Literature DB >> 35435185

[Effects of 275 nm and 310 nm ultraviolet irradiation on bone metabolism in ovariectomized osteoporotic rats].

W He1, S W Yang1, J Chen1, X J Zhu2, Z Z Chen3, W J Ma1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of 275 nm and 310 nm ultraviolet irradiation on ovariectomized rats' bone metabolism.
METHODS: Twenty four 3-month-old female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rat were randomly divided into control group, sham operated group, 275 nm ultraviolet (UV) irradiation group and 310 nm UV irradiation group. Each group contained 6 rats. The rats in the two irradiation groups were treated with bilateral ovariectomy. The rats in sham operated group received sham operation (They were given the same back incision and a bit of par-ovarian fat were removed). Control group received no disposition. About 24 weeks after operation, all the rats received detailed bone mineral density (BMD) detection again. Detection regions include cervical vertebra, lumbar vertebra, proximal femur, mid femur and distal femur. Next, osteopenia rats in 275 nm irradiation group were UV irradiated 275 nm with fixed illumination intensity (15 μW/cm2) everyday for 16 weeks. The osteopenia rats in 310 nm irradiation group were UV irradiated 310 nm with fixed illumination intensity (15 μW/cm2) everyday for 16 weeks. The backs of the rats were shaved regularly as irradiation area (6 cm×8 cm). After 16-week irradiation, all the rats' BMD of cervical vertebra, lumbar vertebra, proximal femur, mid femur and distal femur were measured. At the end of the trial, all the rats' blood specimens were obtained and serum 25(OH)D, procollagen type Ⅰ N-peptide (PINP) and osteocalcin (OC) were measured.
RESULTS: Compared with control group [(238.78±26.74) mg/cm3], the BMD of the whole body were significantly lower in 275 nm [(193.34±13.28) mg/cm3] and 310 nm [(191.19±18.48) mg/cm3] irradiation groups (P=0.002, P=0.001). There were no significant difference between sham operated group [(227.20±14.32) mg/cm3] and control group. After 16-week ultraviolet irradiation, the BMD of the whole body were significantly increased in 275 nm [(193.34±13.28) mg/cm3 vs. (221.68±25.52) mg/cm3, P=0.005] and 310 nm groups [(191.19±18.48) mg/cm3 vs. (267.48±20.54) mg/cm3, P < 0.001] after corresponding irradiation. The BMD of the four body regions (lumbar vertebra, proximal femur, mid femur and distal femur) had significantly increased after irradiation in 275 nm irradiation group. For 310 nm irradiation group, the BMD in cervical vertebra, lumbar vertebra, proximal femur, mid femur and distal femur also had increased significantly after 310 nm ultraviolet irradiation. The concentration of serum 25(OH)D and OC was higher in 275 nm irradiation group than in control group [(46.78±5.59) μg/L vs. (21.32±6.65) μg/L, P=0.002;(2.05±0.53) U/L vs. (1.32±0.07) U/L, P=0.022]. Compared with the control, the concentration of serum 25(OH)D [(58.05±12.74) μg/L], OC [(2.04±0.53) U/L] and PINP [(176.16±24.18) U/L] was significantly higher (P < 0.001, P=0.015, P=0.005) in 310 nm irradiation group. However, there were no significantly difference between sham operated group and the control.
CONCLUSION: Both 275 nm and 310 nm ultraviolet could improve rats' vitamin D synthesis. Both 275 nm and 310 nm ultraviolet could improve osteopenia rats' bone condition. The irradiation of 310 nm might be more effective on bone condition improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone metabolism; Ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats; Ultraviolet; Vitamin D

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35435185      PMCID: PMC9069042     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  13 in total

Review 1.  Consequences of long-term hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  D W Purdie
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 2.  Vitamin D deficiency.

Authors:  Michael F Holick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Biology and Mechanisms of Action of the Vitamin D Hormone.

Authors:  J Wesley Pike; Sylvia Christakos
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 4.  Vitamin D for skeletal and non-skeletal health: What we should know.

Authors:  Nipith Charoenngam; Arash Shirvani; Michael F Holick
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-07-13

5.  Weight-based hypoglycaemia treatment protocol for adults with Type 1 diabetes: a randomized crossover clinical trial.

Authors:  L McTavish; J D Krebs; M Weatherall; E Wiltshire
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 6.  Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of osteoporotic fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karn Wijarnpreecha; Charat Thongprayoon; Panadeekarn Panjawatanan; Patompong Ungprasert
Journal:  J Evid Based Med       Date:  2018-01-11

7.  The effect of short-term low-energy ultraviolet B irradiation on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized single-blinded controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Ivan Micić; In-Ho Jeon; So-Hyun Park; Seo-Sung Hwa; Jae-Myeung Chun; Predrag Stojiljković
Journal:  Srp Arh Celok Lek       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.207

8.  [Comparison of ultraviolet A and ultraviolet B on 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3 and bone metabolism in ovariectomized rats].

Authors:  Zi-ze Zhuo; Ling Liu; Wen-jun Ma; Qian Zhao; Xin Zhao; Yong-zhi Wang; Guo-yi Zhang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2013-06-18

9.  Rickettsia africae infection in man after travel to Ethiopia.

Authors:  Dorothea Stephany; Pierre Buffet; Jean-Marc Rolain; Didier Raoult; Paul H Consigny
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 10.  PINP as a biological response marker during teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis.

Authors:  J H Krege; N E Lane; J M Harris; P D Miller
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.