| Literature DB >> 35443606 |
Marwa M Eldemerdash1, Ashraf S A El-Sayed2, Hussein A Hussein3, Samir S Teleb3, Rania S Shehata3,4.
Abstract
The genus Cassia and Senna have been classified under subfamily Caesalpinioideae of family Fabaceae (Leguminosae) of order Fabales. There is a scarce taxonomical studies of the genus Cassia and Senna inhabiting Egyptian environments, thus, the main objective of the current was to revise and authenticate the phylogenetic relationship between studied taxa of the species of the genera Cassia and Senna in Egypt using the recent tools of ITS barcoding, RAPD analysis and metabolic profiling, in comparing to the traditional taxonomical features. From the cluster analysis of the traditional 27 morphological characters, the studied taxa were categorized into two major clades with an average taxonomic distance of 4.3. The clade I include Cassia fistula, C. renigera, C. javanica L subsp. nodosa and C. roughiia that belongs to series Obolospermae, and C. grandis that belongs to series Grandes. The clade (II) includes Senna surattensis and S. alata at taxonomic level 3.6. The taxonomical description of the studied taxa was confirmed from the molecular analysis of ITS sequences and RAPD analysis. The ITS sequences of the tested plants species C. fistula L, C. grandis MD4, C. javanica subsp. nodosa MD7, C. roxburghii MD5, C. renigera MD5 were deposited at genbank with accession numbers MW367973, MZ960447, MW386305, MW326753 and MW32685, respectively. While, the ITS sequences of the S. surrattensis and S. alata were deposited into genbank accession # MD14 MW367670 and MD20 MW412635, respectively. Thus, from the molecular analysis, two clades were clearly separated into Clade I of Cassia and Clade II of Senna. The cluster I represented by C. fistula, C. renigera, C. roxburghii, and C. javanica sub nodosa, and the cluster II represented by S. alata and S. surattensis. From the PCA of RAPD, a clearly discrimination between the two Taxa was observed revealing the characteristic grouping of Cassia and Senna. The species Senna alata and Senna surattensis were grouped together, but the species of C. renigera, C. javanica, C. roxburghii and C. grandis was grouped on a distinct group. The separation of Cassia and Senna species into two clusters verify the segregation of the genus Cassia L. senso lato into two distinct genera namely Senna P. and Cassia L. The morphological, molecular traits of the studied plants were authenticated from the metabolic profiling by GC-MS analysis. Among the 23 identified metabolites, four compounds namely hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester, 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-ethyl ester and Vitamin E were detected with fluctuated concentrations, among C. fistula, C. grandis, C. javanica subsp. nodosa and C. roxburghii. Conclusively, the traditional morphological features, molecular barcoding using ITS sequences, RAPD analysis and metabolic traits by GC-MS analysis, authenticates the taxonomical diversity of the genus Cassia and Senna.Entities:
Keywords: Cassia; GC-MS profile; ITS sequence; RAPD analysis; Senna; Taxonomical features
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35443606 PMCID: PMC9020050 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-03543-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 5.260
The collection data of the taxa studied of Cassia and their assignment into their corresponding series [4]
| Taxa | ID number | Locality | longitude & latitude | Series |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZUBG-09 | Parks at Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. | 30.5765°N 31.5041°E | ||
| ZBG-008 | Zohria Trial Gardens, Gezira, Giza, Egypt. | 30.0131°N 31.2089°E | ||
