Literature DB >> 35437498

Basilar Invagination: Surgical Treatment by Novel Anterior Implant.

Sushil V Patkar1, Pradnya Patkar2.   

Abstract

Introduction: Anterior retropharyngeal realignment, distraction, and atlantoaxial fixation are an option for the treatment of symptomatic basilar invagination (BI). The anterior implants for distraction and fixation for atlantoaxial joints are still evolving. We share our experience using a novel implant which can easily, safely, and rigidly fix both lateral masses to the body of the axis.
Methods: After exposing both the atlantoaxial joints anteriorly, the joints were prepared, distracted with wedge shaped autologous tricorticate bone grafts and realigned to correct the cervicomedullary strain. The atlantoaxial joints were fixed using a novel titanium plate by passing screws upwards and laterally into the lateral masses of the atlas and centrally into the body of the axis. Post-operative imaging showed effective correction of BI and atlantoaxial dislocation. Post-operative dynamic X-ray images confirmed maintenance of rigid fixation at 6 months.
Conclusion: This new plate screw construct is safe, easy, cost-efficient, and biomechanically appealing option for the treatment of symptomatic BI. Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basilar invagination; atlantoaxial dislocation; atlantoaxial fixation; atlantoaxial instability; vertebral artery injury

Year:  2021        PMID: 35437498      PMCID: PMC9009472          DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i06.2248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep        ISSN: 2250-0685


Anterior extrapharyngeal distraction and fixation of atlas and axis with the new implant is a simple , safe and biomechanically appealing technique.

Introduction

Realignment of atlantoaxial facets along with distraction using bone grafts and cages followed by fixation is a standard surgical option for symptomatic basilar invagination (BI). We present the case of a 45-year-old male patient who presented with quadriparesis following a trivial fall. He underwent anterior surgery for distraction, bone grafting, and realignment of facets followed by fixation using a novel customized implant. Post-operative imaging showed satisfactory outcome and stable fixation at 6 months. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated BI with atlantoaxial dislocation and pinching of the cervicomedullary junction of the neuroaxis with signal change within the medulla and upper cord. Computerized axial tomography (CT) with dynamic study confirmed significant BI with atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). The atlas was occipitalized with the enlarged lateral masses overhanging and tilting over the anterior edge of the malformed superior facets of the axis resulting in posterior opening of the atlantoaxial joints and resultant AAD with BI. The Grabb-Oakes index was 11.7 mm. The posterior lip of the occiput with the fused atlas was hypertrophied and impinged into the foramen magnum. The spinous process and laminae of the axis were hypertrophied. CT angiography showed a hypo plastic left vertebral artery and large right vertebral with an abnormal course dorsally over the pars of the axis. Lateral X-ray of the craniovertebral junction in extension showed the angle of the mandible at the level of the C2-3 disc (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

(a) Mid-sagittal MRI shows basilar invagination (BI) with 360° compression at craniovertebral junction with cord signal anomalies. (b) Mid-sagittal CT shows severe BI, occipitalized atlas, atlantoaxial dislocation, and hypertrophied axis spinous process. (c and d) Malaligned facet showing anterior slip of atlas over axis. (e) 3D CT angiogram, single anomalous coursing right vertebral artery. (f) X-ray in extension shows angle of mandible at C2-3 disc.

(a) Mid-sagittal MRI shows basilar invagination (BI) with 360° compression at craniovertebral junction with cord signal anomalies. (b) Mid-sagittal CT shows severe BI, occipitalized atlas, atlantoaxial dislocation, and hypertrophied axis spinous process. (c and d) Malaligned facet showing anterior slip of atlas over axis. (e) 3D CT angiogram, single anomalous coursing right vertebral artery. (f) X-ray in extension shows angle of mandible at C2-3 disc.

