Literature DB >> 35434517

Endovascular Treatment of Patients with Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Series of 468 Patients Treated Over a 14-Year Period.

Franny Hulscher1, Benjamin Mine1, Stéphanie Elens1, Thomas Bonnet1, Juan Vazquez Suarez1, Boris Lubicz1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is an emergency usually caused by the rupture of a saccular intracranial aneurysm. Endovascular treatment (EVT) is now considered as the first therapeutic option. The aim of our study is to evaluate, over a 14-year period in a single center, the result of EVT of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Methods: From the retrospective analysis of our prospectively maintained database, we collected data of 457 patients successfully treated by endovascular approach for a SAH. Descriptive statistics and percentages were used to report clinical and anatomical outcomes, procedure-related complications, post procedural events, morbidity and mortality.
Results: EVT was unsuccessful in eleven patients but effective in 457 patients with two patients who experienced a rebleeding (0.4%). In 6.3% of cases, a second EVT was necessary. The final aneurysm occlusion was complete (65.7%), with a neck remnant (28.2%) or incomplete (6.1%). Procedure-related complications occurred in 5.9% of patients and were associated with five clinical worsening and one death. Overall EVT-related morbidity and mortality were thus of 1.3% and 0.4% respectively. At discharge, 71% of patients had a good recovery (mRS 0-2), 11.2% had a poor outcome (mRS 3-5), and 17.8% died.
Conclusion: This study seems to prove that high-volume centers with experienced interventional neuroradiologists carry low rates of technical failure and complication from EVT of ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  SAH; endovascular treatment; intracranial aneurysm; neurointerventional; ruptured aneurysm

Year:  2022        PMID: 35434517      PMCID: PMC8973758          DOI: 10.5334/jbsr.2550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol        ISSN: 2514-8281            Impact factor:   1.894


Introduction

Non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a major life-threatening emergency. In 80% of cases, it is caused by the rupture of a saccular intracranial aneurysm (sIA). Other common causes are dissecting aneurysms, cerebral arteriovenous malformations and vasculitis [123]. The hallmark symptom is a sudden and severe headache. Associated signs include nausea, vomiting, photophobia, neck stiffness, focal neurologic deficits, seizure or depressed consciousness [124]. The initial clinical severity is determined by simple validated grading system like the World federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) that is the most used indicators and considered as a major determinant of the prognosis [45]. SAH may cause acute hydrocephalus and brain edema. Later complications include vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia that are associated with serious damages even after the aneurysm treatment [125]. Aneurysmal SAH are most often treated within 24 – 72 hours [345]. Neurosurgical clipping and endovascular treatment (EVT) by endosaccular coiling are both effective for the treatment of saccular intracranial aneurysms. These treatments have been compared and EVT is now considered as the first therapeutic option in most cases. Treatment choice is made by a multidisciplinary team including interventional neuroradiologists (INR), neurosurgeons, intensivists, and neurologists [3456789]. The aim of our study is to evaluate, over a 14-year period in a single high-volume center, the results of EVT of ruptured intracranial aneurysm.

Patients & Methods

Study design and patients

This study was approved by our institutional ethical committee (n°P2019/152). Our prospectively maintained database was retrospectively analyzed to identify, between April 2004 and June 2018, all patients treated only by endovascular approach for a ruptured IA.

Collected data

Available data were collected from the admission date in different institutions to collect the first bleeding time. The outcomes of our patients were followed until they were discharged from our hospital, or another medical institution and no clinical results were collected beyond three months of follow-up after EVT.

Endovascular procedure and external ventricular drain

All EVT were performed by an INR from our institution. As it is reflected in , the majority of patients were treated within the first days following the SAH (median = day 1 and interquartile range = 2 days). Percentage of patients treated according to the day following the SAH. Placement of an external ventricular drainage (EVD) was decided by our neurovascular team. Patients were then monitored in our intensive care unit until the overall stabilization of their condition.

Statistical analysis

The sample was analyzed by descriptive statistics. Quantitative data were expressed in mean values ± standard deviation (SD) or medians and 95% confidence intervals (CI) or interquartile range, accordingly, after verification of normality of distributions by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Qualitative data were expressed by the way of percentages.

