| Literature DB >> 35443666 |
Eiri Shima1, Mina Itsukaichi1, Kosuke Yoshihara1, Tatsuya Ishiguro1, Kazufumi Haino1, Koji Nishino1, Nobumichi Nishikawa1, Koji Nishijima1, Takayuki Enomoto2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our previous study demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of abdominal radical trachelectomy during pregnancy but did not focus on the fetus. This study aimed to clarify the influence of abdominal radical trachelectomy performed during pregnancy on the fetus.Entities:
Keywords: Abdominal radical trachelectomy; Cervical cancer; Fetal growth; Pregnancy
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35443666 PMCID: PMC9022245 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04671-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.105
Patient characteristics and perioperative parameters of ART-DP
| Case No | Age | Stage | Histology | GA at surgery | Uterine arteries | Placenta location (MRI | Progesterone 250 mg im per week | IV tocolysis after surgery | Treatment for threatened preterm delivery | Postsurgical complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | IB1 | SCC | 15–0 | Bil. preserved | Fundus to upper right wall | Until delivery | 27 days | 32-5GA ~ Ritodrine, 33-3GA ~ Ritodrine + MgSO4 | CAM |
| 2 | 33 | IB1 | SCC | 17–0 | Rt. preserved | Fundus to middle anterior wall | Until delivery | 13 days | 23-0GA ~ Ritodrine + MgSO4, 26–5 ~ 28-5GA Ritodrine | Pelvic abscess |
| 3 | 27 | IB1 | SCC | 15–2 | Bil. preserved | Rt. middle to low posterior wall | Until delivery | 5 days | – | None |
| 4 | 30 | IB1 | SCC | 15–6 | Not preserved | Lt. middle to low posterior wall | Until delivery | 8 days | – | None |
| 5 | 27 | IB1 | AD | 15–1 | Bil. preserved | Upper middle posterior wall | Until delivery | 13 days | – | None |
| 6 | 33 | IB1 | SCC | 17–0 | Rt. preserved | Fundus to middle anterior wall | Until delivery | 12 days | – | None |
| 7 | 32 | IB1 | SCC | 15–5 | Bil. preserved | Rt. upper anterior wall | Only 2 weeks | 9 days | – | None |
| 8 | 44 | IB1 | SCC | 16–4 | Bil. preserved | Fundus to posterior wall | Until delivery | 9 days | 25-6GA ~ Ritodrine | None |
GA Gestational age, MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging, im intramuscular injection, SCC Squamous cell carcinoma, AD Adenocarcinoma, Bil bilateral, Rt Right, Lt Left, CAM Chorioamnionitis
aMRI was performed 1–4 weeks before ART-DP
Perinatal parameters and child development
| Case No | Abnormal pregnancy | Preterm birth reason | GA at Cesarean delivery | Birth weight (g) | Birth height (cm) | Neonatal anthropometric | Children’s growth and development (Months following) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Threatened preterm delivery | CAM | 33-5GA | 1820 | 42 | AFD | Normal (90 M) |
| 2 | Preterm PROM | – | 37-3GA | 2572 | 47 | AFD | Normal (89 M) |
| 3 | None | Termination (LVSI +) | 30-4GA | 1462 | 39 | AFD | Normal (81 M) |
| 4 | None | Termination (Surgical margin +) | 33-4GA | 2164 | 46 | AFD | Language development delay (71 M) |
| 5 | None | – | 37-1GA | 2585 | 46 | AFD | Normal (64 M) |
| 6 | None | Termination (Surgical margin +) | 33-0GA | 1742 | 42 | AFD | Normal (53 M) |
| 7 | None | – | 37-3GA | 2996 | 52 | AFD | Normal (40 M) |
| 8 | Threatened preterm delivery | – | 37-4GA | 2294 | 47 | AFD | Normal (9 M) |
CAM Chorioamnionitis, PROM Premature rupture of the membranes, LVSI Lymphovascular invasion, AFD appropriate for date compared with the normal range in the Japanese population
Fig. 1Changes in middle cerebral artery resistance index (MCA-RI) during pregnancy. MCA-RI measurement was performed every week. Each plot represents each value of MCA-RI. The solid line shows the average MCA-RI in each gestational week and the two dotted lines indicate the 10th percentile to 90th percentile. Each plot number corresponds to our case number
Fig. 2Changes in umbilical artery resistance index (UA-RI). Each plot represents each value of UA-RI. The solid line shows the average UA-RI in each gestational week and the two dotted lines indicate the 10th percentile to 90th percentile. Each plot number corresponds to our case number
Fig. 3Changes of estimated fetal body weight (EFBW). Each dot represents EFBW for each gestational date. The solid line shows the average EFBW of the Japanese population in each gestational week. The zone between the two dotted lines is − 1.5 to 1.5 standard deviations. Each plot number corresponds to our case number