Literature DB >> 35435193

[Clinical efficacy of 585 nm Q-switched laser treatment on inflammatory lesion and postinflammatory erythema of acne vulgaris].

X X Wang1, Z Z Li1, Y Y Lai1, L Yang1, L L Shi1, S M Zhong1, Y Wu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 585 nm Q-switched laser in the treatment of acne inflammatory lesions and postinflammatory erythema.
METHODS: A total of 25 patients with moderate facial acne, symmetrical distribution of inflammatory lesions and postinflammatory erythema on both sides of the face, were enrolled. Among the 25 patients, 22 patients completed all the treatment and evaluation, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. 585 nm Q-switched laser was used on a randomly selected side of the face for three times of treatment at a 2 week interval. The evaluations were made before each treatment, 2 and 4 weeks after the last treatment, therefore the evaluation time points were before the treatment, weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8, respectively, for a total of 5 times. Acne severity was assessed using the investigator' s global assessment (IGA) score, and erythema severity was assessed using the investigator' s subjective erythema score and narrow-spectrum reflectance spectrophotometer at each follow-up.
RESULTS: After 3 times of treatment, there was statistically significant difference between the IGA score in week 8 and before treatment on both sides(Z=2.64, P < 0.01; Z=2.67, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in IGA score between the treatment side and the control side before treatment and in week 8 (P=0.59, P=0.26). There was statistically significant difference between the investiga-tor' s subjective erythema score in week 8 and before treatment on the treatment side(Z=4.24, P < 0.01), while no significant difference was showed on the control side(Z=1.73, P=0.08). In week 8, the investigator's subjective erythema score of the treatment side was lower than that of the control side (Z=3.61, P < 0.01). The erythema index of the treatment side was significantly decreased at 5 time points (P < 0.01), and the index decreased significantly in week 8 compared with the index before treatment (P < 0.01), while the erythema index of the control side was not significantly different at 5 time points. The treatment related adverse events included erythema and edema after treatment and pain during treatment, the severity was mild to moderate, which resolved spontaneously within 1 to 3 days. Nine patients were very satisfied with the treatment, 7 patients were satisfied, and 6 patients considered average.
CONCLUSION: 585 nm Q-switched laser has some effect in the treatment of postinflammatory erythema, and it ensures good tolerance and safety. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment side and the control side on the improvement of acne inflammatory lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  585 nm Q-switched laser; Acne; Postinflammatory erythema

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35435193      PMCID: PMC9069050     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  15 in total

1.  Experimental study on the vascular thermal response to visible laser pulses.

Authors:  D Li; B Chen; W J Wu; G X Wang; Y L He; Z X Ying
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Topical timolol for postacne erythema.

Authors:  T P Afra; Muhammed Razmi T; Dipankar De
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency Treatment for Acne-related Post-inflammatory Erythema.

Authors:  Seonguk Min; Seon Yong Park; Ji Young Yoon; Hyuck Hoon Kwon; Dae Hun Suh
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.437

Review 4.  Nonvascular uses of pulsed dye laser in clinical dermatology.

Authors:  Emily Forbat; Firas Al-Niaimi
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Intense pulsed light vs. pulsed-dye laser in the treatment of facial acne: a randomized split-face trial.

Authors:  Y S Choi; H S Suh; M Y Yoon; S U Min; D H Lee; D H Suh
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  Low-fluence 585 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser: a novel laser treatment for post-acne erythema.

Authors:  Ratchathorn Panchaprateep; Girish Munavalli
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Comparison of fractional, nonablative, 1550-nm laser and 595-nm pulsed dye laser for the treatment of facial erythema resulting from acne: a split-face, evaluator-blinded, randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Kui Young Park; Eun Jung Ko; Seong Jun Seo; Chang Kwun Hong
Journal:  J Cosmet Laser Ther       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.247

8.  Pulsed-dye laser treatment for inflammatory acne vulgaris: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  E D Seaton; A Charakida; P E Mouser; I Grace; R M Clement; A C Chu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The comparative study of efficacy between 1064-nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser and 595-nm pulsed dye laser for the treatment of acne vulgaris.

Authors:  Napith Chalermsuwiwattanakan; Salinee Rojhirunsakool; Nanticha Kamanamool; Silada Kanokrungsee; Montree Udompataikul
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.696

10.  Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Acne-induced Post-inflammatory Erythema.

Authors:  Minu L Mathew; R Karthik; M Mallikarjun; Soumya Bhute; Aiswarya Varghese
Journal:  Indian Dermatol Online J       Date:  2018 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.