Patient characteristics

Four hundred sixty-eight patients were identified. In eleven patients, there was a failure of EVT (2.4%). These patients were excluded from the present analysis and are detailed in Appendix. Our final cohort includes 457 patients successfully treated by endovascular approach. Patient characteristics are detailed in . Patient characteristics (n = 457). Abbreviations as in the text. Imaging characteristics of 457 patients successfully treated by endovascular approach are detailed in . Imaging characteristics (n = 457). Abbreviations as in the text. a Dissection (n = 33) size was not measured. b Maximal diameter. c Before EVT.

Results

Procedures

shows the endovascular technique used for EVT. In 6.3% of the cases (n = 29/457), a second EVT was necessary to completely exclude the aneurysm or the arterial dissection. shows the second endovascular method. Percentage of endovascular technique used for intial treatment of the SAH. Percentage of endovascular method when a second treatment was necessary.

Anatomical outcome

Regarding aneurysm or arterial dissection occlusion, EVT achieved a complete occlusion in 65.7% of the cases. There was a neck remnant in 28.2% and an incomplete occlusion in 6.1% of the cases.

Procedure related complications and clinical outcomes

Procedure-related complications occurred in 27 cases (5.9%) in 26 patients. Complications included 9 thromboembolic events (2%), 6 aneurysm perforations (1.3%), 5 vasospasms (1.1%), 2 coil migrations (0.4%), 4 arterial dissections (0.9%), one WEB device migration (0.2%). These complications were associated with clinical consequences in 6 patients with 5 worsening of neurological exam and 1 death. Immediate EVT-related morbidity and mortality were thus 1.1% and 0.2% respectively.

Immediate post-procedural Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS)

Immediate clinical outcomes were collected within 24 hours after EVT and are detailed in . Percentage of immediate GOS after EVT.

Post-procedural events

Clinical complications occurred in 246/457 (53.8%) patients. These events are detailed in . Post-procedural events (n = 246). Aneurysm rebleeding occurred in 2/457 patients (0.4%): - A 34-year-old woman with a WFNS grade 3 and a large MCA sIA was treated by coiling on the 8th day after SAH. A vasospasm was identified before EVT and the occlusion of the sIA was incomplete. The next day, a rebleeding occurred and an EVD was needed with a second EVT by stenting and coiling. The patient kept a moderate disability at discharge and a neck remnant regarding the occlusion of the sIA - A 66-year-old man with a WFNS grade 4 and a posterior cerebral artery dissection was treated by stenting on the 2nd day after SAH. The patient presented then a major vasospasm and hydrocephalus that had worsened his clinical situation. The rebleeding occurred ten days after the EVT and left him in a brain-dead state. Overall EVT-related morbidity and mortality were thus 1.3% and 0.4% respectively. There were 37 ventriculitis and 2 meningitis among 192 EVDs placed. Overall EVD-related infections were thus 20.3%.

Clinical outcomes at discharge

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge is shown in . Percentage of mRS at discharge. shows the comparison between GOS immediately after EVT (darker gray, see ) and GOS at discharge (lighter grey). Comparison between percentage of GOS immediately after EVT (darker gray) and at discharge (lighter grey). The report of the clinical results (mRS) at discharge according to the initial WFNS grade is detailed in . mRS according to initial WFNS. Abbreviations as in the text.

Discussion

Patients and imaging characteristics

Our WFNS grades correspond to the ARETA trial and the CLARITY studies and show a similar population with most patients with a favorable grade at admission [1011]. In this study, the proportion of saccular intracranial aneurysms (90.6%) and arterial dissection (7.2%) is probably higher because we have excluded etiologies that did not require an EVT. The most common sites of ruptured aneurysms are the ACom, the Pcom and the MCA with often unique aneurysm which are in line with our results. The median size of ruptured aneurysms is around 6 mm and most of intracaranial aneurysms are smaller than 1 cm (around 80–90% of cases) like in our study which highlights the rupture risk even with small aneurysms [2679101114151617].

EVT procedure and anatomical outcome

Our results show high use of intracranial stents and vascular occlusion. It can be explained by several factors: (1) a high percentage (9.4%) of dissections and fusiform aneurysms; (2) stents are more often used for larger aneurysms (18.4% in our study) and/or wide neck aneurysms (although neck size was not measured in our data). Occlusion rates reported in our series were like the CLARITY and Park et al. studies [69101618192021].

