| Literature DB >> 35443974 |
Myles Leslie1,2, Nicole Pinto3, Raad Fadaak3.
Abstract
Vaccination delivery and efforts to counter vaccine hesitancy have become focal issues for family medicine teams as the COVID-19 pandemic has evolved. Conducting action research, our team developed an interactive web-based guide to improve clinical conversations around a broad range of vaccine hesitancies presented by patients. The paper presents a step-by-step account of the guide being codesigned with family physicians-its targeted end users-in a process that included validation interviews; role-play interviews; and user-tested design. The validation interviews sought to understand the pragmatic realities of vaccine hesitancy in family medicine clinical practice relative to relevant psychological theories. The role-play interviews drew out conversational strategies and advice from family physicians. The principles of motivational interviewing-an evidence-based approach to vaccine hesitancy conversations that supplements information deficit approaches-were used to codesign the content and layout of the guide. User counts, stakeholder engagement, and web-based analytics indicate the guide is being used extensively. Formal evaluation of the guide is presently underway.Originally published as Annals "Online First" article.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; action research; motivational interviewing; primary care; simulated patients; vaccine hesitancy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35443974 PMCID: PMC9328713 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Fam Med ISSN: 1544-1709 Impact factor: 5.707