Literature DB >> 35443020

Convalescent plasma with a high level of virus-specific antibody effectively neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

Maggie Li1, Evan J Beck2, Oliver Laeyendecker2, Yolanda Eby3, Aaron A R Tobian3, Patrizio Caturegli3, Camille Wouters1, Gregory R Chiklis4, William Block5, Robert O McKie6, Michael J Joyner7, Timothy D Wiltshire8, Allan B Dietz8, Thomas J Gniadek9, Arell J Shapiro10, Anusha Yarava11, Karen Lane11, Daniel F Hanley11, Evan M Bloch3, Shmuel Shoham12, Edward R Cachay13, Barry R Meisenberg14, Moises A Huaman15, Yuriko Fukuta16, Bela Patel17, Sonya L Heath18, Adam C Levine19, James H Paxton20, Shweta Anjan21, Jonathan M Gerber22, Kelly A Gebo2, Arturo Casadevall1, Andrew Pekosz1, David J Sullivan1.   

Abstract

The ongoing evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants severely limits available effective monoclonal antibody therapies. Effective drugs are also supply limited. COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) qualified for high antibody levels effectively reduces immunocompetent outpatient hospitalization. The Food and Drug Administration currently allows outpatient CCP for the immunosuppressed. Viral-specific antibody levels in CCP can range 10- to 100-fold between donors, unlike the uniform viral-specific monoclonal antibody dosing. Limited data are available on the efficacy of polyclonal CCP to neutralize variants. We examined 108 pre-δ/pre-ο donor units obtained before March 2021, 20 post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination units, and 1 pre-δ/pre-ο hyperimmunoglobulin preparation for variant-specific virus (vaccine-related isolate [WA-1], δ, and ο) neutralization correlated to Euroimmun S1 immunoglobulin G antibody levels. We observed a two- to fourfold and 20- to 40-fold drop in virus neutralization from SARS-CoV-2 WA-1 to δ or ο, respectively. CCP antibody levels in the upper 10% of the 108 donations as well as 100% of the post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination units and the hyperimmunoglobulin effectively neutralized all 3 variants. High-titer CCP neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 variants despite no previous donor exposure to the variants. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35443020      PMCID: PMC9023079          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


Introduction

Commercial serologic assays predictive of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and variant neutralization are important for effective clinical use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) because substantial heterogeneity exists in CCP donor responses with higher antibody levels associated with virus neutralization.1, 2, 3 The SARS-CoV-2 ○ variant BA.1 rendered many monoclonals ineffective in laboratory virus neutralization tests, necessitating their removal as outpatient monoclonal therapies for acute COVID-19.4, 5 Although Sotrovimab retained activity against ○ BA.1, activity was lost against the BA.1.1 and BA.2 ○ variants. Tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld), approved only for preexposure prophylaxis, was ineffective at neutralizing ○ BA.2 and showed reduced activity toward Omicrons BA.1 and BA.1.1. Bebtelovimab neutralizes ○ BA.1 but will have limited availability. A recent large clinical trial over the period from June 2020 to October 2021 demonstrated that early outpatient CCP reduced the risk of hospitalizations by more than half. Ninety percent of the trial's >300 unique CCP donor units were collected prior to January 2021, representing nonvaccinated pre-α/δ/○ variant plasma. In December 2021, the Food and Drug Administration extended CCP from hospital use to immunosuppressed outpatients while simultaneously increasing commercial serologic benchmarks by 1.5-fold for CCP qualification. Recent ○ variant studies measured virus neutralization without concomitant commercial serologic testing for general antibody levels. Wang and colleagues measured a 10-fold virus neutralization reduction from SARS-CoV-2 wild-type to ○ in 16 individual plasma samples obtained from January to March 2020 in China. Röllser et al examined only 10 CCP units from donors infected with variants and showed a lack of CCP neutralization of ○ but substantial neutralization with post–COVID-19 postvaccination plasma. These studies have only tested a few samples and do not correlate the results to a commercial assay necessary to qualify therapeutic CCP units. Considering that CCP donors vary significantly in terms of virus neutralization capacity, the use of commercial assays that predict neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 and its variants becomes important to select the optimal therapeutic CCP units. This study tested a total of 129 samples: 108 CCP donor units, 20 post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination donor units, and 1 pre-δ/pre-○ hyperimmunoglobulin preparation for ability to neutralize 3 SARS-CoV-2 isolates/variants (WA-1, δ, and ○), correlating results to the Euroimmun spike-S1 antibody plasma level.

