Literature DB >> 35435203

[A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of three-dimensional changes of circummaxillary sutures following maxillary protraction with alternate rapid palatal expansions and constrictions].

W T Liu1, Y R Wang1, X D Wang1, Y H Zhou1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess three-dimensional (3D) changes of circummaxillary sutures following maxillary protraction with alternate rapid palatal expansions and constrictions (RPE/C) facemask protocol in maxillary retrusive children, and to investigate the relationship between the changes of circum-maxillary sutures and zygomaticomaxillary suture (ZMS) maturation, and to explore the factors of maxilla forward movement with RPE/C and facemask.
METHODS: In the study (clinical trial registration No: ChiCTR2000034909), 36 maxillary retrusive patients were recruited and block randomized to either the rapid palatal expansion (RPE) group or the RPE/C group. Patients aged 7 to 13 years, Class Ⅲ malocclusion, anterior crossbite, ANB less than 0°, Wits appraisal less than -2 mm, and A-Np less than 0 mm were included in the study. The RPE group received rapid palatal expansion, whereas the RPE/C group received alternate rapid palatal expansions and constrictions, and both with facemask protraction. Head orientations of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were implemented by Dolphin 11.7. 3D measurements of circummaxillary sutures on CBCT images were evaluated using Mimics 10.01 before (T0) and after treatment (T1). The changes were analyzed with independent t test, two-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation and regression analysis.
RESULTS: Two subjects in the RPE/C group were lost to follow-up. A total of 34 patients reached the completion criteria and were analyzed. Compared with the RPE group, sagittal changes of circummaxillary sutures were significantly increased in the RPE/C group with 1.21 mm advancement of zygomaticotemporal suture, 2.20 mm of ZMS, 1.43 mm of zygoma-ticofrontal suture (P < 0.05, respectively). Except for the zygomaticotemporal suture, the rest forward sagittal changes of other circummaxillary sutures showed no major difference in terms of the ZMS maturation. The Spearman's correlation in RPE/C indicated a strong positive correlation of sagittal changes between ZMS and point A (P < 0.01) with a regression analysis R2=42.5%.
CONCLUSION: RPE/C might be more effective on the treatment of maxillary retrusive children. As one of the major mechanical loading sutures during orthopedic therapy, ZMS showed a strong positive correlation with point A on sagittal changes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone-beam computed tomography; Cranial sutures; Malocclusion, angle class Ⅲ; Maxilla; Palatal expansion technique

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35435203      PMCID: PMC9069022     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  30 in total

1.  A new protocol for maxillary protraction in cleft patients: repetitive weekly protocol of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions.

Authors:  Eric Jein-Wein Liou; Wen-Ching Tsai
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2005-03

2.  Does Alt-RAMEC protocol and facemask treatment affect dentoalveolar structures?

Authors:  Elvan Önem Özbilen; Hanife Nuray Yılmaz; Yasemin Bahar Acar
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparison of the effects of face mask treatment started simultaneously and after the completion of the alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction procedure.

Authors:  Bilge H Canturk; Mevlut Celikoglu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Skeletal, soft tissue, and airway changes following the alternate maxillary expansions and constrictions protocol.

Authors:  Berza Sen Yilmaz; Nazan Kucukkeles
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Three-dimensional comparative evaluation of customized bone-anchored vs tooth-borne maxillary protraction in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Shuran Liang; Fan Wang; Qiao Chang; Yuxing Bai
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Weitao Liu; Yanheng Zhou; Xuedong Wang; Dawei Liu; Shaonan Zhou
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Constriction (Alt-RAMEC) May Be More Effective Than Rapid Maxillary Expansion Alone for Protraction Facial Mask Treatment.

Authors:  Tingting Zhao; Fang Hua; Hong He
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 5.267

Review 8.  Cone Beam Computed Tomographic imaging in orthodontics.

Authors:  W C Scarfe; B Azevedo; S Toghyani; A G Farman
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.291

9.  Long-term efficacy of reverse pull headgear therapy.

Authors:  Andrew P Wells; David M Sarver; William R Proffit
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  A Retrospective Evaluation of Conventional Rapid Maxillary Expansion versus Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Constriction Protocol Combined with Protraction Headgear in the Management of Developing Skeletal Class III Malocclusion.

Authors:  Prathapan Parayaruthottam; Vincy Antony; P G Francis; Gazanafer Roshan
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2018-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.