Mina Lobbous1,2, L Burt Nabors3,4, Andrew B DeAtkine5, Moaaz Abdelrashid6, Zach Tucker1, Amitkumar Mehta7, James M Markert6,2, Jinsuh Kim8, John B Fiveash9, Robert A Oster2,10. 1. Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, FOT 1020 | 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA. 2. O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 3. Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, FOT 1020 | 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA. bnabors@uabmc.edu. 4. O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. bnabors@uabmc.edu. 5. Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 6. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 7. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 8. Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 9. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 10. Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive tumor that is confined to the CNS. Although the provision of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) has remarkably improved outcomes in PCNSL patients, the optimal treatment regimens and standard MTX dose for induction therapy have been largely controversial. Herein, we sought to explore the impact of adjuvant rituximab and different dosages of induction HD-MTX on survival outcomes of immunocompetent patients with PCNSL. METHODS: In this study, we examined patients with PCNSL treated at a single NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center to evaluate their survival outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 51 immunocompetent patients with PCNSL who received their induction chemotherapy at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) between 2001 and 2019. Only adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL who had either HD-MTX alone or in combination with rituximab were included. Patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: There is no significant difference in survival among patients who received MTX alone versus MTX plus rituximab (HR = 0.996 (95% CI: 0.398-2.493), p = 0.994). Lower doses of MTX were associated with worse survival outcomes (HR = 0.680 (95% CI: 0.530-0.872), p = 0.002); however, this difference in survival was not significant when adjusted to age (HR = 0.797 (95% CI: 0.584-1.088), p = 0.153). CONCLUSION: Our experience challenges the role of rituximab in PCNSL during induction therapy. Our study also highlights the shorter survival in elderly patients with PCNSL which can be related, to some extent, to the relatively lower doses of HD-MTX. There is an unmet need to establish a consensus on the most effective upfront regimen in PCNSL through prospective studies.
PURPOSE: Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive tumor that is confined to the CNS. Although the provision of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) has remarkably improved outcomes in PCNSL patients, the optimal treatment regimens and standard MTX dose for induction therapy have been largely controversial. Herein, we sought to explore the impact of adjuvant rituximab and different dosages of induction HD-MTX on survival outcomes of immunocompetent patients with PCNSL. METHODS: In this study, we examined patients with PCNSL treated at a single NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center to evaluate their survival outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 51 immunocompetent patients with PCNSL who received their induction chemotherapy at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) between 2001 and 2019. Only adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL who had either HD-MTX alone or in combination with rituximab were included. Patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: There is no significant difference in survival among patients who received MTX alone versus MTX plus rituximab (HR = 0.996 (95% CI: 0.398-2.493), p = 0.994). Lower doses of MTX were associated with worse survival outcomes (HR = 0.680 (95% CI: 0.530-0.872), p = 0.002); however, this difference in survival was not significant when adjusted to age (HR = 0.797 (95% CI: 0.584-1.088), p = 0.153). CONCLUSION: Our experience challenges the role of rituximab in PCNSL during induction therapy. Our study also highlights the shorter survival in elderly patients with PCNSL which can be related, to some extent, to the relatively lower doses of HD-MTX. There is an unmet need to establish a consensus on the most effective upfront regimen in PCNSL through prospective studies.
Authors: Markus Joerger; Andrés J M Ferreri; Stephan Krähenbühl; Jan H M Schellens; Thomas Cerny; Emanuele Zucca; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Khê Hoang-Xuan; Eric Bessell; Jacoline Bromberg; Andreas F Hottinger; Matthias Preusser; Roberta Rudà; Uwe Schlegel; Tali Siegal; Carole Soussain; Ufuk Abacioglu; Nathalie Cassoux; Martina Deckert; Clemens M F Dirven; Andrés J M Ferreri; Francesc Graus; Roger Henriksson; Ulrich Herrlinger; Martin Taphoorn; Riccardo Soffietti; Michael Weller Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Quinn T Ostrom; Haley Gittleman; Jordan Xu; Courtney Kromer; Yingli Wolinsky; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Wilhelm Küker; Thomas Nägele; Agnieska Korfel; Stefan Heckl; Eckhard Thiel; Michael Bamberg; Michael Weller; Ulrich Herrlinger Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: M Montesinos-Rongen; A Brunn; S Bentink; K Basso; W K Lim; W Klapper; C Schaller; G Reifenberger; J Rubenstein; O D Wiestler; R Spang; R Dalla-Favera; R Siebert; M Deckert Journal: Leukemia Date: 2007-11-08 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: K Fritsch; B Kasenda; E Schorb; P Hau; J Bloehdorn; R Möhle; S Löw; M Binder; J Atta; U Keller; H-H Wolf; S W Krause; G Heß; R Naumann; S Sasse; C Hirt; M Lamprecht; U Martens; A Morgner; J Panse; N Frickhofen; A Röth; C Hader; M Deckert; H Fricker; G Ihorst; J Finke; G Illerhaus Journal: Leukemia Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: A J M Ferreri; E Guerra; M Regazzi; F Pasini; A Ambrosetti; A Pivnik; A Gubkin; A Calderoni; M Spina; A Brandes; F Ferrarese; A Rognone; S Govi; S Dell'Oro; M Locatelli; E Villa; M Reni Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-01-26 Impact factor: 7.640