Literature DB >> 35439440

Prospective Multisite Cohort Study to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making Utilization Among Individuals Screened for Lung Cancer.

Tina D Tailor1, M Patricia Rivera2, Danielle D Durham3, Pasangi Perera3, Lindsay Lane3, Louise M Henderson4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, components of, and factors associated with shared decision-making (SDM) discussions according to electronic health record (EHR) documentation among individuals undergoing lung cancer screening (LCS).
METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted of individuals undergoing LCS between February 2015 and June 2020 at four LCS centers. The primary outcome was EHR-documented SDM, defined using Medicare-designated components. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine predictors of EHR-documented SDM. A secondary outcome was agreement of individual's self-report of SDM and EHR-documented SDM, evaluated using Cohen's κ statistic.
RESULTS: Among screened individuals, 41.9% (243 of 580) had EHR-documented SDM, and 71.1% (295 of 415) had self-reported SDM. Decision aids were used in 55.6% of EHR-documented SDM encounters (135 of 243), and 21.8% of documented SDM encounters (53 of 243) included all Medicare-designated components. SDM was documented more frequently in individuals with body mass index ≥ 25 versus <25 kg/m2 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.52) and in currently versus formerly smoking individuals (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02-2.32). Nonpulmonary referring clinicians were less likely to document SDM than pulmonary clinicians (internal medicine: aOR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.53; family medicine: aOR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.04-0.14; other specialties: aOR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.21). In a subset of 415 individuals, there was little agreement between individual self-report of SDM and EHR-documented SDM (κ = 0.184), with variation in agreement on the basis of referring clinician specialty.
CONCLUSIONS: Although EHR-documented SDM occurred in fewer than half of individuals undergoing LCS, self-reported SDM rates were higher, suggesting that SDM may be underdocumented in the EHR. In addition, EHR-documented SDM was more likely in individuals with higher body mass index and those referred for LCS by pulmonary clinicians. These findings indicate areas for improvement in the implementation and documentation of SDM.
Copyright © 2022 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shared decision-making; early detection of cancer; lung neoplasms; mass screening

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35439440      PMCID: PMC9357041          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   6.240


  22 in total

1.  Coverage of clinical preventive services under the Affordable Care Act: from law to access.

Authors:  Naomi Seiler; Mary-Beth Malcarney; Katie Horton; Scott Dafflitto
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Tools to Promote Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose CT Scanning: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mayuko Ito Fukunaga; Kyle Halligan; Jennifer Kodela; Shaun Toomey; Vanessa Fiorini Furtado; Roger Luckmann; Paul K J Han; Kathleen M Mazor; Sonal Singh
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Requirement for Shared Decision-making for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Daniel S Reuland; Robert J Volk
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  ACR-STR practice parameter for the performance and reporting of lung cancer screening thoracic computed tomography (CT): 2014 (Resolution 4).

Authors:  Ella A Kazerooni; John H M Austin; William C Black; Debra S Dyer; Todd R Hazelton; Ann N Leung; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Reginald F Munden; Sudhakar Pipavath
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Shared decision-making conversations and smoking cessation interventions: critical components of low-dose CT lung cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Lisa M Lowenstein; Gary M R Deyter; Shawn Nishi; Tianhao Wang; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06

7.  Assessment of Lung Cancer Screening Program Websites.

Authors:  Stephen D Clark; Daniel S Reuland; Chineme Enyioha; Daniel E Jonas
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  The Radiologist as Direct Public Educator: Impact of Sessions Demystifying Select Cancer Screening Imaging Examinations.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Derek Mason; Nathan M Kunzler; Jiyon Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; Karina W Davidson; Carol M Mangione; Michael J Barry; Michael Cabana; Aaron B Caughey; Esa M Davis; Katrina E Donahue; Chyke A Doubeni; Martha Kubik; C Seth Landefeld; Li Li; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Douglas K Owens; Lori Pbert; Michael Silverstein; James Stevermer; Chien-Wen Tseng; John B Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening: How Well Are We "Sharing"?

Authors:  Shawn P E Nishi; Lisa M Lowenstein; Tito R Mendoza; Maria A Lopez Olivo; Laura C Crocker; Karen Sepucha; Jiangong Niu; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 10.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.