| Literature DB >> 35437464 |
Hu Li1, Jinfeng Li2, Peng Su1, JianJun Zhang1, Ding Ma1.
Abstract
In order to explore the effects of propofol anesthesia system based on block chain on brain tissue and brain function protection, 88 patients undergoing craniocerebral trauma surgery are selected for prospective study. The anesthetic dose of propofol during operation in the control group is determined according to general information and personal situation. The team uses blockchain to process the patient's clinical data and general information to calculate the optimal dose of propofol. The changes of hemodynamic indexes of patients in the two groups are compared, including dural incision (T1), 1 h after craniotomy (T2), end of surgery (T3), and 6 h after surgery (T4). The changes of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and central neuron-specific protein (S100β) at T1, T2, T3, and T4 in 2 groups are observed and recorded. The changes of malondialdehyde (MDA) at T1, T2, T3, and T4 are compared between the two groups. Based on the analysis of clinical data and general information of patients on blockchain, the optimal intraoperative anesthetic dose of propofol for patients can effectively protect the brain function of patients, and the intraoperative anesthesia state is relatively stable, and the changes and improvements of intraoperative indicators are good.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35437464 PMCID: PMC9013313 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6111543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 3.822
Changes of hemodynamic indexes.
| Control group ( | Study group ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAP (mmHG) | ||||
| T1 | 95.21 ± 11.23 | 96.24 ± 12.36 | −0.409 | 0.683 |
| T2 | 94.52 ± 12.31 | 93.52 ± 10.32 | 0.412 | 0.681 |
| T3 | 90.21 ± 11.32 | 85.42 ± 10.43 | 2.062 | 0.042 |
| T4 | 90.29 ± 10.27 | 84.46 ± 12.09 | 2.442 | 0.017 |
|
| 5.241 | 3.313 | ||
|
| 0.423 | <0.001 | ||
|
| ||||
| HR (time/min) | ||||
| T1 | 79.42 ± 9.32 | 80.21 ± 9.62 | −0.391 | 0.697 |
| T2 | 76.24 ± 9.36 | 78.31 ± 9.24 | −1.044 | 0.300 |
| T3 | 77.24 ± 9.17 | 76.36 ± 9.54 | 0.441 | 0.660 |
| T4 | 76.24 ± 9.52 | 78.52 ± 9.27 | −1.138 | 0.258 |
|
| 4.257 | 5.863 | ||
|
| 0.291 | 0.128 | ||
Changes of T3 and T4 indicators are statistically significant compared with T1.
Figure 1Comparison of changes in hemodynamic indexes at different time periods.
Changes of NSE and S100β indexes.
| Control group ( | Study group ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSE (ng/ml) | ||||
| T1 | 2.94 ± 0.41 | 2.91 ± 0.42 | 0.339 | 0.735 |
| T2 | 2.74 ± 0.56 | 2.78 ± 0.42 | −0.378 | 0.707 |
| T3 | 4.67 ± 1.02 | 4.01 ± 1.04 | 3.005 | 0.003 |
| T4 | 5.85 ± 1.27 | 4.72 ± 0.52 | 5.416 | <0.001 |
| F | 5.241 | 3.313 | ||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
|
| ||||
| s100 | ||||
| T1 | 1.23 ± 0.12 | 1.22 ± 0.19 | 0.297 | 0.767 |
| T2 | 1.32 ± 0.34 | 1.36 ± 0.24 |
| 0.527 |
| T3 | 1.92 ± 0.41 | 1.45 ± 0.42 | 5.312 | <0.001 |
| T4 | 2.68 ± 0.61 | 1.58 ± 0.73 | 7.684 | <0.001 |
| F | 4.257 | 5.863 | ||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
Changes of T2, T3, and T4 indicators are statistically significant compared with T1.
Figure 2Comparison of changes of NSE and S100β in different time periods.
Changes of MDA.
| Control group ( | Study group ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDA (U/L) | ||||
| T1 | 57.24 ± 10.53 | 57.32 ± 10.42 | −0.036 | 0.972 |
| T2 | 56.31 ± 10.25 | 54.21 ± 11.27 | 0.915 | 0.363 |
| T3 | 52.25 ± 9.46 | 46.63 ± 10.24 | 2.676 | 0.009 |
| T4 | 50.58 ± 10.23 | 43.13 ± 9.12 | 3.600 | 0.001 |
|
| 5.241 | 3.313 | ||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
Compared with T1, the changes of T3 and T3 indicators are statistically significant.
Figure 3Comparison of MDA index changes at different time points.