Procedure-related complications and clinical outcomes

In our study, the rates of intraoperative complications, EVT-related morbidity and mortality are lower than in the literature [192122]. Regarding thromboembolic events (2% in our study), the range in the literature is between 2.5% and 28.0% [19212223]. Good results can possibly be explained by the use of a strict heparinization protocol, the same as for unruptured aneurysms. The aim is to double the activated clotting time (ACT) during EVT, and to control it every 30 minutes. Heparinization is then prolonged for 12-24h in most patients. Some studies showed comparable good results using continuous heparin for 24h without a significant increase of hemorrhagic complications [2224]. The rate of intraoperative rupture in our study was 1.3% which is lower to the reported rates found in literature (4.4–7.6%) [192123]. Practitioner experience and centers with high number of patients have lower complication rate and improve outcomes from SAH which could also explain our good results. Indeed, in our center, around 250 IA are yearly treated, most of them being unruptured and referred by other centers [413192122]. In our series, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) occurred in 166 patients (36.3%) and was the most frequent complication. Our results are thus in accordance with the literature. The incidence of acute re-rupture after coiling embolization of ruptured saccular intracranial aneurysms is between 1.0% to 3.6% [2125]. Dissecting aneurysms have different etiological and anatomical characteristics. The recurrence of SAH is not uncommon with a rate of 40% specifically for patient treated conservatively [162125]. In the present series, two patients suffered from an early rebleeding. One was a saccular intracranial aneurysm with an acute re-rupture probably due to an incomplete occlusion during the first EVT. The second is a dissection treated by stenting. Our results compare favorably with the literature (0.4%). The ISAT study showed 74.6% of modified Rankin Scales (mRS) between 0 – 2 and 25.4% of mRS between 3 – 6 which are like our results even if we have more patients without any symptom (42%) and more fatalities (17.8%) compared to ISAT (20% and 7.5% respectively) [78]. As illustrated in , a significant proportion of patients at discharge are in a worse clinical condition than immediately after EVT. Post-procedural events like DCI, intracranial hypertension or epileptic seizure may explain this worsening.

Limitations

Our monocentric retrospective study has several limitations despite the fact that our database was prospectively maintained. Some data could have been collected to provide interesting information such as the aneurysm neck size, patient risk factors, the severity of the bleeding on CT scan, the detailed presentation of SAH. On the other hand, mid- and long-term results were not evaluated in the present study. Aneurysm recanalization and late rebleeding are significant issues and could be part of a complementary study to evaluate long-term results of EVT of ruptured IA [5121725]. Finally, data concerning patients treated by surgical clipping were not evaluated.

Conclusion

This study shows that EVT is safe and effective for patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms, especially when high practitioner experience and high-volume centers are available. However, even if SAH management has improved over the years, associated complications still lead to significant neurological impairment in some patients. Further research on these topics is mandatory to improve the clinical course of these patients.
Table 1

Patient characteristics (n = 457). Abbreviations as in the text.


AGE (YEARS)52 ± 14.2 (SD)

Gender

    Male169 (37%)

    Female288 (63%)

WFNS (before the first procedure)

    Grade 1231 (50.6%)

    Grade 275 (16.4%)

    Grade 38 (1.8%)

    Grade 481 (17.7%)

    Grade 562 (13.6%)

EVD

    Yes192 (42%)

    No255 (58%)

Table 2

Imaging characteristics (n = 457). Abbreviations as in the text.


ORIGIN OF SAH (N = 457)

    Saccular aneurysm414 (90.6%)

    Fusiform aneurysm10 (2.2%)

    Dissecting aneurysm33 (7.2%)

Location

    Anterior communicating complex (ACom)189 (41.4%)

    Middle cerebral artery (MCA)65 (14.3%)

    Posterior communicating artery (PCom)79 (17.3%)

    Internal carotid artery (ICA)38 (8.4%)

    Pericallosal artery4 (1.8%)

    Basilar artery tip28 (6.1%)

    Posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA)17 (3.8%)

    Vertebral artery14 (3.1%)

    Others23 (5%)

Size range of aneurysm a b (n = 424)

    Small (<10 mm)352 (83%)

    Large (10 to 25 mm)70 (16.5%)

    Giant (>25 mm)8 (1.9%)

Associated lesion c (n = 457)

    None321 (70.2%)

    Cerebral arteriovenous malformation10 (2.2%)

Other aneurysm 113 (24.7%)

    Dissection5 (1.1%)

    Carotid stenosis3 (0.7%)

    Vasospasm13 (2.8%)

    Carotid thrombosis1 (0.2%)

    Major decreased cerebral perfusion2 (0.4%)

Number of associated aneurysms Median = 1 ; 95% CI [123]

a Dissection (n = 33) size was not measured.

b Maximal diameter.

c Before EVT.

