Literature DB >> 35437617

Community Mobilization Approaches for Large-Scale Public Health Surveys: Experiences from the Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (PHIA) Project.

Bright Phiri1, Apala Guhathakurta2, Connor Wright2, Blanche Pitt3, Reaboka Maraisane4, Leonard Kingwara5, Aroldia Mulokozi6, Nellie Wadonda7, Catherine Ngugi8, Danielle Payne7.   

Abstract

Community mobilization is an integral process of raising awareness and increasing participation in a specific program. Communities with long-standing mistrust of health research may otherwise be reluctant to participate in surveys originating outside of their locality, particularly when asked to share personal information, provide blood samples, or undergo medical examinations. Here we discuss the community mobilization approaches undertaken by the Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (PHIA) project to optimize participation in surveys across 13 countries of sub-Saharan Africa. The PHIA Project developed a community mobilization strategy to address anticipated community concerns. In each country, a trained cadre of Community Mobilization Coordinators (CMCs) facilitated (1) ongoing communication with leadership and stakeholders at national, provincial/district and local levels; (2) door-to-door visits and group meetings; (3) promotional material dissemination through radio and television jingles and mass social/community media; and (4) the use of public address systems to enhance survey awareness and promote participation. Response rates (RR) were recorded from each survey. The PHIA surveys' mobilization efforts cultivated a receptive environment for data collection. The average household response rate for 13 PHIA surveys was 90.4% and interview RR were consistently over 80%, with women more likely to conduct an interview in all countries except Cote d'Ivoire. 89% of eligible women consented to a blood draw and 81.1% of eligible men consented. The robust and contextualized community mobilization approaches in PHIA were critical for engaging communities in large-scale public health surveys and contributed to high RR in participant interviews and blood draw.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community mobilization; HIV/AIDS; PHIA; Population-based surveys

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35437617     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-022-01088-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  6 in total

Review 1.  Implementing Community Engagement for Combination Prevention: Lessons Learnt From the First Year of the HPTN 071 (PopART) Community-Randomized Study.

Authors:  Musonda Simwinga; Virginia Bond; Nozizwe Makola; Graeme Hoddinott; Steve Belemu; Rhonda White; Kwame Shanaube; Janet Seeley; Ayana Moore
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.071

2.  No "magic bullet": exploring community mobilization strategies used in a multi-site community based randomized controlled trial: Project Accept (HPTN 043).

Authors:  Virginia A Tedrow; Carla E Zelaya; Caitlin E Kennedy; Stephen F Morin; Gertrude Khumalo-Sakutukwa; Michael D Sweat; David D Celentano
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2012-07

3.  Community perception and beliefs about blood draw for clinical research in Ghana.

Authors:  Owusu Boahen; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Lawrence Gyabaa Febir; Charlotte Tawiah; Theresa Tawiah; Samuel Afari; Samuel Newton
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.184

4.  Evaluating community engagement in global health research: the need for metrics.

Authors:  Kathleen M MacQueen; Anant Bhan; Janet Frohlich; Jessica Holzer; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Community mobilization, empowerment and HIV prevention among female sex workers in south India.

Authors:  Andrea K Blanchard; Haranahalli Lakkappa Mohan; Maryam Shahmanesh; Ravi Prakash; Shajy Isac; Banadakoppa Manjappa Ramesh; Parinita Bhattacharjee; Vandana Gurnani; Stephen Moses; James F Blanchard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Grand challenges in global health: community engagement in research in developing countries.

Authors:  Paulina O Tindana; Jerome A Singh; C Shawn Tracy; Ross E G Upshur; Abdallah S Daar; Peter A Singer; Janet Frohlich; James V Lavery
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.069

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.