Literature DB >> 35441892

Evaluation of the different methods to detect Salmonella in poultry feces samples.

Reza Khaltabadi Farahani1,2, Maryam Meskini3,4, Arash Ghalyanchi Langeroudi5, Safoora Gharibzadeh6, Soumya Ghosh7, Amir Hossien Khaltabadi Farahani8.   

Abstract

Salmonella is one of the most common causes of foodborne outbreaks and infection worldwide. The gold-standard detection method of Salmonella is cultivation. There is a need to investigate rapid and accurate processes with time-consuming cultivation. The study evaluated different approaches to detect Salmonella in poultry feces samples. Poultry farm feces samples from 21 cities in Iran were collected from January 2016 to December 2019. Microbiological cultures, serological assays, and multiplex PCR (m-PCR) were used to detect and characterize Salmonella spp. isolates. Serological assays and m-PCR were used to determine the serogroups A, B, C1, C2, D1, E, H, and FliC. The m-PCR was used to detect seven Salmonella serovars, and a Chi-square test was performed to compare the discriminatory power of the methods. Of 2300 poultry feces samples, 173 (7.5%) and 166 (7.2%) samples were detected as Salmonella spp. by cultivation and m-PCR, respectively. The sensitivity of the molecular method was equal to cultivation at 0.96 (CI = 95%). Assessment of H antigenic subgroups showed the same for both m-PCR and serological tests. Therefore, the matching rate of the two methods for detecting all H antigenic subgroups was 100%. Thus, the relationship between the results obtained from both methods was significant in the contingency table test (P < 0.01). The PCR-based approach confirmed the detection of Salmonella in a shorter period (24-36 h) compared to the conventional microbiological approach (3-8 days).
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Culture; Feces; Multiplex PCR; Poultry; Salmonella

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35441892     DOI: 10.1007/s00203-022-02840-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Microbiol        ISSN: 0302-8933            Impact factor:   2.552


  34 in total

1.  Blind comparison of traditional serotyping with three multiplex PCRs for the identification of Salmonella serotypes.

Authors:  Silvia Herrera-León; Raquel Ramiro; Margarita Arroyo; Rosa Díez; Miguel Angel Usera; Maria Aurora Echeita
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.992

Review 2.  Pullorum disease and fowl typhoid--new thoughts on old diseases: a review.

Authors:  P A Barrow; O C Freitas Neto
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.378

3.  Selective amplification of tyv (rfbE), prt (rfbS), viaB, and fliC genes by multiplex PCR for identification of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A.

Authors:  Kenji Hirose; Ken-Ichiro Itoh; Hiroshi Nakajima; Takayuki Kurazono; Masanori Yamaguchi; Kazuo Moriya; Takayuki Ezaki; Yoshiaki Kawamura; Kazumichi Tamura; Haruo Watanabe
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Serological diagnosis of Salmonella serotype enteritidis infections in poultry by ELISA and other tests.

Authors:  P A Barrow
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.277

5.  Development of PCR primers for the detection of Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis based on the fliC gene.

Authors:  Tsai-Hsin Chiu; Jen-Chieh Pang; Wen-Zhe Hwang; Hau-Yang Tsen
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.077

6.  A comparative study on the pathogenesis of egg contamination by different serotypes of Salmonella.

Authors:  I Gantois; V Eeckhaut; F Pasmans; F Haesebrouck; R Ducatelle; F Van Immerseel
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.378

7.  Genetic basis of multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium isolated from diarrheic calves in Egypt.

Authors:  Ashraf M Ahmed; Emad E A Younis; Yojiro Ishida; Tadashi Shimamoto
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.112

8.  Molecular characterization of motile serovars of Salmonella enterica from breeder and commercial broiler poultry farms in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Himel Barua; Paritosh K Biswas; Katharina E P Olsen; Subrata K Shil; Jens P Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Salmonella Serotyping; Comparison of the Traditional Method to a Microarray-Based Method and an in silico Platform Using Whole Genome Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Benjamin Diep; Caroline Barretto; Anne-Catherine Portmann; Coralie Fournier; Aneta Karczmarek; Guido Voets; Shaoting Li; Xiangyu Deng; Adrianne Klijn
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Diversity and Dynamics of Salmonella enterica in Water Sources, Poultry Litters, and Field Soils Amended With Poultry Litter in a Major Agricultural Area of Virginia.

Authors:  Ganyu Gu; Laura K Strawn; Jie Zheng; Elizabeth A Reed; Steven L Rideout
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.