Methods

Participants

After the outpatient clinical research trial transfusions from >300 unique donors were complete, 108 remnant-qualified (positive antibody presence after 1:320 dilution using a validated spike protein Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) donor plasma units were available for WA-1, δ, and ○ virus neutralizations. Seventy-one out of 108 (66%) pre-δ/pre-○ units were donated before January 2021. Approvals were obtained from the institutional review boards at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine as single Institutional Review Board for all participating sites and the Department of Defense Human Research Protection Office. All participants provided written informed consent. The 20 post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination (1 J&J Ad26.COV2.S, 5 Moderna mRNA-1273, and 14 Pfizer BNT162b2) plasma aliquots were obtained from Innovative Transfusion Medicine after research informed consent for CCP collection. The collections occurred late August through October 2021, representing δ variant infection. The viral strain associated to convalescent plasma was associated by timing of donation to existing variants, not sequence confirmed. The hyperimmunoglobulin sample was prepared from 101 CCP units, collected between 16 June 2020 and 13 January 2021 (representing pre-δ/pre-○ plasma) from recovered patients by an apheresis plasma collection technique following Mayo Clinic Blood Donor Center's standard operating procedures. Pooled plasma was loaded on the protein A resin to capture immunoglobulin G at a neutral pH, washed to remove low affinity proteins, and eluted at low pH. The final product was formulated as a 5% protein solution in glycine/acetic acid.

Microneutralization studies

Plasma neutralizing antibodies were determined as described for SARS-CoV-2.1, 12 WA-1 (SARS-CoV-2/USA-WA1/2020 EPI_ISL_404895) was obtained from BEI Resources, and the δ (hCoV19/USA/MD-HP05660/2021 EPI_ISL_2331507) and ○ (hCoV19/USA/MD-HP20874/2021 EPI_ISL_7160424) variants were isolated from COVID-19 patients at Johns Hopkins Hospital as previously described. The neutralizing antibodies titer was calculated as the highest serum dilution that eliminated the cytopathic effect in 50% of the wells (NT50), and the area under the curve was calculated using Graphpad Prism. The total plasma levels of antibodies against spike region S1 were measured using the ELISA Euroimmun assay as described.

Results and discussion

Compared with the WA-1 isolate, we observed a two- to fourfold decrease in virus neutralization of δ and 20- to 40-fold neutralization decrease of ○ in all plasma samples (108 pre-δ/pre-○ CCP units, the 20 post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination units, and pre-δ/pre-○ hyperimmunoglobulin) (Figure 1 ). The 108 research trial remnant units with Euroimmun AU over 3.5 have an 85% rate of positive virus neutralization for WA-1 and δ. However, Euroimmun over 10 AU was necessary to retain similar neutralization for ○ (Figure 1). All of the post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination donor plasma as well as the hyperimmunoglobulin, with Euroimmun AU over 10, effectively neutralized the WA-1 isolate, δ and ○ variants. As a benchmark for clinical effectiveness, the early treatment CCP trial, successful at preventing hospitalizations principally with unvaccinated ancestral virus, had >10% of pre-δ/pre-○ 2020 prevaccination donor units or 2021 donor units with Euroimmun AU over 10 (Figure 1). For all these clinical trial transfused units, the WA-1 neutralizing antibody geometric mean (geomean) was 26 IU/mL, whereas remnant 108 CCP plasma units had a geomean of 28 IU/mL. However, sorting to increasing Euroimmun AUs from >3.5 to 7 and to 10 AUs increased twofold and 10-fold, respectively, WA-1, δ, and ○ neutralization (Figure 2 ). All of the post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination samples measured Euroimmun AU over 10, with WA-1 neutralization at geomean 1598 with comparable reduction in δ activity of twofold and 20-fold with ○ (Figure 2). The pre-δ/pre-○ hyperimmune globulin immunoglobulin G showed a similar fold decrease in neutralization across the 3 isolates (Figure 2). The wider span of both high and low levels of neutralization antibodies in CCP may account for the larger decrease in δ activity compared with the narrower high range of virus neutralizations with the post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination units. This data suggests that Euroimmun AU over 5 (˜1.5 × 3.5) would be effective for δ and over 10 (˜3 × 3.5) for ○ CCP therapy.
Figure 1

