Oren Auster1, Uriah Finkel1, Noa Dagan1,2,3,4, Noam Barda1,2,3,4, Alon Laufer5,6, Ran D Balicer1,5,7, Shay Ben-Shachar1,4,8. 1. Clalit Research Institute, Innovation Division, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2. Software and Information Systems Engineering, Ben Gurion University, Be'er Sheva, Israel. 3. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. The Ivan and Francesca Berkowitz Family Living Laboratory Collaboration, at Harvard Medical School and Clalit Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel. 6. School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. 7. School of Public Health, Ben Gurion University, Be'er Sheva, Israel. 8. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
On July 29, 2021, concerns of waning immunity after Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162B2 mRNA vaccination led the Israeli Ministry of Health to start a campaign to administer booster (third) doses to individuals who received their second dose at least 5 months prior.[1,2] The booster was initially approved for individuals 60 years or older. This survey study assessed the occurrence of adverse effects (AEs) in adults 60 years or older who received a booster dose.
Methods
This study was conducted among members of Clalit Health Services (CHS), which insures more than half of the Israeli population. Study participants were individuals 60 years or older who received the booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the first 5 days of the campaign (July 30 to August 3, 2021). The CHS institutional review board approved this study, with a waiver of informed consent because deidentified survey data were used. This study followed the AAPOR reporting guideline for survey studies.Individuals aged 60 to 79 years were sent a text message with a request to complete an online survey (eTable in the Supplement) regarding AEs. For those 80 years or older, a random sample (41.8%) was contacted by telephone and interviewed.The survey process comprised 2 sequential surveys conducted 5 to 11 days (August 8-10, 2021) and 20 to 28 days (August 23-26, 2021) after the initiation of the campaign. For participants who responded to both surveys, we considered only the latter response. Individuals’ demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from their electronic health records.
Results
Of 82 392 CHS members 60 years or older who received a booster dose during the study period, 66 094 were contacted, with 27 046 (40.9%) responding to the survey. The median age of respondents was 71 years (IQR, 66-75 years); 43.6% of respondents were aged 60 to 69 years; 44.5%, 70 to 79 years; and 12.0%, 80 years or older. The proportion of female respondents was 45.3%, and 49.2% had at least 1 risk factor for severe COVID-19 (Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population
Characteristic
No. (%)
Respondents (N = 27 046)
Nonrespondents (N = 39 020)
Age, median (IQR)
71 (65-75)
71 (66-76)
Age group
60-69
11 779 (43.6)
16 212 (41.5)
70-79
12 035 (44.5)
18 257 (46.8)
≥80
3232 (12.0)
4551 (11.7)
Sex
Female
12 258 (45.3)
18 619 (47.7)
Male
14 788 (54.7)
20 401 (52.3)
Population sector
General Jewish
25 781 (95.3)
36 124 (92.6)
Ultra-Orthodox Jewish
544 (2.0)
1056 (2.7)
Arab
719 (2.7)
1835 (4.7)
Other
2 (<0.1)
5 (<0.1)
Socioeconomic status
Low
3925 (14.5)
8762 (22.5)
Medium
11 977 (44.3)
17 185 (44.0)
High
10 970 (40.6)
12 618 (32.3)
Missing
174 (0.6)
455 (1.2)
Nursing home resident
320 (1.2)
1331 (3.4)
Risk factors for severe COVID-19a
0
13 740 (50.8)
18 157 (46.5)
1
9100 (33.6)
13 576 (34.8)
2
3092 (11.4)
5264 (13.5)
≥3 or more
1114 (4.1)
2023 (5.2)
Based on US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria.
