Literature DB >> 35437276

Outcome-Locked Cholinergic Signaling Suppresses Prefrontal Encoding of Stimulus Associations.

Gaqi Tu1,2, Adel Halawa3, Xiaotian Yu4, Samuel Gillman1,3, Kaori Takehara-Nishiuchi5,2,4.   

Abstract

Acetylcholine (ACh) is thought to control arousal, attention, and learning by slowly modulating cortical excitability and plasticity. Recent studies, however, discovered that cholinergic neurons emit precisely timed signals about the aversive outcome at millisecond precision. To investigate the functional relevance of such phasic cholinergic signaling, we manipulated and monitored cholinergic terminals in the mPFC while male mice associated a neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) with mildly aversive eyelid shock (US) over a short temporal gap. Optogenetic inhibition of cholinergic terminals during the US promoted the formation of the CS-US association. On the contrary, optogenetic excitation of cholinergic terminals during the US blocked the association formation. The bidirectional behavioral effects paralleled the corresponding change in the expression of an activity-regulated gene, c-Fos in the mPFC. In contrast, optogenetic inhibition of cholinergic terminals during the CS impaired associative learning, whereas their excitation had marginal effects. In parallel, photometric recording from cholinergic terminals in the mPFC revealed strong innate phasic responses to the US. With subsequent CS-US pairings, cholinergic terminals weakened the responses to the US while developing strong responses to the CS. The across-session changes in the CS- and US-evoked terminal responses were correlated with associative memory strength. These findings suggest that phasic cholinergic signaling in the mPFC exerts opposite effects on aversive associative learning depending on whether it is emitted by the outcome or the cue.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Drugs compensating for the decline of acetylcholine (ACh) are used for cognitive impairment, such as Alzheimer's disease. However, their beneficial effects are limited, demanding new strategies based on better understandings of how ACh modulates cognition. Here, we report that by manipulating ACh signals in the mPFC, we can control the strength of aversive associative learning in mice. Specifically, the suppression of ACh signals during an aversive outcome facilitated its association with a preceding cue. In contrast, the suppression of ACh signals during the cue impaired learning. Considering that this paradigm depends on the brain regions affected in Alzheimer's disease, our findings indicate that precisely timed control of ACh signals is essential to refine ACh-based strategies for cognitive enhancement.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acetylcholine; associative learning; basal forebrain; mPFC; mice; photometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35437276      PMCID: PMC9121825          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1969-21.2022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  76 in total

1.  Identification and localization of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor proteins in brain with subtype-specific antibodies.

Authors:  A I Levey; C A Kitt; W F Simonds; D L Price; M R Brann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Selective activation of a putative reinforcement signal conditions cued interval timing in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Cheng-Hang Liu; Jason E Coleman; Heydar Davoudi; Kechen Zhang; Marshall G Hussain Shuler
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Acetylcholine in cortical inference.

Authors:  Angela J Yu; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul

Review 4.  The role of cortical cholinergic afferent projections in cognition: impact of new selective immunotoxins.

Authors:  J McGaughy; B J Everitt; T W Robbins; M Sarter
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Distribution and intrinsic membrane properties of basal forebrain GABAergic and parvalbumin neurons in the mouse.

Authors:  James T McKenna; Chun Yang; Serena Franciosi; Stuart Winston; Kathleen K Abarr; Matthew S Rigby; Yuchio Yanagawa; Robert W McCarley; Ritchie E Brown
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 6.  Acetylcholine as a neuromodulator: cholinergic signaling shapes nervous system function and behavior.

Authors:  Marina R Picciotto; Michael J Higley; Yann S Mineur
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Cholinergic modulation of visual attention and working memory: dissociable effects of basal forebrain 192-IgG-saporin lesions and intraprefrontal infusions of scopolamine.

Authors:  Yogita Chudasama; Jeffrey W Dalley; Falguni Nathwani; Pascale Bouger; Trevor W Robbins; Falgyni Nathwani
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Layer-specific modulation of the prefrontal cortex by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Rogier B Poorthuis; Bernard Bloem; Benita Schak; Jordi Wester; Christiaan P J de Kock; Huibert D Mansvelder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Pharmacological Fingerprints of Contextual Uncertainty.

Authors:  Louise Marshall; Christoph Mathys; Diane Ruge; Archy O de Berker; Peter Dayan; Klaas E Stephan; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Prefrontal somatostatin interneurons encode fear memory.

Authors:  Kirstie A Cummings; Roger L Clem
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.