| Literature DB >> 35436959 |
Hongru Gao1, Xiaoyu Tong1, Wei Hu1, Yicong Wang1, Kuinyu Lee1, Xiaoqing Xu1, Jiemei Shi1, Zhenle Pei1, Wenhan Lu1, Yuning Chen1, Ruonan Zhang1, Zheyi Wang1, Ziyu Wang1, Chengzhi Han1, Yu Wang1, Yi Feng2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low-frequency electroacupuncture (EA) has been shown to ameliorate obesity and reproductive dysfunctions in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and further explorations in PCOS-like rats showed that EA could affect white adipose tissue. However, the function and neuromodulation of brown adipose tissue (BAT) in PCOS and after EA treatment have remained unknown. The present study focused on the role of BAT in PCOS-like rats and its relationship with EA and characterized the three-dimensional (3D) innervation of BAT associated with activation molecules.Entities:
Keywords: Brown adipose tissue; Electroacupuncture; Polycystic ovary syndrome; Sympathetic innervation; Uncoupling protein 1
Year: 2022 PMID: 35436959 PMCID: PMC9016980 DOI: 10.1186/s13020-022-00603-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med ISSN: 1749-8546 Impact factor: 4.546
Incubation times for inmmunostaining
| Buffer | Small tissue | Large tissue | Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary antibody incubation | 3 days | 4-5 days | 37 ℃ |
| Secondary antibody incubation | 3 days | 4-5 days | 37 ℃ |
The approximate weight of small tissue is < 300 mg
Fig. 1PCOS-like rats and obese rats represented the obesity phenotype and exhibited an increase of WAT and a decrease in scapular BAT, and EA reversed this situation. Rats at the age of 21 days were implanted with DHT to induce a PCOS-like phenotype, and the other group was fed a high-fat diet to induce an obese phenotype. After 8 weeks of DHT treatment, rats in the PCOS + EA and obesity + EA groups received EA treatments for 4 weeks. A Body weights of the rats in each group. The arrow indicates the beginning of the EA treatment. B Weights of the inguinal fat pad, mesenteric fat, and periovarian fat. C Weight of the anterior tibial muscle and soleus muscle. D Scapular BAT micro CT images. D’ Volume of scapular BAT. E Scapular BAT in each group. E’ Weight of scapular BAT. Results are presented as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. Control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. Obesity group; †p < 0.05, ††p < 0.01, †††p < 0.001 vs. PCOS group (n = 6)
Profiles of endocrine, metabolism, and liver function alterations in each group (n = 6)
| Control | Obesity | Obesity + EA | PCOS | PCOS + EA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose metabolism | |||||
| Fasting insulin (uIU/ml) | 15.38 ± 0.60 | ||||
| Fasting glucose (mmol/l) | 5.03 ± 0.09 | 5.14 ± 0.17 | 4.91 ± 0.22 | 5.53 ± 0.09 | |
| OGTT | |||||
| Glucose 30 min (mmol/l) | 8.35 ± 0.70 | 9.09 ± 0.40 | 8.01 ± 0.39 | 7.96 ± 0.31 | 7.23 ± 0.21 |
| Glucose 60 min (mmol/l) | 7.78 ± 0.75 | 8.63 ± 0.51 | 8.30 ± 0.30 | 7.80 ± 0.22 | 7.65 ± 0.15 |
| Glucose 90 min (mmol/l) | 6.43 ± 0.22 | 7.86 ± 0.20 | 6.56 ± 0.18 | 6.63 ± 0.13 | |
| Glucose 120 min (mmol/l) | 5.51 ± 0.70 | 7.13 ± 0.21 | 5.84 ± 0.15 | 5.49 ± 0.11 | |
| Glucose AUC | 13.10 ± 0.10 | 15.10 ± 0.19 | |||
| HOMA-IR | 3.89 ± 0.20 | ||||
| Lipid profile | |||||
| TC (mmol/l) | 1.90 ± 0.05 | ||||
| TG (mmol/l) | 0.86 ± 0.04 | ||||
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 0.99 ± 0.08 | ||||
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | |||
| Leptin (ng/ml) | 1.41 ± 0.05 | ||||
| ApoE (ng/ml) | 72.10 ± 4.74 | 104.05 ± 4.12 | |||
| FFA (nmol/ml) | 300.26 ± 13.96 | ||||
| Chemerin (ng/ml) | 3.73 ± 0.20 | 5.01 ± 0.37 | |||
| Liver function | |||||
| ALT (U/L) | 20.69 ± 2.01 | ||||
| AST (U/L) | 20.04 ± 1.62 | ||||
| CRP (ug/ml) | 3.212 ± 0.16 | 4.77 ± 0.23 | |||
| ALD (ng/L) | 255.58 ± 16.30 | ||||
Results are presented as means ± SEM, and multiple comparisons between different groups were performed by one-way ANOVA. The bold showed the data with significant differences compared with either control or another two non-EA group. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant
TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ApoE apolipoprotein E, FFA free fatty acid, OGTT oral glucose tolerance test, Glucose AUC area under curve = 0.5 × (BG0 + BG30)/2 + 0.5 × (BG30 + BG60)/2 + 0.5 × (BG60 + BG90)/2 + 0.5 × (BG90 + BG120)/2, HOMA-IR homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance = fasting insulin (mU/l) × fasting glucose (mmol/l)/22.5, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, CRP C-reactive protein
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. Control; #p < 0.05, # #p < 0.01, # ##p < 0.001 vs. Obesity; †p < 0.05, ††p < 0.01, †††p < 0.001 vs. PCOS
Fig. 2EA ameliorated PCOS acyclicity and gonadal hormone disorder. A H&E staining showing that the ovaries of the PCOS group were smaller than controls and had only a few corpora lutea and had more cystic follicles. B Estrous cycle in each group. The arrow indicates the beginning of the EA treatment. C Gonadal hormone profile in each group. E2 17β-estradiol, T testosterone, DHT dihydrotestosterone, P4 progesterone, SHBG sex hormone binding globulin. Results are presented as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. Control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. Obesity group; †p < 0.05, ††p < 0.01, †††p < 0.001 vs. PCOS group (n = 6)
Fig. 3EA significantly activated scapular BAT through sympathetic stimulation in PCOS rats. (A–D) UCP1 and TH protein expression level in scapular BAT, inguinal WAT, mesenteric WAT, and periovarian WAT. Results are presented as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. Control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. Obesity group; †p < 0.05, ††p < 0.01, †††p < 0.001 vs. PCOS group (n = 6)
Fig. 4EA spatially increases the expression of UCP1 and TH in scapular BAT. A Expression of UCP1 (red) in each group. B 3D reconstruction of TH (green) in each group. C Representative 3D projections of BAT co-immunolabeled by TH (green) and UCP1 (red). D Co-localization of TH (green) and UCP1 (red) in tissue slices.
Fig. 5EA obviously ameliorates chronic inflammation of WAT in obese rats. A–D Transcript level of Il-6 and Il-1β in scapular BAT, inguinal WAT, mesenteric WAT, and periovarian WAT. A’–D’ Protein expression level of IL-6 and IL-1β in scapular BAT, inguinal WAT, mesenteric WAT, and periovarian WAT. Results are presented as means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. Control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. Obesity group; †p < 0.05, ††p < 0.01, †††p < 0.001 vs. PCOS group (n = 6)