Based on US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria.Of the respondents, 30.0% reported at least 1 AE, 24.8% reported local reactions, and 16.6% reported systemic reactions. The most common AEs included pain at the injection site (23.5%), fatigue (9.7%), and malaise (7.2%) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Reports of Adverse Events According to Sex and Age Group
Variable
Respondents, No. (%)
Total
Sex
Age, y
Female
Male
60-69
70-79
≥80
Any adverse event
8120 (30.0)
4778 (39.0)
3342 (22.6)
3915 (33.2)
3005 (25.0)
1200 (37.0)
Local reaction
6713 (24.8)
4082 (33.3)
2631 (17.8)
3283 (27.9)
2421 (20.1)
1009 (31.1)
Pain at injection site
6346 (23.5)
3853 (31.4)
2493 (16.9)
3109 (26.4)
2288 (19.0)
949 (29.2)
Swelling at injection site
1399 (5.2)
1051 (8.6)
348 (2.4)
688 (5.8)
503 (4.2)
208 (6.4)
Axillary swelling in the injected arm
356 (1.3)
297 (2.4)
59 (0.4)
228 (1.9)
100 (0.8)
28 (0.9)
Other local reaction
1116 (4.1)
773 (6.3)
343 (2.3)
560 (4.8)
437 (3.6)
119 (3.7)
Systemic reaction
4495 (16.6)
2811 (22.9)
1684 (11.4)
2418 (20.5)
1635 (13.6)
442 (13.6)
Fatigue
2634 (9.7)
1727 (14.1)
907 (6.1)
1419 (12.0)
924 (7.7)
291 (9.0)
Malaise
1950 (7.2)
1316 (10.7)
634 (4.3)
1114 (9.5)
660 (5.5)
176 (5.4)
Muscle ache
1506 (5.6)
1041 (8.5)
465 (3.1)
901 (7.6)
500 (4.2)
105 (3.2)
Headache
1326 (4.9)
908 (7.4)
418 (2.8)
771 (6.5)
445 (3.7)
110 (3.4)
Low-grade fever (<38°C)
864 (3.2)
553 (4.5)
311 (2.1)
481 (4.1)
325 (2.7)
58 (1.8)
Joint aches
670 (2.5)
471 (3.8)
199 (1.3)
399 (3.4)
202 (1.7)
69 (2.1)
Nausea
416 (1.5)
325 (2.7)
91 (0.6)
253 (2.1)
115 (1.0)
48 (1.5)
Temperature >38°C
423 (1.6)
290 (2.4)
133 (0.9)
258 (2.2)
135 (1.1)
30 (0.9)
Vomiting or diarrhea
167 (0.6)
123 (1.0)
44 (0.3)
82 (0.7)
60 (0.5)
25 (0.8)
Chest pains
159 (0.6)
103 (0.8)
56 (0.4)
92 (0.8)
52 (0.4)
15 (0.5)
Shortness of breath
110 (0.4)
65 (0.5)
45 (0.3)
56 (0.5)
32 (0.3)
22 (0.7)
Irregular pulse
135 (0.5)
103 (0.8)
32 (0.2)
79 (0.7)
40 (0.3)
16 (0.5)
Disseminated rash
50 (0.2)
29 (0.2)
21 (0.1)
28 (0.2)
16 (0.1)
6 (0.2)
Facial rash
12 (0.0)
11 (0.1)
1 (0.0)
8 (0.1)
2 (0.0)
2 (0.1)
Other systemic reactions
464 (1.7)
271 (2.2)
193 (1.3)
200 (1.7)
178 (1.5)
86 (2.6)
Medical attention for any adverse event
314 (1.2)
187 (1.5)
127 (0.9)
156 (1.3)
104 (0.9)
54 (1.7)
Symptom duration, d
<1
2350 (8.7)
1265 (10.3)
1085 (7.3)
1119 (9.5)
819 (6.8)
412 (12.7)
1-3
1340 (5.0)
903 (7.4)
437 (3.0)
637 (5.4)
502 (4.2)
201 (6.2)
>3
4330 (16.0)
2567 (20.9)
1763 (11.9)
2115 (18.0)
1639 (13.6)
576 (17.7)
Cannot recall
100 (0.4)
43 (0.4)
57 (0.4)
44 (0.4)
45 (0.4)
11 (0.3)
Adverse events after second dose
Any reaction
6198 (22.9)
3733 (30.5)
2465 (16.7)
3309 (28.1)
2238 (18.6)
651 (20.0)
No reaction
20 384 (75.4)
8288 (67.6)
12 096 (81.8)
8238 (69.9)
9595 (79.8)
2551 (78.6)
Cannot recall
464 (1.7)
237 (1.9)
227 (1.5)
232 (2.0)
187 (1.6)
45 (1.4)
Third-dose reactions vs second-dose reactions
Felt better
5064 (18.7)
2266 (18.5)
2798 (18.9)
2537 (21.5)
2171 (18.1)
356 (11.0)
Felt similar