| OBG-109 | Orman Botanic Garden, Giza, Egypt. | |||
| OBG-104 | Orman Botanic Garden, Giza, Egypt. | |||
| OBG-101 | Orman Botanic Garden, Giza, Egypt. | |||
| ZBG-006 | Zohria Trial Gardens, Gezira, Giza, Egypt | Subverrucosae | ||
| Cairo University Botanical Garden | 30.0444° N 31.235° E | Pictae |
ZUBG Zagazig University Botanical Garden, ZBG Zohria Botanical Garden, OBG Orman Botanical Garden, CUBG Cairo University Botanical garden
Primer sequence of ITS and RAPD analysis
| Name | Base Pair Primers (bp) | Prime Primer Sequence (5-3) | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAPID | ABI-07 | 10 bp | GGTGACGCAG | |
| ABI-08 | 10 bp | GTCCACACGG | ||
| ABI-09 | 10 bp | TGGGGGACTC | ||
| ABI-10 | 10 bp | CTGCTGGGAC | ||
| ABI-11 | 10 bp | GTAGACCCGT | ||
| ABI-12 | 10 bp | CCTTGACGCA | ||
| ITS | ITS2 2F | 20 bp | ATGCGATACTTGGTGTGAAT | Chen et al., [ |
| ITS2 3R | 21 bp | GACGCTTCTCCAGACTACAAT | Gao et al., [ |
Morhological charcaters of Cassia and Senna
| Character | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Life Span | perennial | perennial | perennial | perennial | perennial | perennial | perennial |
| 2-Life form | Tree | Tree | Tree | Tree | Tree | Shrub | Shrub |
| 3-stem surfaces | glabrous | pubescent | pubescent | pubescent | pubescent | pubescent | pubescent |
| 4-Leaf duration | deciduous | deciduous | deciduous | deciduous | deciduous | evergreen | evergreen |
| 5-Leaflet pairs in numbers | 8-14 pairs | 14-20paris | 16-20pairs | 14-20 pairs | 16-20 pairs | 8-12 pairs | 6-12 pairs |
| 6-Leaflet shape | ovate | oblong | oblong | oblong | oblong | obovate-oblong | obovate-oblong |
| 7-Leaflet margin | entire | entire | entire | entire | entire | entire | entire |
| 8-Leaflet apex. | acute | obtuse | obtuse | obtuse | acute | obtuse | obtuse |
| 9-Leaflet base | Obtuse | Obtuse | Obtuse | Oblique | Obtuse | Oblique | Oblique |
| 10-Leaflet adaxial surface | glabrous | puberulent | puberulent | glabrous | puberulent | glabrous | glabrous |
| 11-Leaflet abaxial surface | puberulent | tomentose | tomentose | puberulent | puberulent | puberulent | puberulent |
| 12-Leaflet lenght | 7.5-15 cm | 5-7 cm | 5-10 cm | 7-10 cm | 5.5-10 | 6-12 cm | 2-5 cm |
| 13- Leaflet width | 2.5-7 cm | 1-2 cm | 0.4 -2 cm | 1-2 cm | 0,6-2 cm | 3-6 cm | 0.8-2 cm |
| 14- Stipule | cauducous | cauducous | cauducous | cauducous | cauducous | Persistent | cauducous |
| 15- Stipule shape | deltoid to ovate | deltoid to ovate | kidney | kidney | linear to lanceolate | Triangular | linear to lanceolate |
| 16-Bract shape | ovate | Linear to lanceolate | leafy | Linear | Ovate | oblong to broadly ovate | linear to lanceolate |
| 17- Sepals shape | ovate | ovate | ovate | ovate | ovate | oblong | ovate |
| 18-Sepals colour | green | redish | redish | redish | redish | yellowish-green | yellowish-green |
| 19- Petals shape | obovate | obovate | obovate | Ovate Oblong | obovate | ovate | obovate |
| 20- Petals colour | yellow | pink | pink | pink | pink | yellow | yellow |
| 21-pod Curvature | straight | straight | straight | straight | straight | straight | straight |
| 22- Pod colour | Black | Dark brown | Dark brown | Dark brown | Dark brown | brown | Dark brown |
| 23- Pod Texture | glabrous | glabrous | glabrous | glabrous | glabrous | glabrous | hairy |
| 24- POD APEX | rounded | rounded | rounded | rounded | rounded | ACUMINATE | rounded |
| 25- Dehiscence of pod | indehiscent | indehiscent | indehiscent | indehiscent | indehiscent | dehiscent | dehiscent |
| 26- Seed shape | elliptic | obovate-elliptic | obovate-elliptic | elliptic | obovate-elliptic | deltoid | obovate-oblong |
| 27- Seed color | Brown | Brown | Brown | Brown | Brown | Black | Dark brown |