Surgical technique

The surgical technique described earlier was used to expose the atlantoaxial region, retropharyngeal, from the right side [1]. Both the atlantoaxial joints and the anterior surfaces of the lateral masses of the atlas were exposed after dividing the medial halves of the hypertrophied longus coli and rectus capitis muscles bilaterally. The soft pannus between the anterior arch of the atlas and odontoid was excised. The anterior joint capsules were excised widely and overhanging anterior-inferior edge of the lateral masses of the atlas was reshaped with 3 mm microdrill till they were flush with the superior facet of the axis. All these maneuvers resulted in increased mobility of the atlantoaxial complex permitting skull tong assisted distraction and realignment in extension. The opposing joint surfaces were curetted and abraded till blood oozed from the both the opposing joint surfaces (gardening). Tricorticate bone grafts measuring 7 mm thickness anteriorly and 4 mm posteriorly were harvested from the right iliac crest, and using the skull tongs for distraction, the “wedge” grafts were impacted into the joints bilaterally till they had countersunk beyond the anterior edge of the joint space. A customized “T”-shaped medical grade titanium plate (3.5 mm thickness) manufactured by Bombay Orthopaedics Company (Rajkot, Gujarat, India), was contoured, and placed over the region so that the upper outer screws could be passed upward and outward onto the lateral masses and the stem of the plate sat snugly on the anterior surface of the axis (Fig. 2). Using a 3 mm microdrill bit screw holes were marked, holding the plate in position, for both lateral masses just above the medial half of the anterior-inferior edge and directed upward and laterally toward the upper lateral posterior end of the lateral mass under lateral fluoroscopy, and the axis in midline just above the C2-3-disc space under anterior-posterior fluoroscopy. Plate was first fixed to the axis with a self-drilling cortical-cancellous screw (4 mm thickness, 22 mm length) through the previously marked drill hole to achieve bicortical purchase, length calculated on CT console preoperatively, and last few mms tightened under lateral fluoroscopic guidance. Lateral masses were fixed with cortical screws (3.5 mm thickness and 18 mm length) passed through the previously drilled holes after tapping.
Figure 2

Customized modified “Ellis” plate with screws and intraoperative fluoroscopy image of plate positioning.

Customized modified “Ellis” plate with screws and intraoperative fluoroscopy image of plate positioning. As the posterior lip of foramen magnum was also impinging on the cervicomedullary region, the patient underwent posterior foramen magnum decompression after 5 days. Post-operative CT scan imaging showed improved Grabb-Oakes index of 6.3 mm and remarkable descent of the odontoid. The atlantoaxial joints had realigned with intervening countersunk bone grafts and satisfactory position of plate and screws and favorable Grabb-Oakes measurement (Fig. 3). He has shown marginal clinical improvement and is undergoing rehabilitation.
Figure 3

(a) Coronal 3D CT scan showing satisfactory implant position. (b) Coronal CT scan showing distracted realigned facets with intervening bone grafts. (c and d) Distracted repositioned facet joints with intervening tricorticate bone graft. (e) Post-operative CT shows Grabb-Oakes value 6.3 mm with descent of odontoid. (f ) Sagittal CT image after foramen magnum decompression.

(a) Coronal 3D CT scan showing satisfactory implant position. (b) Coronal CT scan showing distracted realigned facets with intervening bone grafts. (c and d) Distracted repositioned facet joints with intervening tricorticate bone graft. (e) Post-operative CT shows Grabb-Oakes value 6.3 mm with descent of odontoid. (f ) Sagittal CT image after foramen magnum decompression. Dynamic X-rays at 8 weeks and 6 months show sustained rigid fixation (Fig. 4).
Figure 4

(a) Lateral cervical spine X-ray in flexion 8 weeks post-operative. (b) Lateral cervical spine X-ray in extension 8 weeks post-operative. (c) Lateral cervical spine X-ray in flexion 6 months postoperative. (d) Lateral cervical spine X-ray in flexion 6 months post-operative.

(a) Lateral cervical spine X-ray in flexion 8 weeks post-operative. (b) Lateral cervical spine X-ray in extension 8 weeks post-operative. (c) Lateral cervical spine X-ray in flexion 6 months postoperative. (d) Lateral cervical spine X-ray in flexion 6 months post-operative.

