| Literature DB >> 35436762 |
Soanandrasana Rahelinirina1, Mireille Harimalala2, Jerry Rakotoniaina3, Mamy Gabriel Randriamanantsoa4, Catherine Dentinger5,6, Sarah Zohdy6, Romain Girod2, Minoarisoa Rajerison1.
Abstract
Plague, a zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis, remains a major public health threat in Madagascar. To better understand the risk of transmission to humans and to guide targeted plague prevention and control measures, a survey of Y. pestis infection and exposure in mammals and their fleas was implemented. Small mammals were captured in five districts of Madagascar ranging in levels of plague endemicity, as measured by notified cases, from none to active foci. Blood and spleen samples and fleas were collected from small mammals for the detection of anti-Y. pestis F1 antibodies by ELISA, F1 antigens by rapid diagnostic tests, and pla, caf1, and inv genes by polymerase chain reaction. Some rodent fleas were kept alive and reared in the insectary to assess susceptibility to insecticides. Blood was also collected from 15 dogs and tested for anti-F1 antibodies. A total of 557 spleens, 484 sera, and 1,539 fleas were collected from 557 rodents and shrews. Nineteen (3.4%) spleens were positive for F1 antigen, most from Toamasina (N = 13), a historical plague focus. One dog was also found seropositive in Toamasina. Twenty-two (4.5%) serologic specimens from small mammals were positive for anti-F1 antibodies. The flea index was highest in the city of Antananarivo (8.8). No flea was positive for Y. pestis DNA. Flea populations exhibited resistance to various insecticides weakening the efficacy of vector control. This study highlights the potential use of animal-based surveillance to identify the risk of plague transmission in endemic and nonendemic foci for targeted prevention and control.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35436762 PMCID: PMC9209941 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg ISSN: 0002-9637 Impact factor: 3.707
Figure 1.Map of Madagascar showing the study sites ranging by plague endemicity levels.
Distribution of small mammal species trapped in 15 study sites within five districts, Madagascar, December 2018–May 2019
| Districts | Sites | No. captured animals |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsiroanomandidy (active plague focus) | Ambatofotsy FEO | 72 | 5 | 0 | 65 | 2 |
| Ambohipeno | 35 | 10 | 0 | 24 | 1 | |
| Miandrarivo | 59 | 16 | 0 | 39 | 4 | |
| TOTAL (%) | 166 | 31 (18.7%) | 0 | 128 (77.1%) | 7 (4.2%) | |
| Antananarivo Renivohitra (plague focus with sporadic cases) | Ambanidia | 28 | 9 | 16 | 0 | 3 |
| Anosizato Est | 18 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 1 | |
| Tsaramasay | 17 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (%) | 63 | 17 (27.0%) | 42 (66.7%) | 0 | 4 (6.3%) | |
| Betafo (latent focus) | Ambohimanambola | 44 | 18 | 0 | 26 | 0 |
| Andratsaimahamasina | 47 | 13 | 0 | 34 | 0 | |
| Malaza | 40 | 13 | 0 | 27 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (%) | 131 | 44 (33.6%) | 0 | 87 (66.4%) | 0 | |
| Ihosy (no plague human cases) | Ankily | 43 | 17 | 0 | 26 | 0 |
| Sahambano | 57 | 24 | 0 | 33 | 0 | |
| Zazafotsy | 31 | 14 | 0 | 17 | 0 | |
| TOTAL (%) | 131 | 55 (42.0%) | 0 | 76 (58.0%) | 0 | |
| Toamasina (historic focus) | Ampanalana | 26 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 10 |
| Mahatsinjo | 20 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 4 | |
| Sandranentana | 20 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 2 | |
| Total (%) | 66 | 4 (6.1%) | 5 (7.6%) | 41 (62.1%) | 16 (24.2%) | |
| Total (%) | 557 | 151 (27.1%) | 47 (8.4%) | 332 (59.6%) | 27 (4.9%) |
Plague risk indicators obtained from small mammal species trapped in 15 study sites within five districts, Madagascar, December 2018–May 2019
| Trap site | Small mammal species | No. captured | Fleas | FI | RDT positive no. (%) [95% CI] | Seropositive no. (%) [95% CI] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsiroanomandidy (active plague focus) | Indoor | MM | 31 | 3 | 0.1 | 1 (3.2) [0.1–16.7] | 0 |
| RR | 113 | 219 | 1.9 | 2 (1.8) [0.2–6.2] | 17 (15.0) [9.0–23.0] | ||
| SM | 7 | 12 | 1.7 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Outdoor | RR | 15 | 61 | 4.1 | 0 | 1 (6.7) [0.2–31.9] | |
| Antananarivo Renivohitra (plague focus with sporadic cases) | Indoor | MM | 17 | 6 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
| RN | 42 | 425 | 10.1 | 0 | 1 (2.4) [0.1–12.8] | ||
| SM | 4 | 1 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Betafo (latent focus) | Indoor | MM | 44 | 4 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
| RR | 73 | 248 | 3.4 | 3 (4.1) [0.9–11.5] | 0 | ||
| Outdoor | RR | 14 | 5 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ihosy (no plague human cases) | Indoor | MM | 55 | 14 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
| RR | 72 | 477 | 6.6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Outdoor | RR | 4 | 1 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Toamasina (historic plague focus) | Indoor | MM | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| RN | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| RR | 41 | 24 | 0.4 | 3 (7.3) [1.5–19.9] | 1 (2.4) [0.1–12.8] | ||
| SM | 15 | 1 | 0.1 | 9 (60.0) [32.3–83.7] | 1 (6.7) [0.2–31.9] | ||
| Outdoor | SM | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 (100.0) [2.5–100] | 1 (100.0) [2.5–100] | |
| Total | 557 | 1,539 | 2.8 | 19 (3.4) [2.1–5.3] | 22 (3.9) [2.5–5.9] |
CI = confidence interval; FI = flea index; MM = Mus musculus; RDT = rapid diagnostic test; RR = Rattus rattus; RN = Rattus norvegicus; SM = Suncus murinus.
