| Literature DB >> 35438201 |
Rajarshi Mazumder1, David Kitara Lagoro2, Hiroki Nariai3, Alberto Danieli4, Dawn Eliashiv1, Jerome Engel1, Bernardo Dalla Bernardina5,6, Josua Kegele7, Holger Lerche7, James Sejvar8, William Matuja9, Erich Schmutzhard10, Paolo Bonanni4, Gianni De Polo11, Thomas Wagner12, Andrea Sylvia Winkler13,14.
Abstract
Nodding syndrome (NS) is a poorly understood form of childhood-onset epilepsy that is characterized by the pathognomonic ictal phenomenon of repetitive vertical head drops. To evaluate the underlying ictal neurophysiology, ictal EEG features were evaluated in nine participants with confirmed NS from South Sudan, Tanzania, and Uganda and ictal presence of high frequency gamma oscillations on scalp EEG were assessed. Ictal EEG during the head nodding episode predominantly showed generalized slow waves or sharp-and-slow wave complexes followed by electrodecrement. Augmentation of gamma activity (30-70 Hz) was seen during the head nodding episode in all the participants. We confirm that head nodding episodes in persons with NS from the three geographically distinct regions in sub-Saharan Africa share the common features of slow waves with electrodecrement and superimposed gamma activity. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:75-80.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35438201 PMCID: PMC9544008 DOI: 10.1002/ana.26377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Neurol ISSN: 0364-5134 Impact factor: 11.274
FIGURE 1(A and B) A 7 year‐old male with NS (participant s3) onset at age 6 years. (A) Ictal EEG shows generalized slow wave followed by electrodecrement. EEG background between each head nod is marked by generalized spike and wave discharges. (B) Interictal EEG shows 2‐ 3 Hz generalized spike and wave discharges. Both EEGs are shown in bipolar montage. Low frequency filter: 0.053 Hz, high frequency filter: 70 Hz Black arrows indicate head drops. C and D: Time frequency analysis of ictal head nod showed augmentation of gamma activity on scalp EEG of children with NS from South Sudan and Tanzania. (C) In an 18 year‐old male with NS (participant s8) from South Sudan, time‐frequency plot derived from 70 head nodding episodes showed maximal augmentation of gamma (30 Hz‐70 Hz) at the centro‐parietal electrodes during the head drops. (D) In a 12 year‐old male (participant s4) from Tanzania, time‐frequency plot derived from 17 head nodding episodes showing augmentation of gamma‐activity. Blue color indicates attenuation of amplitude and red color indicates augmentation of amplitude in the corresponding time‐frequency bin relative to the baseline.
FIGURE 2Time frequency analysis of ictal head nod showed augmentation of gamma activity on scalp EEG of a 17 year‐old male (participant s1) with NS from Uganda. EEG sampling frequency 256 Hz. (A) Tracing with average EEG montage. Low frequency filter (LFF): 1 Hz, High frequency filter (HFF): 70 Hz; (B) Temporally expanded trace of EEG shown in panel A LFF: 0.1 Hz, HFF: Off. The Trigger point marked by blue arrow was visually set at the deflection point of the largest negative peak of slow wave during head nodding episode. (C) EEG filtered with LFF 30 Hz and HFF off. (D) Time‐frequency plot derived from 100 head nodding episodes. There is maximal augmentation of gamma (30 Hz‐70 Hz) at the centro‐parietal electrodes during the head drops. Blue color indicates attenuation of amplitude and red color indicates augmentation of amplitude in the corresponding time‐frequency bin relative to the baseline.
Time‐Frequency Analysis of Ictal Head Nodding
| ID | Peak Gamma Channel | Gamma Maximum Amplitude Change (%) | Onset Latency of Gamma (ms) | Peak Latency Gamma (ms) | Peak Delta Channel | Delta Maxima‐Amplitude Change (%) | Peak Latency of Delta (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | Pz | 47.9 | −310 | −220 | Pz | 126 | 0 |
| s2 | P3 | 74.5 | −610 | −210 | F4 | 400 | 0 |
| s3 | Pz | 169 |
|
| C3 | 176 |
|
| s4 | O1 | 98.7 |
|
| C3 | 253 |
|
| s5 | O1 | 177 | 10 | 270 | P4 | 567 | 1,000 |
| s6 | O2 | 161 |
|
| O1 | 110 |
|
| s7 | C4 | 189 |
|
| P3 | 435 |
|
| s8 | P4 | 63.7 | −140 | 240 | Fz | 150 | 100 |
| s9 | P3 | 45 | −30 | 130 | P4 | 525 | 100 |
For subjects s3, s4, s6, s7, gamma augmentation did not reach statistical significance and onset latency could not be calculated.