Reduction in virus neutralization sorted by plasma type as well as an increase by Euroimmun antibody levels. (A) WA-1, δ, and ○ virus microneutralization sorted by the 108 CCP units, post-δ COVID-19/post vaccination, and hyperimmunoglobin. IU/mL geomeans are shown above x-axis. (B) Antibody levels over 3.5 Euroimmun AU show 85% microneutralization with WA-1 and δ, whereas ○ neutralization requires Euroimmun AU over 10 for 85% of the 108 CCP donors. Post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination retains 100% virus neutralization for the 3 variants. Virus neutralization is any positive IU/mL over 1. (C) Range of Euroimmun antibody levels sorted by prevaccination 2020 donor collections and early January to March 2021 for the large number of clinical trial donors and the 108 remnant donors. Geomeans near x-axis and number above 10 AU in red above values. More than 10% of units have Euroimmun AU over 10 except for the 2020 remnant units. Three of the 12 2021 108 donors were vaccinated along with documented COVID-19. The vaccine status of the other 9 was not recorded at time of donation. The P values were Tukey's multiple comparisons of 1-way ANOVA. ****P < .0001; ***P < .001; **P < .01. AU, arbitrary units.

Figure 2

Sorting higher Euroimmun categories indicates virus neutralization to WA-1, δ, and ○. WA-1 (A), δ (B), and ○ (C) virus microneutralization measured in CCP, post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination, and hyperimmune globulin (HIG) sorted for viral-specific antibody levels by Euroimmun AU at 1:101 dilution. IU/mL geometric means are shown above x-axis. The ratio of donor plasma neutralizations to total tested is shown below x-axis (neutralization number/total number).The P values were Tukey's multiple comparisons of 1-way ANOVA. ****P < .0001; ***P < .001; **P < .01; *P < .05.

Reduction in virus neutralization sorted by plasma type as well as an increase by Euroimmun antibody levels. (A) WA-1, δ, and ○ virus microneutralization sorted by the 108 CCP units, post-δ COVID-19/post vaccination, and hyperimmunoglobin. IU/mL geomeans are shown above x-axis. (B) Antibody levels over 3.5 Euroimmun AU show 85% microneutralization with WA-1 and δ, whereas ○ neutralization requires Euroimmun AU over 10 for 85% of the 108 CCP donors. Post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination retains 100% virus neutralization for the 3 variants. Virus neutralization is any positive IU/mL over 1. (C) Range of Euroimmun antibody levels sorted by prevaccination 2020 donor collections and early January to March 2021 for the large number of clinical trial donors and the 108 remnant donors. Geomeans near x-axis and number above 10 AU in red above values. More than 10% of units have Euroimmun AU over 10 except for the 2020 remnant units. Three of the 12 2021 108 donors were vaccinated along with documented COVID-19. The vaccine status of the other 9 was not recorded at time of donation. The P values were Tukey's multiple comparisons of 1-way ANOVA. ****P < .0001; ***P < .001; **P < .01. AU, arbitrary units. Sorting higher Euroimmun categories indicates virus neutralization to WA-1, δ, and ○. WA-1 (A), δ (B), and ○ (C) virus microneutralization measured in CCP, post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination, and hyperimmune globulin (HIG) sorted for viral-specific antibody levels by Euroimmun AU at 1:101 dilution. IU/mL geometric means are shown above x-axis. The ratio of donor plasma neutralizations to total tested is shown below x-axis (neutralization number/total number).The P values were Tukey's multiple comparisons of 1-way ANOVA. ****P < .0001; ***P < .001; **P < .01; *P < .05. Commercial serologic assays were adjusted ˜1.5-fold by the Food and Drug Administration to be in the effective range for ○. The Euroimmun assay is one of many that can be used for donor plasma qualification. Many published studies on variant virus neutralization by CCP characterize 10 to 30 individual donors, deeming them inactive against variants with small sample sizes. In contrast, here we compared over 100 CCP donor units to show that high viral-specific antibodies defined by commercial serologic tests indicates ○ neutralization. The post-δ COVID-19/postvaccination donor units and hyperimmune globulin retain broad activity against variants through ○, indicating the improved potential efficacy of a polyclonal antibody treatment compared with monoclonal antibody treatments as a way to keep up as a therapeutic tool against the evolving virus. This study did not characterize ○ convalescent plasma neutralization of older variants. Another limitation is the use of only in vitro data, for which the true relevance to clinical use is not known. We posit that high-titer polyclonal CCP donors characterized with commercial serologic assays with a mismatch to existing variants still neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants as well as lower titer donor plasma units with a direct match of plasma-to-virus variants. These polyclonal high-titer units and hyperimmune globulin retain efficacy as antibody therapy in the face of variants.
  11 in total

