Literature DB >> 35435567

Rational design and fabrication of monophasic bioceramic microspheres with enhanced mechanical and biological performances in reconstruction of segmental bone defect.

Yu Cong1, Zhong Liang2, Ni Jianping2, Hu Wenyue2, Ghamor-Amegavi Edem Prince3,4, Xiangfeng Zhang3,4.   

Abstract

Over the past decades, there has been extensive study on the design of porous bioceramic scaffolds with controlled bioactivity and biodegradation in bone tissue repair. A variety of suggestive models and concepts have been proposed with regard to the role of microstructure and composition of biomaterials which affect new bone tissue growth. However, it is a challenge to fabricate functional scaffolds with the desired physiological properties and osteogenic potentials that is comparable to the bone's natural healing time scale. We demonstrate a one-step versatile fabrication of a single-phase and homogenously mixed bioactive load-bearing scaffolds (Sr-CS, CaSiO3/Ca2SiO4, and CaP) with superior biological properties in a critical size bone defect (Ø ~ 6.0 × 8.0 mm). In vivo study revealed the CaSiO3/Ca2SiO4 scaffold had the best amount of new bone growth and osteogenic repair. The Sr-CS exhibited an adequate pore network for rapid inorganic exchange and moderate mechanical stability; however, the CaSiO3/Ca2SiO4 saw over-fast resorption and mass loss compared to the Sr-CS and CaP. On the other hand, the CaP scaffold saw mechanically outstanding elastroplastine and stability but had limited biodegradation of its constructs which retarded new cancellous bone growth. The CaSiO3/Ca2SiO4 group saw superior acceleration and formation of mineralized new bone tissues in the defect. Moreover, the CaSiO3/Ca2SiO4 showed appreciable decay of the biomaterials beneficial for osteogenic cell activity. The dramatic stimulation of bone repair and angiogenesis with the CaSiO3/Ca2SiO4 suggests a promising application of this novel bioactive scaffold in the repair of skeletal defects. Systemic representation of the fabricated microspheres with in vivo and in vitro study analysis.
© 2022. International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healing time scale; Load-bearing scaffold; Osteogenic cell activity; Single phase scaffold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35435567     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-022-02571-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  24 in total

Review 1.  Bioactive composite materials for tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Aldo R Boccaccini; Jonny J Blaker
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  The correlation of pore morphology, interconnectivity and physical properties of 3D ceramic scaffolds with bone ingrowth.

Authors:  Anthony C Jones; Christoph H Arns; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Bruce K Milthorpe; Adrian P Sheppard; Mark A Knackstedt
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  In vitro degradation, bioactivity, and cytocompatibility of calcium silicate, dimagnesium silicate, and tricalcium phosphate bioceramics.

Authors:  Siyu Ni; Jiang Chang
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 2.646

4.  Trabecular bone response to injectable calcium phosphate (Ca-P) cement.

Authors:  E M Ooms; J G C Wolke; J P C M van der Waerden; J A Jansen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-07

5.  The enhancement of bone regeneration by a combination of osteoconductivity and osteostimulation using β-CaSiO3/β-Ca3(PO4)2 composite bioceramics.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Yang Xue; Kaili Lin; Jianxi Lu; Jiang Chang; Jiao Sun
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Silicate bioceramics enhanced vascularization and osteogenesis through stimulating interactions between endothelia cells and bone marrow stromal cells.

Authors:  Haiyan Li; Ke Xue; Ni Kong; Kai Liu; Jiang Chang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  A novel bioactive porous CaSiO3 scaffold for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Siyu Ni; Jiang Chang; Lee Chou
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  Osteogenesis and angiogenesis induced by porous β-CaSiO(3)/PDLGA composite scaffold via activation of AMPK/ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt pathways.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Kaili Lin; Jiang Chang; Jiao Sun
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Integrin binding and MAPK signal pathways in primary cell responses to surface chemistry of calcium silicate cements.

Authors:  Ming-You Shie; Shinn-Jyh Ding
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Histological evaluation of the bone response to calcium phosphate cement implanted in cortical bone.

Authors:  E M Ooms; J G C Wolke; M T van de Heuvel; B Jeschke; J A Jansen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.