| Literature DB >> 35434517 |
Franny Hulscher1, Benjamin Mine1, Stéphanie Elens1, Thomas Bonnet1, Juan Vazquez Suarez1, Boris Lubicz1.
Abstract
Purpose: Non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is an emergency usually caused by the rupture of a saccular intracranial aneurysm. Endovascular treatment (EVT) is now considered as the first therapeutic option. The aim of our study is to evaluate, over a 14-year period in a single center, the result of EVT of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.Entities:
Keywords: SAH; endovascular treatment; intracranial aneurysm; neurointerventional; ruptured aneurysm
Year: 2022 PMID: 35434517 PMCID: PMC8973758 DOI: 10.5334/jbsr.2550
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Belg Soc Radiol ISSN: 2514-8281 Impact factor: 1.894
Patient characteristics (n = 457). Abbreviations as in the text.
|
| |
|---|---|
| AGE | 52 ± 14.2 (SD) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Male | 169 (37%) |
|
| |
| Female | 288 (63%) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Grade 1 | 231 (50.6%) |
|
| |
| Grade 2 | 75 (16.4%) |
|
| |
| Grade 3 | 8 (1.8%) |
|
| |
| Grade 4 | 81 (17.7%) |
|
| |
| Grade 5 | 62 (13.6%) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Yes | 192 (42%) |
|
| |
| No | 255 (58%) |
|
| |
Imaging characteristics (n = 457). Abbreviations as in the text.
|
| |
|---|---|
| ORIGIN OF SAH (N = 457) | |
|
| |
| Saccular aneurysm | 414 (90.6%) |
|
| |
| Fusiform aneurysm | 10 (2.2%) |
|
| |
| Dissecting aneurysm | 33 (7.2%) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Anterior communicating complex (ACom) | 189 (41.4%) |
|
| |
| Middle cerebral artery (MCA) | 65 (14.3%) |
|
| |
| Posterior communicating artery (PCom) | 79 (17.3%) |
|
| |
| Internal carotid artery (ICA) | 38 (8.4%) |
|
| |
| Pericallosal artery | 4 (1.8%) |
|
| |
| Basilar artery tip | 28 (6.1%) |
|
| |
| Posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) | 17 (3.8%) |
|
| |
| Vertebral artery | 14 (3.1%) |
|
| |
| Others | 23 (5%) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Small (<10 mm) | 352 (83%) |
|
| |
| Large (10 to 25 mm) | 70 (16.5%) |
|
| |
| Giant (>25 mm) | 8 (1.9%) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| None | 321 (70.2%) |
|
| |
| Cerebral arteriovenous malformation | 10 (2.2%) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Dissection | 5 (1.1%) |
|
| |
| Carotid stenosis | 3 (0.7%) |
|
| |
| Vasospasm | 13 (2.8%) |
|
| |
| Carotid thrombosis | 1 (0.2%) |
|
| |
| Major decreased cerebral perfusion | 2 (0.4%) |
|
| |
|
| Median = 1 ; 95% CI [ |
|
| |
a Dissection (n = 33) size was not measured.
b Maximal diameter.
c Before EVT.
Post-procedural events (n = 246).
|
| |
|
| 166 (67.5%) |
|
| |
|
| 54 (22%) |
|
| |
|
| 38 (15.5%) |
|
| |
|
| 37 (15%) |
|
| |
|
| 23 (9.4%) |
|
| |
| Stroke | 12 (4.9%) |
|
| |
| Septic shock | 11 (4.5%) |
|
| |
| Terson syndrome | 9 (3.7%) |
|
| |
| Status epilepticus | 9 (3.7%) |
|
| |
| Cardiogenic shock | 5 (2%) |
|
| |
| EVD related hemorrhage | 5 (2%) |
|
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | 4 (1.6%) |
|
| |
| Digestive ischemia | 3 (1.2%) |
|
| |
| Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) | 2 (0.8%) |
|
| |
| Meningitis | 2 (0.8%) |
|
| |
| Aneurysm rebleeding | 2 (0.8%) |
|
| |
| Transient ischemic attack | 1 (0.4%) |
|
| |
| Myocardial infarction | 1 (0.4%) |
|
| |
| Cardiorespiratory arrest | 1 (0.4%) |
|
| |
| Intra-stent stenosis | 1 (0.4%) |
|
| |
mRS according to initial WFNS. Abbreviations as in the text.