1.  Considerable escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron to antibody neutralization.

Authors:  Delphine Planas; Nell Saunders; Piet Maes; Florence Guivel-Benhassine; Cyril Planchais; Julian Buchrieser; William-Henry Bolland; Françoise Porrot; Isabelle Staropoli; Frederic Lemoine; Hélène Péré; David Veyer; Julien Puech; Julien Rodary; Guy Baele; Simon Dellicour; Joren Raymenants; Sarah Gorissen; Caspar Geenen; Bert Vanmechelen; Tony Wawina-Bokalanga; Joan Martí-Carreras; Lize Cuypers; Aymeric Sève; Laurent Hocqueloux; Thierry Prazuck; Félix A Rey; Etienne Simon-Loriere; Timothée Bruel; Hugo Mouquet; Emmanuel André; Olivier Schwartz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Broadly neutralizing antibodies overcome SARS-CoV-2 Omicron antigenic shift.

Authors:  Elisabetta Cameroni; John E Bowen; Laura E Rosen; Christian Saliba; Samantha K Zepeda; Katja Culap; Dora Pinto; Laura A VanBlargan; Anna De Marco; Julia di Iulio; Fabrizia Zatta; Hannah Kaiser; Julia Noack; Nisar Farhat; Nadine Czudnochowski; Colin Havenar-Daughton; Kaitlin R Sprouse; Josh R Dillen; Abigail E Powell; Alex Chen; Cyrus Maher; Li Yin; David Sun; Leah Soriaga; Jessica Bassi; Chiara Silacci-Fregni; Claes Gustafsson; Nicholas M Franko; Jenni Logue; Najeeha Talat Iqbal; Ignacio Mazzitelli; Jorge Geffner; Renata Grifantini; Helen Chu; Andrea Gori; Agostino Riva; Olivier Giannini; Alessandro Ceschi; Paolo Ferrari; Pietro E Cippà; Alessandra Franzetti-Pellanda; Christian Garzoni; Peter J Halfmann; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; Christy Hebner; Lisa A Purcell; Luca Piccoli; Matteo Samuele Pizzuto; Alexandra C Walls; Michael S Diamond; Amalio Telenti; Herbert W Virgin; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Gyorgy Snell; David Veesler; Davide Corti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 69.504

3.  LY-CoV1404 (bebtelovimab) potently neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Authors:  Kathryn Westendorf; Stefanie Žentelis; Lingshu Wang; Denisa Foster; Peter Vaillancourt; Matthew Wiggin; Erica Lovett; Robin van der Lee; Jörg Hendle; Anna Pustilnik; J Michael Sauder; Lucas Kraft; Yuri Hwang; Robert W Siegel; Jinbiao Chen; Beverly A Heinz; Richard E Higgs; Nicole L Kallewaard; Kevin Jepson; Rodrigo Goya; Maia A Smith; David W Collins; Davide Pellacani; Ping Xiang; Valentine de Puyraimond; Marketa Ricicova; Lindsay Devorkin; Caitlin Pritchard; Aoise O'Neill; Kush Dalal; Pankaj Panwar; Harveer Dhupar; Fabian A Garces; Courtney A Cohen; John M Dye; Kathleen E Huie; Catherine V Badger; Darwyn Kobasa; Jonathan Audet; Joshua J Freitas; Saleema Hassanali; Ina Hughes; Luis Munoz; Holly C Palma; Bharathi Ramamurthy; Robert W Cross; Thomas W Geisbert; Vineet Menachery; Kumari Lokugamage; Viktoriya Borisevich; Iliana Lanz; Lisa Anderson; Payal Sipahimalani; Kizzmekia S Corbett; Eun Sung Yang; Yi Zhang; Wei Shi; Tongqing Zhou; Misook Choe; John Misasi; Peter D Kwong; Nancy J Sullivan; Barney S Graham; Tara L Fernandez; Carl L Hansen; Ester Falconer; John R Mascola; Bryan E Jones; Bryan C Barnhart
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 9.995

