Andrew Petraszko1, Kaushik Chagarlamudi2, Nikhil Ramaiya1. 1. Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. Kaushik.chagarlamudi@uhhospitals.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The radiology report is the primary work product of the diagnostic radiologist. Its quality is a direct reflection of his or her knowledge, experience, and confidence. Certain factors hindering one's ability to deliver a diagnostically accurate and concise report are sometimes unavoidable (e.g., study limitations and insufficient history); however, radiologists who routinely produce deficient reports not only erode their credibility and reputation amongst colleagues, they magnify their risk of litigation. METHODS: This article is directed toward radiology residents to help facilitate the adoption of effective reporting habits. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Up to 92% of referring physicians and 95% of radiologists agree that learning to report should be an "obligatory and well-structured" component of radiology residency education as discussed by Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, and Parizel PM. Unfortunately, this remains the exception rather than the rule. This article is written with the following objectives: (1) to identify strategies that improve the value of radiology reporting, (2) to define the features of a high-quality radiology report, (3) to instill trust and respect from referring clinicians through clear, accurate, and effective communication, and (4) to understand and avoid potential medicolegal ramifications of deficient radiology reports.
PURPOSE: The radiology report is the primary work product of the diagnostic radiologist. Its quality is a direct reflection of his or her knowledge, experience, and confidence. Certain factors hindering one's ability to deliver a diagnostically accurate and concise report are sometimes unavoidable (e.g., study limitations and insufficient history); however, radiologists who routinely produce deficient reports not only erode their credibility and reputation amongst colleagues, they magnify their risk of litigation. METHODS: This article is directed toward radiology residents to help facilitate the adoption of effective reporting habits. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Up to 92% of referring physicians and 95% of radiologists agree that learning to report should be an "obligatory and well-structured" component of radiology residency education as discussed by Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, and Parizel PM. Unfortunately, this remains the exception rather than the rule. This article is written with the following objectives: (1) to identify strategies that improve the value of radiology reporting, (2) to define the features of a high-quality radiology report, (3) to instill trust and respect from referring clinicians through clear, accurate, and effective communication, and (4) to understand and avoid potential medicolegal ramifications of deficient radiology reports.