18 345 (67.8)
7818 (63.8)
10 527 (71.2)
7479 (63.5)
8412 (70.0)
2454 (75.6)
Felt worse
3008 (11.1)
1857 (15.1)
1151 (7.8)
1506 (12.8)
1167 (9.7)
335 (10.3)
Cannot recall
629 (2.3)
317 (2.6)
312 (2.1)
257 (2.2)
270 (2.2)
102 (3.1)
Most of the respondents (67.8%) reported that their general feeling after the booster was similar to the feeling after the second dose; 18.7% and 11.1% reported a milder or worse response, respectively. Only 1.2% sought medical attention owing to an AE.Females were more likely than males to report AEs (39.0% vs 22.6%). The proportion of females who reported systemic reactions was nearly double that of males (22.9% vs 11.4%). Individuals aged 60 to 69 years were more likely to report systemic AEs than were individuals 70 years or older (20.5% vs 13.6%).
Discussion
We found that AEs after the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine booster dose were generally mild and usually did not require medical care. The proportion of self-reported AEs that occurred in our study was similar or lower than that after the administration of the second vaccine dose in several previous studies.[3,4] A study by Menni et al[4] found a similar proportion of systemic reactions among older individuals after the second vaccine dose as after the third dose in our study (16.4% vs 16.6%).The proportion of female respondents who reported systemic AEs was greater than the proportion of male respondents, with higher proportions among participants in the younger age group (60-69 years) than in the older age groups. Similar results were reported in previous studies after administration of the second vaccine dose.[3,4,5] A limitation of our study was the different survey methods in different age groups, which might have resulted in differences in reported proportions of AEs.
Authors: Fernando P Polack; Stephen J Thomas; Nicholas Kitchin; Judith Absalon; Alejandra Gurtman; Stephen Lockhart; John L Perez; Gonzalo Pérez Marc; Edson D Moreira; Cristiano Zerbini; Ruth Bailey; Kena A Swanson; Satrajit Roychoudhury; Kenneth Koury; Ping Li; Warren V Kalina; David Cooper; Robert W Frenck; Laura L Hammitt; Özlem Türeci; Haylene Nell; Axel Schaefer; Serhat Ünal; Dina B Tresnan; Susan Mather; Philip R Dormitzer; Uğur Şahin; Kathrin U Jansen; William C Gruber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cristina Menni; Kerstin Klaser; Anna May; Lorenzo Polidori; Joan Capdevila; Panayiotis Louca; Carole H Sudre; Long H Nguyen; David A Drew; Jordi Merino; Christina Hu; Somesh Selvachandran; Michela Antonelli; Benjamin Murray; Liane S Canas; Erika Molteni; Mark S Graham; Marc Modat; Amit D Joshi; Massimo Mangino; Alexander Hammers; Anna L Goodman; Andrew T Chan; Jonathan Wolf; Claire J Steves; Ana M Valdes; Sebastien Ourselin; Tim D Spector Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Sarah Cuschieri; Michael Borg; Steve Agius; Jorgen Souness; Andre Brincat; Victor Grech Journal: Int J Clin Pract Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 3.149