4.  Comparative Performance of Five Commercially Available Serologic Assays To Detect Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and Identify Individuals with High Neutralizing Titers.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; Oliver Laeyendecker; Eshan U Patel; Evan M Bloch; William Clarke; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Denali Boon; Yolanda Eby; Reinaldo E Fernandez; Owen R Baker; Morgan Keruly; Charles S Kirby; Ethan Klock; Kirsten Littlefield; Jernelle Miller; Haley A Schmidt; Philip Sullivan; Estelle Piwowar-Manning; Ruchee Shrestha; Andrew D Redd; Richard E Rothman; David Sullivan; Shmuel Shoham; Arturo Casadevall; Thomas C Quinn; Andrew Pekosz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Clinical Validity of Serum Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 : A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Giorgio Caturegli; Joshua Materi; Brittney M Howard; Patrizio Caturegli
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Neutralization in Serum from Vaccinated and Convalescent Persons.

Authors:  Annika Rössler; Lydia Riepler; David Bante; Dorothee von Laer; Janine Kimpel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant to convalescent and CoronaVac vaccine plasma.

Authors:  Yingdan Wang; Yunping Ma; Yan Xu; Jiangyan Liu; Xiang Li; Yuyuan Chen; Yan Chen; Jun Xie; Lianbo Xiao; Zheng Xiang; Fan Wu; Jinghe Huang
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 7.163

8.  The displacement of the SARS-CoV-2 variant Delta with Omicron: An investigation of hospital admissions and upper respiratory viral loads.

Authors:  Amary Fall; Raghda E Eldesouki; Jaiprasath Sachithanandham; C Paul Morris; Julie M Norton; David C Gaston; Michael Forman; Omar Abdullah; Nicholas Gallagher; Maggie Li; Nicholas J Swanson; Andrew Pekosz; Eili Y Klein; Heba H Mostafa
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  An immunosuppressed Syrian golden hamster model for SARS-CoV infection.

Authors:  Scott R Schaecher; Jennifer Stabenow; Christina Oberle; Jill Schriewer; R Mark Buller; John E Sagartz; Andrew Pekosz
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.616

10.  Association between SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies and Commercial Serological Assays.

Authors:  Mei San Tang; James Brett Case; Caroline E Franks; Rita E Chen; Neil W Anderson; Jeffrey P Henderson; Michael S Diamond; Ann M Gronowski; Christopher W Farnsworth
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  4 in total

1.  Multi-center matched cohort study of convalescent plasma for hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Cindy Ke Zhou; Monica M Bennett; Carlos H Villa; Kendall P Hammonds; Yun Lu; Jason Ettlinger; Elisa L Priest; Robert L Gottlieb; Steven Davis; Edward Mays; Tainya C Clarke; Azadeh Shoaibi; Hui-Lee Wong; Steven A Anderson; Ronan J Kelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Clinical Practice Guidelines From the Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies (AABB): COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma.

Authors:  Lise J Estcourt; Claudia S Cohn; Monica B Pagano; Claire Iannizzi; Nina Kreuzberger; Nicole Skoetz; Elizabeth S Allen; Evan M Bloch; Gregory Beaudoin; Arturo Casadevall; Dana V Devine; Farid Foroutan; Thomas J Gniadek; Ruchika Goel; Jed Gorlin; Brenda J Grossman; Michael J Joyner; Ryan A Metcalf; Jay S Raval; Todd W Rice; Beth H Shaz; Ralph R Vassallo; Jeffrey L Winters; Aaron A R Tobian
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 51.598

3.  Analysis of anti-Omicron neutralizing antibody titers in different convalescent plasma sources.

Authors:  Daniele Focosi; Massimo Franchini; Michael J Joyner; Arturo Casadevall; David J Sullivan
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 4.  Convalescent plasma and COVID-19: Time for a second-second look?

Authors:  Michael J Joyner; Rickey E Carter; DeLisa Fairweather; R Scott Wright
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 2.057

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.