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| WFNS | MRS | N | % |
|
| |||
|
| 0 = No symptoms at all | 154 | 66.7 |
|
| |||
| 1 = No significant disability despite symptoms | 35 | 15.2 | |
|
| |||
| 2 = Slight disability | 19 | 8.2 | |
|
| |||
| 3 = Moderate disability | 6 | 2.6 | |
|
| |||
| 4 = Moderate severe disability | 2 | 0.9 | |
|
| |||
| 5 = Severe disability | 1 | 0.4 | |
|
| |||
| 6 = Dead | 14 | 6.1 | |
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
| 0 = No symptoms at all | 27 | 36.0 |
|
| |||
| 1 = No significant disability despite symptoms | 20 | 26.7 | |
|
| |||
| 2 = Slight disability | 7 | 9.3 | |
|
| |||
| 3 = Moderate disability | 5 | 6.7 | |
|
| |||
| 4 = Moderate severe disability | 2 | 2.7 | |
|
| |||
| 5 = Severe disability | 2 | 2.7 | |
|
| |||
| 6 = Dead | 12 | 16.0 | |
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
| 0 = No symptoms at all | 0 | 0 |
|
| |||
| 1 = No significant disability despite symptoms | 3 | 37.5 | |
|
| |||
| 2 = Slight disability | 2 | 25 | |
|
| |||
| 3 = Moderate disability | 2 | 25 | |
|
| |||
| 4 = Moderate severe disability | 1 | 12.5 | |
|
| |||
| 5 = Severe disability | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||
| 6 = Dead | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
| 0 = No symptoms at all | 10 | 12 |
|
| |||
| 1 = No significant disability despite symptoms | 20 | 25 | |
|
| |||
| 2 = Slight disability | 14 | 17 | |
|
| |||
| 3 = Moderate disability | 7 | 9 | |
|
| |||
| 4 = Moderate severe disability | 3 | 4 | |
|
| |||
| 5 = Severe disability | 1 | 1 | |
|
| |||
| 6 = Dead | 26 | 32 | |
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
| 0 = No symptoms at all | 2 | 3 |
|
| |||
| 1 = No significant disability despite symptoms | 7 | 11 | |
|
| |||
| 2 = Slight disability | 5 | 8 | |
|
| |||
| 3 = Moderate disability | 6 | 10 | |
|
| |||
| 4 = Moderate severe disability | 10 | 16 | |
|
| |||
| 5 = Severe disability | 3 | 5 | |
|
| |||
| 6 = Dead | 29 | 47 | |
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVT FAILURES | ||||
|
| ||||
| PATIENT GENDER/AGE | WFNS BEFORE EVT | EVD | ANEURYSM CHARACTERISTICS | REASON OF THE EVT FAILURE |
|
| ||||
|
| 2 | No | PICA, small | Unreachable |
|
| ||||
|
| 2 | Yes | ACom, large | Risk of vascular occlusion |
|
| ||||
|
| 4 | Yes | ACom, small | Carotid stenosis |
|
| ||||
|
| 1 | Yes | ACom, small | Coil instability |
|
| ||||
|
| 2 | Yes | PICA, small | Risk of vascular occlusion |
|
| ||||
|
| 5 | Yes | ACom, small | Risk of vascular occlusion |
|
| ||||
|
| 1 | Yes | PCom, large | Coil instability |
|
| ||||
|
| 2 | Yes | ACom, small | Carotid stenosis |
|
| ||||
|
| 1 | Yes | ACom, large | Coil instability |
|
| ||||
|
| 1 | Yes | MCA, small | Coil instability |
|
| ||||
|
| 1 | No | PCom, small | Too small aneurysm size |
|
| ||||