Plague risk indicators obtained from the 15 study sites within five districts, Madagascar, December 2018–May 2019
| Districts | Sites | No. captured animals | Trap success | FI (no. flea) | Flea infestation no. (%) [95% CI] | Sero positive no. (%) [95% CI] | RDT positive no. (%) [95% CI] | Domestic dwelling fleas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsiroanomandidy (active plague focus) | Ambatofotsy FEO | 72 | 30.0 | 2.7 (191) | 48 (66.7) [54.6–77.3] | 4 (5.6) [1.5–13.6] | 2 (2.8) [0.3–9.7] | 39 |
| Andranovelona | 35 | 14.6 | 1.1 (39) | 16 (45.7) [28.8–63.3] | 3 (8.8) [1.9–23.7] | 1 (2.9) [0.1–14.9] | 37 | |
| Miandrarivo | 59 | 24.6 | 1.1 (65) | 22 (37.3) [25.0–50.8] | 11 (19.0) [9.9–31.4] | 0 | 47 | |
| Antananarivo (plague focus with sporadic cases) | Ambanidia | 28 | 15.6 | 5.0 (140) | 16 (57.1) [37.2–75.5] | 1 (3.6) [0.1–18.3] | 0 | 23 |
| Anosizato est | 18 | 10.0 | 7.9 (142) | 12 (66.7) [41.0–86.7] | 0 | 0 | 13 | |
| Tsaramasay | 17 | 9.4 | 8.8 (150) | 14 (82.4) [56.6–96.2] | 0 | 0 | 31 | |
| Betafo (latent focus) | Ambohimanambola | 44 | 18.3 | 1.6 (71) | 19 (43.2) [28.3–59.0] | 0 | 3 (6.8) [1.4–18.7] | 545 |
| Andratsaimahamasina | 47 | 19.6 | 1.8 (86) | 23 (48.9) [34.1–63.9] | 0 | 0 | 489 | |
| Malaza | 40 | 16.7 | 2.5 (100) | 18 (45.0.) [29.2–61.5] | 0 | 0 | 94 | |
| Ihosy (no plague human cases) | Ankily | 43 | 17.9 | 2.0 (86) | 19 (44.2) [29.1–60.1] | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| Sahambano | 57 | 23.8 | 3.7 (212) | 31 (54.4) [40.7–67.6] | 0 | 0 | 287 | |
| Zazafotsy | 31 | 12.9 | 6.3 (194) | 19 (61.3) [42.2–78.1] | 0 | 0 | 216 | |
| Toamasina (historic plague focus) | Ampanalana | 26 | 10.8 | 1.9 (50) | 6 (23.1) [9.0–43.6] | 1 (5.6) [0.1–27.3] | 6 (23.1) [9.0–43.6] | 0 |
| Mahatsinjo | 20 | 8.3 | 0.1 (1) | 4 (20.0) [5.7–43.7] | 1 (5.0) [0.1–24.9] | 5 (25.0) [8.7–49.1] | 0 | |
| Sandranentana | 20 | 8.3 | 0.6 (12) | 1 (5.0) [0.1–24.9] | 0 | 2 (10.0) [1.2–31.7] | 0 |
CI = confidence interval; FI = flea index; RDT = rapid diagnostic test.
Mortality rates of fleas from 11 study sites within five districts, Madagascar, exposed to fenitrothion 1%, deltamethrin 0.05% and/or permethrin 0.75%
| Districts | Sites | Fenitrothion, 1% | Permethrin, 0.75% | Deltamethrin, 0.05% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsiroanomandidy (active plague focus) | Ambatofotsy FEO indoor | 67.5 | 61.8 | 32.5 |
| Ambatofotsy FEO outdoor | 45.0 | – | 10.0 | |
| Ambohipeno | 57.5 | 35.0 | 15.0 | |
| Miandrarivo | – | – | – | |
| Antananarivo (plague focus with sporadic cases) | Ambanidia | 97.5 | 20.0 | 82.5 |
| Anosizato est | – | 50.0 | 25.0 | |
| Tsaramasay | 100.0 | 35.0 | – | |
| Betafo (latent focus) | Ambohimanambola | 100.0 | 20.0 | – |
| Andratsay | – | – | – | |
| Malaza | 62.5 | 62.5 | 42.5 | |
| Ihosy (no plague human cases) | Ankily | – | – | – |
| Sahambano | 20.0 | – | – | |
| Zazafotsy | 35.0 | – | – | |
| Toamasina (historic plague focus) | Ampanalana | 17.5 | 17.5 | 20.0 |
| Mahatsinjo | – | – | – | |
| Sandranentana | 52.5 | – | – |