Discussion

The weight of the cranium is transmitted from the occipital condyles on lateral masses of the atlas to the superior facets of axis which distributes, most weight to the body of the axis and some to the posterior elements through the pars of the axis to the facet joints of C2-C3 [2, 3]. The Grabb-Oakes index has become an accepted criteria to decide the extent of ventral cervicomedullary strain and surgical treatment should aim at reducing it below 9 mm [4]. Facet distraction for BI has reduced the need for odontoidectomy [5, 6]. Abnormal atlantoaxial facetal anatomical relationship in sagittal and coronal planes decides the BI severity and treatment is directed toward realignment restoration of a normal facetal relationship followed by fixation and ultimately fusion of the realigned atlantoaxial joints [7, 8, 9]. Technical descriptions of posterior approach suggest interfacet bone pieces or flat cages (parallel surfaces) which result in distraction in the slipped position and will not be in compression mode (with floating cage or bone grafts), once atlas and axis are repositioned for fixation, as the joint will open up anteriorly. However, parallel surface cages are still used because wedge-shaped cages cannot be passed from behind into joints which are inclined anteriorly and inferiorly. Lordotic wedge cages and anterior approach are biomechanically important in correcting deformity, enhancing fusion, and restoring the sagittal spinal balance [10, 11]. The posterior tension band, the muscles, and the fulcrum (axis spinous process) play an important role in limiting the anterior and inferior slip of the atlas over the axis which is supported by the fact that in most cases of congenital BI there is associated hypertrophy of the axis laminae and spinous process. Posterior atlantoaxial fixation surgery has a small but definite risk of vertebral artery injury and literature is studded with descriptions of ways to prevent and treat this devastating complication [12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. Posterior approach in spinal surgery disrupts the posterior tension band and the extensively detached muscles always heal with a scar. In addition, the intervening screw plate or rod implants prevent their reattachment to the skull and posterior elements of the atlantoaxial bones [17]. In appropriately selected cases (angle of the mandible is at or above the C2-3 disc in lateral X-ray in extension), the atlantoaxial joints can easily and safely be approached anteriorly in supine position by a unilateral submandibular retropharyngeal approach as described earlier [18, 19, 20]. This approach permits wide unhindered and safe exposure of both atlantoaxial joints for joint surface, minimal division of the anterior muscles, ligament, and joint capsule creates additional instability which is important to correct the deformity. Preparation of the joint surfaces and tricorticate “wedge” autografting in compression mode is the primal step to realign the joints and finally achieve solid bone fusion along the line of weight transmission [21]. Transoral anterior atlantoaxial joint fixation with plates and screws across each joint as described earlier can be simplified and strengthened using a single plate fixed across both joints by the retropharyngeal approach avoiding the risk of infection [22]. The body of the axis offers a large volume of bone stock and the ability to get bicortical screw hold with a larger diameter screw further enhances the fixation. This new plate screw construct is safe, easy, inexpensive, and biomechanically appealing. More cases and longer follow-up are necessary before it becomes a universal option.

Conclusion

Anterior submandibular extrapharyngeal approach to treat atlantoaxial instability and deformity is simple safe and biomechanically superior. This new plate screw construct is easy to perform, cost-efficient, and biomechanically appealing option for the treatment of symptomatic BI. Symptomatic BI needs surgery. The Grabb-Oakes index is useful to assess the extent of cervicomedullary strain. Posterior distraction of the atlantoaxial joints with fixation of the atlantoaxial joints has become the standard of care for the treatment of BI. Anterior surgery and fixation with the new plate screw construct can achieve all the goals more easily and safely.
  19 in total

1.  Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws: case series and technical note.

Authors:  Neill M Wright
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-04

2.  Anterior retropharyngeal fixation C1-2 for stabilization of atlantoaxial instabilities: study of feasibility, technical description and preliminary results.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Volker Kammermeier; Dietmar Ulbricht; Allan Assuncao; Stefan Karolus; Boris van den Berg; Ulrich Holz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Atlantoaxial joint distraction as a treatment for basilar invagination: a report of an experience with 11 cases.

Authors:  Atul Goel; Abhidha Shah
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  In reply: the severity of basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation correlates with sagittal joint inclination, coronal joint inclination, and craniocervical tilt: a description of new indices for the craniovertebral junction.

Authors:  P Sarat Chandra; Nishant Goyal
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Distraction, Compression, Extension, and Reduction Combined With Joint Remodeling and Extra-articular Distraction: Description of 2 New Modifications for Its Application in Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation: Prospective Study in 79 Cases.

Authors:  P Sarat Chandra; Manik Prabhu; Nishant Goyal; Ajay Garg; Avnish Chauhan; Bhawani Shankar Sharma
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Anterior facetal realignment and distraction for atlanto-axial subluxation with basilar invagination …. a technical note.

Authors:  Sushil Patkar
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.448

7.  A study of weight transmission through the cervical and upper thoracic regions of the vertebral column in man.

Authors:  G P Pal; R V Routal
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Epidemiology and Outcomes of Vertebral Artery Injury in 16 582 Cervical Spine Surgery Patients: An AOSpine North America Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Wellington K Hsu; Abhishek Kannan; Harry T Mai; Michael G Fehlings; Zachary A Smith; Vincent C Traynelis; Ziya L Gokaslan; Alan S Hilibrand; Ahmad Nassr; Paul M Arnold; Thomas E Mroz; Mohamad Bydon; Eric M Massicotte; Wilson Z Ray; Michael P Steinmetz; Gabriel A Smith; Jonathan Pace; Mark Corriveau; Sungho Lee; Robert E Isaacs; Jeffrey C Wang; Elizabeth L Lord; Zorica Buser; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-01

9.  Anterior Retropharyngeal Cage Distraction and Fixation for Basilar Invagination: "The Wedge Technique".

Authors:  Sushil Patkar
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-06-30

10.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): biometrical results and own experiences.

Authors:  Bartosz Kapustka; Grzegorz Kiwic; Paweł Chodakowski; Jan P Miodoński; Tomasz Wysokiński; Mariusz Łączyński; Krzysztof Paruzel; Adrian Kotas; Wiesław Marcol
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.