Marietou Niang1, Mahaman Moha2, Valéry Ridde3, Lara Gautier4,5. 1. Faculté des sciences infirmières, Santé communautaire, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada. 2. Laboratoire d'Études et de Recherches sur les Dynamiques Sociales et le Développement Local, Niamey, Niger. 3. Centre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) et Université Paris Cité, Inserm ERL 1244, Paris, France. 4. École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal (ESPUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada. lara.gautier@umontreal.ca. 5. Centre de recherche en santé publique, Université de Montréal et CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. lara.gautier@umontreal.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article is a case study of a capacity-building project to reduce malnutrition, implemented by a non-governmental organization (NGO) in Niger. It aims to generate a set of lessons learned on the processes of sustaining health interventions in vulnerable contexts. METHODS: Using a theoretical framework on sustainability, we carried out a thematic analysis on semi-structured individual interviews (n = 124) collected, between 2016 and 2017, during the evaluative research of the NGO project. RESULTS: The data analysis revealed several risks and opportunities to sustain the project activities, classified according to the characteristics of a routine identified in the theoretical framework: memory, routines, values, and rules. Our findings show a low level of sustainability of the project. Several activities were stopped at the end of the project and others may not continue in the long term. Indeed, local realities-poverty and political fragility-combined with the 'short-term' and vertical logics of the project's implementation have hindered the project activities' sustainability. CONCLUSION: In vulnerable environments, sustainability should not simply be seen as an outcome to be achieved at the end of the project. The sustainability process must be activated by key stakeholders, focusing not only on the resources stabilizing but also on the resilience of the structures and systems in which interventions are embedded.
OBJECTIVE: This article is a case study of a capacity-building project to reduce malnutrition, implemented by a non-governmental organization (NGO) in Niger. It aims to generate a set of lessons learned on the processes of sustaining health interventions in vulnerable contexts. METHODS: Using a theoretical framework on sustainability, we carried out a thematic analysis on semi-structured individual interviews (n = 124) collected, between 2016 and 2017, during the evaluative research of the NGO project. RESULTS: The data analysis revealed several risks and opportunities to sustain the project activities, classified according to the characteristics of a routine identified in the theoretical framework: memory, routines, values, and rules. Our findings show a low level of sustainability of the project. Several activities were stopped at the end of the project and others may not continue in the long term. Indeed, local realities-poverty and political fragility-combined with the 'short-term' and vertical logics of the project's implementation have hindered the project activities' sustainability. CONCLUSION: In vulnerable environments, sustainability should not simply be seen as an outcome to be achieved at the end of the project. The sustainability process must be activated by key stakeholders, focusing not only on the resources stabilizing but also on the resilience of the structures and systems in which interventions are embedded.
Authors: Sarah L Dalglish; Pamela J Surkan; Aïssa Diarra; Abdoutan Harouna; Sara Bennett Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Jean-Pierre Olivier de Sardan; Aïssa Diarra; Félix Yaouaga Koné; Maurice Yaogo; Roger Zerbo Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Edward N Okeke; Emma Pitchforth; Josephine Exley; Peter Glick; Isa Sadeeq Abubakar; Amalavoyal V Chari; Usman Bashir; Kun Gu; Obinna Onwujekwe Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Franck G B Alé; Kevin P Q Phelan; Hassan Issa; Isabelle Defourny; Guillaume Le Duc; Geza Harczi; Kader Issaley; Sani Sayadi; Nassirou Ousmane; Issoufou Yahaya; Mark Myatt; André Briend; Thierry Allafort-Duverger; Susan Shepherd; Nikki Blackwell Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2016-09-06