| Literature DB >> 35437509 |
Yu Song1, Xi Han2, Gaoyi Li3, Wusong Tong4, Mingxia Fan5, Xianzhen Chen1, Jia Yin1, Songyu Chen1, Jingrong Huang6, Dongming Gao1, Liang Gao1, Yan Dong1,7.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the interhemispheric functional coordination following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its association with posttraumatic anxiety and depressive symptoms.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35437509 PMCID: PMC9012975 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3408660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the enrollment.
| Overall | TBI | HC |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| Gender (%) | 0.946 | |||
| Male | 34 (65.4) | 19 (63.3) | 15 (68.2) | |
| Female | 18 (34.6) | 11 (36.7) | 7 (31.8) | |
| Age (median [IQR]) | 32.50 [25.75, 45.00] | 34.50 [26.00, 45.75] | 31.50 [25.00, 41.75] | 0.565 |
| Education (median [IQR]) | 9.00 [7.50, 12.00] | 9.00 [6.00, 12.00] | 9.00 [9.00, 11.25] | 0.795 |
| Time since injury (median [IQR]) | 6 [4.00, 11.00] | — | ||
| Cause of injury (%) | ||||
| Traffic accident | 19 (63.33) | — | ||
| Fall | 7 (23.33) | — | ||
| Struck by/against | 4 (13.33) | — | ||
| GCS on admission (%) | ||||
| 13-15 | 20 (66.67) | — | ||
| 9-12 | 5 (16.67) | — | ||
| 3-8 | 5 (16.67) | — | ||
| Loss of consciousness (%) | ||||
| Yes | 19 (63.33) | — | ||
| No | 9 (30.00) | — | ||
| Unknown | 2 (6.67) | — | ||
| Intracerebral lesion on MRI scan (%) | ||||
| Yes | 23 (76.67) | — | ||
| No | 7 (23.33) | — | ||
| GOS-E (median [IQR]) | 6.50 [5.00,7.00] | — | ||
| Anxiety (median [IQR]) | 6.00 [3.75, 8.25] | 7.00 [5.00, 12.00] | 4.00 [3.00, 6.00] |
|
| Depression (median [IQR]) | 4.50 [2.00, 7.25] | 6.50 [3.25, 10.00] | 2.50 [1.00, 4.75] |
|
TBI: traumatic brain injury; HC: healthy control; IQR: interquartile range; GCS: Glasgow coma scale; and GOS-E: Glasgow outcome scale-extended.
Regions showing significant differences in VMHC between traumatic brain injury patients and healthy controls.
| Regions | MNI coordinates | Number of voxels | Peak intensity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| TBI < HC | |||||
| MFG | ±33 | 57 | -3 | 40 | -5.8005 |
| MTG | ±39 | 18 | -33 | 32 | -4.317 |
VMHC: voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity; TBI: traumatic brain injury; MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute; HC: healthy control; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; and MTG: middle temporal gyrus.
Figure 1Regional variation of VMHC between TBI patients and the healthy controls. Relative to healthy controls, the TBI patients had significantly decreased VMHC values (blue) in 4 clusters, including the middle temporal gyrus and orbital middle frontal gyrus on both sides.
Partial correlation between clinical assessment and VMHC∗.
| Regions | HADS-A | HADS-D | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rho |
| Rho |
| |
| TBI group( | ||||
| MFG | 0.471 |
| 0.587 |
|
| MTG | 0.064 | 0.757 | 0.208 | 0.308 |
| HC group( | ||||
| MFG | 0.151 | 0.55 | 0.555 |
|
| MTG | 0.372 | 0.129 | 0.283 | 0.256 |
VMHC: voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity; TBI: traumatic brain injury; HC: healthy control; HADS-A: hospital anxiety and depression scale anxiety; HADS-D: hospital anxiety and depression scale depression; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; MTG: middle temporal gyrus. ∗Adjusted for age, gender, education (years), and total intracranial volume.
Figure 2Partial correlation analyses in the TBI group and healthy controls. A and B showed the partial correlations between the VMHC value of the orbital middle frontal gyrus and HADS anxiety and depression scores, respectively. MFG: middle frontal gyrus.
Figure 3The diagnostic value of the decreased VMHC in distinguishing the TBI patients from the healthy controls. AUC: area under the curve.
The difference of grey matter volume between traumatic brain injury patients and healthy controls.
| Regions | Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis∗ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBI ( | HC ( |
|
|
| |
| MFG-L | 17.02 [14.65, 18.28] | 18.07 [16.02, 20.29] | 0.067 | 0.904 | 0.123 |
| MFG-R | 16.77 [15.28, 18.84] | 18.52 [16.65, 20.80] |
| 0.982 | 0.114 |
| MTG-L | 12.35 [11.60, 13.74] | 13.49 [12.73, 15.30] |
| 1.028 |
|
| MTG-R | 13.26 [11.99, 14.91] | 14.50 [12.92, 15.76] | 0.054 | 0.371 | 0.282 |
TBI: traumatic brain injury; HC: healthy control; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; MTG: middle temporal gyrus. ∗Dependent variable: grey matter volume; Independent variable: group. Adjusted for age, gender, education (years), and total intracranial volume.
Comparison of fractional anisotropy values in different regions of the corpus callosum between traumatic brain injury patients and healthy controls.
| Region | Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis∗ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBI ( | HC ( |
|
|
| |
| Genu | 0.52 [0.51, 0.53] | 0.55 [0.53, 0.57] |
| 0.038 |
|
| Body | 0.58 [0.55, 0.59] | 0.60 [0.58, 0.63] |
| 0.034 |
|
| Splenium | 0.68 [0.66, 0.69] | 0.70 [0.69, 0.71] |
| 0.021 |
|
TBI: traumatic brain injury; HC: healthy control. ∗Dependent variable: FA value; Independent variable: group. Adjusted for age, gender, education (years), and total intracranial volume.
Figure 4Comparisons on FA values in each subregion of the corpus callosum between TBI and HC. (a) Three parts of the corpus callosum. (b) Univariable analysis of the three subregions between the two groups.