Literature DB >> 35440166

Physiologic Insights Into Long COVID Breathlessness.

David M Kaye1,2,3, Donna Vizi1, Sandra Graham1, Bing Wang2,3, Waled Shihata1, Shane Nanayakkara1,2,3, Justin Mariani1,2,3, Manuja Premaratne4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  dyspnea; embolism; fibrosis; hemodynamics; pathology

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35440166      PMCID: PMC9202960          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.009346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   10.447


× No keyword cloud information.
Breathlessness is among the most prevalent features of long COVID.[1] While post-COVID lung pathology, such as pulmonary fibrosis, has been reported in some patients, this is not universal. In the absence of direct pulmonary pathology, there has been speculation on the potential contribution of other cardiopulmonary mechanisms, including pulmonary embolism/chronic thromboembolic pulmonary vascular disease, myocardial fibrosis, and microvascular dysfunction. To date, the potential contribution of these latter mechanisms to exertional breathlessness remains controversial and several have not yet been examined in detail using relevant methodologies. In the present study, we aimed to characterize the hemodynamic and metabolic profile patients with long COVID breathlessness at rest and during exertion. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. We performed simultaneous echocardiography, right heart catheterization, invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring and blood gas monitoring at rest and during symptom limited exertion in 12 consecutive patients with post-COVID breathlessness, in which a pulmonary cause had been excluded by their managing physician; data were compared with that from 12 age-matched healthy volunteers from prior studies. The study was approved by the Alfred Hospital Research and Ethics Committee, and all participants provided written informed consent. Data are reported as mean±SD. Between group comparisons were performed using an unpaired t test. Patients with COVID were aged 50±6 versus 52±2 years in controls (P=ns) and tended to be heavier, albeit not significantly (body mass index: 31±3 versus 26±1 kg/m2; P=ns). Of the patients with COVID, 4 required hospital admission and 2 required intensive care admission. All patients with COVID had significant functional limitation (7 New York Heart Association III and 5 New York Heart Association II). The left ventricular ejection fraction at rest was lower in patients with COVID (66±5% versus 70±4%; P=0.03) and the left ventricular end diastolic index was smaller (23±2 versus 25±3 mm/m2; P=0.03). As shown in the Table, patients with COVID exhibited normal resting hemodynamics. Patients with COVID had a significantly lower peak work capacity compared with controls, and the peak exercise cardiac index was lower in patients with COVID. The arterial O2 saturation, arterial Pco2 and mixed venous O2 saturation were similar in COVID and control patients at rest and during exercise. Notably the resting arterial lactate concentration was higher in patients with COVID at rest but given the lower peak workload level rose to a lesser extent during exercise. Rest and Exercise Hemodynamic and Metabolic Features Our data demonstrate that patients with persistent symptoms of dyspnea post-COVID without significant lung pathology, have normal pulmonary arterial pressures, filling pressures and pulmonary vascular resistance both at rest and during exertion, and show no evidence of oxygen desaturation or accumulation of carbon dioxide. Although we did not conduct a radiological assessment for chronic pulmonary thromboembolic disease in all patients, these data would tend to preclude such a diagnosis. In this cohort of long COVID patients, we, therefore, cannot ascribe a cardiopulmonary cause to the sensation of breathlessness. Although our study is of a relatively small size, we conducted a detailed invasive hemodynamic and echocardiographic assessment at rest and during exercise. An extensive body of literature has already accumulated to suggest involvement of the cardiovascular system in COVID illness. Early reports identified the frequent occurrence of increased levels of cardiac injury biomarkers particularly in patients with severe COVID illness,[2] potentially due to acute plaque rupture, microvascular damage, or myocarditis. The demonstration of COVID mediated acute myocardial injury has also been proposed to contribute to myocardial fibrosis observed in some patients following COVID illness.[3] Patients with acute respiratory distress syndromes not due to COVID have also been shown to have comparable increases in troponin suggesting elevation of cardiac biomarkers is not specific to COVID per se. In this study, we do not have data about cardiac function or troponin profiles during the acute COVID illness. Critical illness is frequently followed by a protracted recovery phase, due to acquired respiratory and peripheral muscle weakness, impaired cognition and posttraumatic stress. Consistent with observations in chronic fatigue patients,[4] we found a modestly elevated resting blood lactate level in long COVID patients, although exercise was not associated with excess lactate accumulation or limiting oxygen extraction. Alterations in autonomic function may also occur postviral and postcritical illness, manifest by an impairment in volume recruitment during physical activity. Indeed, aspects of our study are consistent with this physiology, as also observed recently.[5] Cardiopulmonary exercise test evaluation was not performed in the current study; recent data have demonstrated markedly reduced peak VO2 in long COVID patients.[5] Taken together, our data are more consistent with long COVID dyspnea being the result of a generalized postcritical illness process rather than a primary cardiovascular cause. Although the current study suggests that post-COVID breathlessness is likely not due to central cardiovascular or pulmonary vascular complications, there does remain an important role for comprehensive cardiopulmonary evaluation in patients with unexplained breathlessness, including long COVID. Such an assessment should include cardiopulmonary exercise testing and invasive exercise hemodynamic studies.

Article Information

Sources of Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the National Heart Foundation of Australia to Dr Kaye.

Disclosures

None.
Table.

Rest and Exercise Hemodynamic and Metabolic Features

  5 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19 for the Cardiologist: A Current Review of the Virology, Clinical Epidemiology, Cardiac and Other Clinical Manifestations and Potential Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Deepak Atri; Hasan K Siddiqi; Joshua Lang; Victor Nauffal; David A Morrow; Erin A Bohula
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2020-04-10

2.  Elevated blood lactate in resting conditions correlate with post-exertional malaise severity in patients with Myalgic encephalomyelitis/Chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  Alaa Ghali; Carole Lacout; Maria Ghali; Aline Gury; Anne-Berengere Beucher; Pierre Lozac'h; Christian Lavigne; Geoffrey Urbanski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Description and Proposed Management of the Acute COVID-19 Cardiovascular Syndrome.

Authors:  Nicholas S Hendren; Mark H Drazner; Biykem Bozkurt; Leslie T Cooper
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19: Insights From Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.

Authors:  Inderjit Singh; Phillip Joseph; Paul M Heerdt; Marjorie Cullinan; Denyse D Lutchmansingh; Mridu Gulati; Jennifer D Possick; David M Systrom; Aaron B Waxman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Outcomes of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Valentina O Puntmann; M Ludovica Carerj; Imke Wieters; Masia Fahim; Christophe Arendt; Jedrzej Hoffmann; Anastasia Shchendrygina; Felicitas Escher; Mariuca Vasa-Nicotera; Andreas M Zeiher; Maria Vehreschild; Eike Nagel
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 14.676

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.