The studied taxa, location and their geographical distribution
| Scientific name | NCBI accession No. | Length bp | GC% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1- | MW367973 | ||
| 2- | MZ960447 | 439 bp | |
| 3- | MW326851 | ||
| 4- | MW326753 | ||
| 5- | MW386305 | ||
| 6- | MW367670 | ||
| MW412635 |
Fig. 1UPGMA analysis (A) an PCA analysis (B) of Cassia and Senna species based on the morphological features
Fig. 2Molecular Phylogenetic analysis of the Cassia species based the ITS sequences for Cassia fistula (A), Cassia grandis (B), Cassia renigera (C) and Cassia javanica subsp nodosa (D)
Fig. 3Molecular Phylogenetic analysis of the Cassia and Senna species based the ITS sequences of S. surrattensis (A), S. alata (B), C. roxburghi (C). The phylogenetic relatedness of the Cassia and Senna
Maximum composite likelihood estimate of the pattern of nucleotide substitution
| A | T | C | G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | ||||
| – | ||||
| – | ||||
| – |
Each entry shows the probability of substitution (r) from one base (row) to another base (column) [1]. For simplicity, the sum of r values is made equal to 100. Rates of different transitional substitutions are shown in bold and those of transversionsal substitutions are shown in italics. The nucleotide frequencies are 20.86% (A), 18.83% (T/U), 29.65% (C), and 30.67% (G). The transition/ transversion rate ratios are k = 1.704 (purines) and k = 3.238 (pyrimidines). The overall transition/ transversion bias is R = 1.16, where R = [A*G*k + T*C*k]/[(A + G)*(T + C)]. This analysis involved 7 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Noncoding. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There were a total of 837 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X [2]
Nucleotide diversity, sequence polymorphism based on ribosomal DNA of Cassia and Senna species
| Parameter | Frequency |
|---|---|
This analysis involved 7 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Noncoding. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There were a total of 837 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X [2]
Abbreviations: m Number of sequences, n Total number of sites, S Number of segregating sites, C Conserved sites, ps S/n, Θ ps/a1, π nucleotide diversity, and Total number of mutations, Eta Eta
Fig. 4UPGMA analysis of based on the RAPD Markers of seven different taxa of Cassia & Senna generated. A RPAD profile analysis of the experimented plants with the different primers, B PCA analysis of the tested plants based on the RAPD profile
Analysis of polymorphism among species of Cassia and Senna obtained with 6 random primers
| Primers name | Primer Sequence (5′-3′) | Size Range of Amplified Product (bp) | Total no. of amplicon | Total number of bands | No of Monomorphic bands | Number of Polymorphic bands | (%) Polymorphism | PIC = 2 × fi × (1-fi) | MI=PIC × Number of Polymorphic bands |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABI-07 | GGTGACGCAG | 1000-100 | 27 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 100 | 0.35 | 2.8 |
| ABI-08 | GTCCACACGG | 1000-180 | 27 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 87.5 | 0.33 | 2.31 |
| ABI-09 | TGGGGGACTC | 1200-250 | 24 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 100 | 0.45 | 4.05 |
| ABI-10 | CTGCTGGGAC | 1200-200 | 21 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 100 | 0.40 | 3.2 |
| ABI-11 | GTAGACCCGT | 1200-200 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 100 | 0.39 | 2.34 |
| ABI-12 | CCTTGACGCA | 900-100 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 100 | 0.34 | 2.72 |
| Total | 130 | 47 | 46 | ||||||
| Average | 0.37 |
Jaccard’s coeffcient of similarity indices between 7 species of Cassia and senna as revealed from RAPD using 6 primer
