusions: The UA to reflex culture process change resulted in a significant reduction in processing of inappropriate UCs and unnecessary antibiotic use for ASB. There were no missed UTIs or other adverse patient outcomes.
Background: Although automated urine cultures (UCs) following urinalysis (UA) are often used in emergency departments (EDs) to identify urinary tract infections (UTIs), results are often reported as no organism growth or the growth of clinically insignificant organisms, leading to the overdetection and overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). Methods: A process change was implemented at a US Department of Veterans Affairs medical center ED that automatically cancelled UCs if UAs had < 5 white blood cells per high-power field (WBC/HPF). An option for do not cancel (DNC) UC was available. Data were prospectively collected for 3 months postimplementation and included UA/UC results, presence of UTI symptoms, antibiotics prescribed, and health care utilization. Results: Postintervention, 684 UAs (37.2%) were evaluated from ED visits. Postintervention, of 255 UAs, 95 (37.3%) were negative with UC cancelled, 95 (37.3%) were positive with UC processed, 43 (16.9%) were ordered as DNC, and 22 (8.6%) were ordered without a UC. UC processing despite a negative UA significantly decreased from 100% preintervention to 38.6% postintervention (P < .001). Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics for ASB was reduced from 10.2% preintervention to 1.9% postintervention (odds ratio = 0.17; P = .01). In patients with negative UA specimens, antibiotic prescribing decreased by 25.3% postintervention. No reports of outpatient, ED, or hospital visits for symptomatic UTI were found within 7 days of the initial UA postintervention. Conclusions: The UA to reflex culture process change resulted in a significant reduction in processing of inappropriate UCs and unnecessary antibiotic use for ASB. There were no missed UTIs or other adverse patient outcomes.
Authors: Cynthia Fok; Mary P Fitzgerald; Thomas Turk; Elizabeth Mueller; Leslie Dalaza; Paul Schreckenberger Journal: Urology Date: 2009-11-14 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Sarah Hartley; Staci Valley; Latoya Kuhn; Laraine L Washer; Tejal Gandhi; Jennifer Meddings; Carol Chenoweth; Anurag N Malani; Sanjay Saint; Arjun Srinivasan; Scott A Flanders Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Julian T Hertz; Richard D Lescallette; Tyler W Barrett; Michael J Ward; Wesley H Self Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Barbara W Trautner; Larissa Grigoryan; Nancy J Petersen; Sylvia Hysong; Jose Cadena; Jan E Patterson; Aanand D Naik Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: J Tobias Nagurney; David F M Brown; Yuchiao Chang; Swati Sane; Andrew C Wang; Justin B Weiner Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Lindsay E Nicolle; Kalpana Gupta; Suzanne F Bradley; Richard Colgan; Gregory P DeMuri; Dimitri Drekonja; Linda O Eckert; Suzanne E Geerlings; Béla Köves; Thomas M Hooton; Manisha Juthani-Mehta; Shandra L Knight; Sanjay Saint; Anthony J Schaeffer; Barbara Trautner; Bjorn Wullt; Reed Siemieniuk Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 9.079