| Literature DB >> 35440941 |
Yu Zhang1, Xueqiang Sun2, Jingyun Shi1, Zhenjuan Xiao1.
Abstract
This research paper elucidates the clinical effect of an integrated nursing model of medical care and patient in the diagnosis and treatment of congenital esophageal atresia (CEA). For this purpose, a total of 120 children with CEA were selected as study subjects who were admitted to our hospital (January 2017 to April 2020). They were randomly divided into the control group and observation group. Each group had 60 cases. The control group was given routine nursing, while the observation group adopted the integrated nursing model of medical care. The integrated nursing model had the characteristics of recognizing and managing the CEA quickly and efficiently. Thus, it can help increase the survival rate of infants. This model works along with the parents to provide specialized services to the child. They were tasked to carefully observe the infants as well as calm the parents. They were also given the additional task of keeping track of patients who were currently admitted in the hospital and those who were already discharged. The tracking and communication were done with the help of a communication platform which is WeChat. The rehospitalization rate, 1-hour visit rate, accuracy rate of children with suspected postoperative complications, psychological status of children's parents, medical compliance, and satisfaction were compared between the two groups. The rehospitalization rate in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The 1-hour visit rate and accuracy of children with suspected postoperative complications in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The anxiety and depression scores of the parents in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The compliance and satisfaction of parents in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The clinical effect of the integrated nursing model of medical care and patient in CEA was highly satisfactory. It reduces the rehospitalization rate and enables timely diagnosis and treatment of suspicious complications effectively. It also improved parents' negative psychological emotions, compliance, and satisfaction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35440941 PMCID: PMC9013569 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4147217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Attention-LSTM model.
Figure 2NFM model.
Comparison of general information of children in two groups.
| Project | Control group ( | Observation group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) (example) | 38/22 | 41/19 | 0.333 | 0.564 |
| Gestational age at birth (W, | 38.4 ± 5.68 | 38.9 ± 4.63 | −0.515 | 0.608 |
| Birth weight (kg, | 2.72 ± 0.24 | 2.84 ± 0.53 | −1.898 | 0.113 |
| 1-minute Apgar score (points, | 9 ± 0.35 | 9 ± 0.28 | <0.001 | 1.000 |
| Father's age (years, | 27.73 ± 5.27 | 26.82 ± 4.5 | 0.867 | 0.358 |
| Mother's age (years, | 25.23 ± 6.25 | 24.18 ± 6.74 | 1.006 | 0.675 |
| Education level (example) | ||||
| College degree or above | 37 | 42 | ||
| High school | 18 | 14 | ||
| Junior middle school | 5 | 4 |
Comparison of the abnormalities found in the two groups of children after surgery.
| Group | Number of cases | Number of revisits | Rehospitalization rate (person (%)) | 1-hour visit rate of children with suspected postoperative complications (person (%)) | Accuracy rate of children with suspected postoperative complications (person (%)) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 60 | 18 | 17 (28.33) | 15 (88.33) | 16 (88.89) |
| Control group | 60 | 39 | 28(46.67) | 9(23.07) | 25(64.10) |
|
| 4.302 | - | - | ||
|
| 0.038 | <0.001 | 0.048 |
Comparison of SAS and SDS scores before and after intervention for parents of children in both groups (scores, ).
| Group | Number of cases | SAS score | SDS score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
| Observation group | 60 | 65.41 ± 4.26 | 40.15 ± 3.14 | 61.31 ± 4.17 | 41.73 ± 2.57 |
| Control group | 60 | 64.37 ± 3.85 | 58.27 ± 3.18 | 60.89 ± 4.59 | 54.41 ± 3.72 |
| t value | 1.403 | −31.407 | 0.525 | −21.723 | |
|
| 0.163 | <0.001 | 0.601 | <0.001 | |
Comparison of compliance (%).
| Group | Number of cases | Noncompliance | Partial compliance | Complete compliance | Compliance rate |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 60 | 1 (1.67) | 2 (3.33) | 57 (95.00) | 59 (98.330) | 4.821 | 0.028 |
| Control group | 60 | 7 (6.67) | 6 (10.00) | 47 (78.33) | 53 (88.33) |
Percentage increase in hospital admissions (95% CI) for three systemic disease categories per 10 μg increase in each pollutant concentration (0.1 mg increase in CO).
| Contaminants | Respiratory hospitalization | Circulatory system hospitalization | Digestive system hospitalization |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.3 (0.04, 0.57) | 0.24 (−0.1, 0.59) | 0.03 (−0.3, 0.36) |
|
| 0.21 (0.04, 0.39) | 0.21 (−0.01, 0.43) | 0.04 (−0.16, 0.25) |
|
| 2.43 (0.63, 4.26) | 2.84 (0.58, 5.16) | 0.46 (−1.62, 2.58) |
|
| 1.17 (0.57, 1.77) | 1.4 (0.65, 2.16) | 0.67 (−0.03, 1.38) |
| CO | 0.47 (0.16, 0.78) | 0.6 (0.21, 0.99) | 0.27 (−0.1, 0.64) |
|
| 0.16 (0.55, 0.22) | −0.18 (−0.64, 0.28) | −0.12 (−0.54, 0.31) |
p < 0.05, statistically significant; all pollutant concentrations are same-day concentrations (lag0).
Figure 3Percentage increase in hospital admissions for respiratory diseases per 10 μg increase in each pollutant concentration (95% CI, red means statistically significant).
Figure 4Percentage increase in hospital admissions for circulatory disease per 10 μg increase in each pollutant concentration (95% CI, red represents statistical significance).
Figure 5Percentage increase in hospital admissions.