| Taxa | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The identified phytocompounds in the methanolic extracts of leaves of the taxa studied of Cassia and Senna
| RT | Phytocompounds | MF | MW | Chemical class | Area % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sp | sp | sp | sp | sp | Sp6 | Sp7 | |||||
| 17.97 | Cyclooctasiloxane, hexadecamethyl- | C16H48O8Si8 | 592 | Organosiloxane | 0.60 | 1.23 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 21.01 | 1-Hexadecanol | C16H34O | 242 | Cetyl alcohol (16 C fatty alcohol) | – | 2.06 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 22.85 | 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol | C14H22O | 206 | Alkyl benzene | – | 2.57 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 23.24 | 2,6-Diflurobenzoic acid, tridec-2-ynyl ester | C20H26F2O2 | 336 | Ester | – | – | 1.55 | – | – | – | – |
| 23.55 | Phenol, 2-propyl- | C9H12O | 136 | Propyl phenol | – | – | – | – | 1.70 | – | – |
| 26.69 | 1-Nonadecene | C19H38 | 266 | Un-branched 19 C alkene | – | 5.48 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 27.07 | Guanosine | C10H13N5O5 | 283 | Purine nucleoside | – | – | – | – | 6.38 | – | |
| 28.08 | Neophytadiene | C20H38 | 278 | Diene Hydrocarbon | 4.63 | – | 3.87 | 3.16 | – | – | – |
| 28.94 | Tetradecanoic acid | C14H28O2 | 228 | Fatty acid | – | – | – | – | 1.37 | – | – |
| 32.54 | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | C17H34O2 | 270 | Fatty acid ester | 2.44 | 12.45 | 3.93 | 3.46 | 2.44 | – | – |
| 34.01 | Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | C18H36O2 | 284 | Fatty acid ester | 4.59 | 0.63 | 5.13 | 3.67 | 4.14 | 5.5 | 5.7 |
| 36.04 | Myo-Inositol, 2-C-methyl- | C7H14O6 | 194 | Carbocyclic sugar | – | – | – | 46.5 | 19.86 | 49.59 | – |
| 36.83 | Phytol | C20H40O | 296 | Acyclic diterpene alcohol | – | – | 11.99 | – | – | ||
| 37.23 | 16-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester | C19H36O2 | 296 | Fatty acid ester | 3.07 | – | 3.96 | 3.61 | 4.06 | ||
| 37.26 | 9-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester (E)- | C19H36O2 | 296 | Fatty acid ester | – | 15.81 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 37.61 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester | C19H34O2 | 294 | Fatty acid ester | – | 10.06 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 38.54 | 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, ethyl ester | C20H38O2 | 310 | Fatty acid ester | 7.13 | 1.15 | 9.30 | 8.63 | 3.58 | ||
| 40.60 | Oleic acid | C18H34O2 | 282 | Fatty acid | 2.93 | – | 1.43 | 1.25 | 0.82 | – | – |
| 43.80 | Meadowlactone | C20H38O2 | 310 | Delta-lactone | – | – | 4.47 | – | – | – | – |
| 45.72 | 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl ester | C21H40O4 | 356 | Monoacylglycerol | 2.08 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 48.62 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester | C24H38O4 | 390 | Aromatic dicarboxylic acid ester (Ester) | 1.44 | 1.75 | 1.00 | – | 0.71 | – | – |
| 53.68 | Docosanoic acid, 1,2,3-propanetriyl ester | C69H134O6 | 1058 | Fatty acid ester | 1.38 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 58.49 | Vitamin E | C29H50O2 | 430 | Fat-soluble vitamin | 5.11 | 0.64 | 18.67 | 3.57 | 1.39 | ||
- Absent, MF Molecular formula, MW Molecular weight, spCassia fistula, spCassia grandis, spCassia javanica subsp. nodosa, spCassia renigera, spCassia roxburghii, Senna alata, sp6 Senna surattensis
Fig. 5GC-MS chromatogram of methanol leaf extract of Cassia fistula and Cassia grandis
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7GC-MS chromatogram of methanol leaf extract of Senna alata, and Senna surattensis