Table 3

Post-procedural events (n = 246).


Vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) 166 (67.5%)

Intracranial hypertension 54 (22%)

Epileptic seizure 38 (15.5%)

Ventriculitis 37 (15%)

Hydrocephalus 23 (9.4%)

Stroke12 (4.9%)

Septic shock11 (4.5%)

Terson syndrome9 (3.7%)

Status epilepticus9 (3.7%)

Cardiogenic shock5 (2%)

EVD related hemorrhage5 (2%)

Pulmonary embolism4 (1.6%)

Digestive ischemia3 (1.2%)

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)2 (0.8%)

Meningitis2 (0.8%)

Aneurysm rebleeding2 (0.8%)

Transient ischemic attack1 (0.4%)

Myocardial infarction1 (0.4%)

Cardiorespiratory arrest1 (0.4%)

Intra-stent stenosis1 (0.4%)

Table 4

mRS according to initial WFNS. Abbreviations as in the text.


WFNSMRSN%

grade 1 0 = No symptoms at all15466.7

1 = No significant disability despite symptoms3515.2

2 = Slight disability198.2

3 = Moderate disability62.6

4 = Moderate severe disability20.9

5 = Severe disability10.4

6 = Dead146.1

Total 231 100

grade 2 0 = No symptoms at all2736.0

1 = No significant disability despite symptoms2026.7

2 = Slight disability79.3

3 = Moderate disability56.7

4 = Moderate severe disability22.7

5 = Severe disability22.7

6 = Dead1216.0

Total 75 100

grade 3 0 = No symptoms at all00

1 = No significant disability despite symptoms337.5

2 = Slight disability225

3 = Moderate disability225

4 = Moderate severe disability112.5

5 = Severe disability00

6 = Dead00

Total 8 100

grade 4 0 = No symptoms at all1012

1 = No significant disability despite symptoms2025

2 = Slight disability1417

3 = Moderate disability79

4 = Moderate severe disability34

5 = Severe disability11

6 = Dead2632

Total 81 100

grade 5 0 = No symptoms at all23

1 = No significant disability despite symptoms711

2 = Slight disability58

3 = Moderate disability610

4 = Moderate severe disability1016

5 = Severe disability35

6 = Dead2947

Total 62 100


EVT FAILURES

PATIENT GENDER/AGEWFNS BEFORE EVTEVDANEURYSM CHARACTERISTICSREASON OF THE EVT FAILURE

F/36 2NoPICA, smallUnreachable

M/57 2YesACom, largeRisk of vascular occlusion

M/78 4YesACom, smallCarotid stenosis

F/56 1YesACom, smallCoil instability

F/54 2YesPICA, smallRisk of vascular occlusion

F/43 5YesACom, smallRisk of vascular occlusion

F/84 1YesPCom, largeCoil instability

F/74 2YesACom, smallCarotid stenosis

F/50 1YesACom, largeCoil instability

M/56 1YesMCA, smallCoil instability

M/53 1NoPCom, smallToo small aneurysm size

  25 in total

1.  Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: factors affecting the rate and outcome of endovascular treatment complications in a series of 782 patients (CLARITY study).

Authors:  Laurent Pierot; Christophe Cognard; René Anxionnat; Frédéric Ricolfi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  External ventricular drainage for intraventricular hemorrhage.

Authors:  Mahua Dey; Jennifer Jaffe; Agnieszka Stadnik; Issam A Awad
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 3.  Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Michael T Lawton; G Edward Vates
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/american Stroke Association.

Authors:  E Sander Connolly; Alejandro A Rabinstein; J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Colin P Derdeyn; Jacques Dion; Randall T Higashida; Brian L Hoh; Catherine J Kirkness; Andrew M Naidech; Christopher S Ogilvy; Aman B Patel; B Gregory Thompson; Paul Vespa
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  External ventricular drainage following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  Paul Gigante; Brian Y Hwang; Geoffrey Appelboom; Christopher P Kellner; Michael A Kellner; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 1.596

6.  Safety of intravenous heparin administration after endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  A Z Vance; M V Jayaraman; G J Dubel; C E Doberstein; R A Haas
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 5.836

7.  Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms as the first thérapeutic option.

Authors:  B Lubicz; D Balériaux; F Lefranc; J Brotchi; M Bruneau; M Levivier
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 3.447

Review 8.  Endovascular treatment of aneurisms: pre, intra and post operative management.

Authors:  S Bracard; C Barbier; A L Derelle; R Anxionnat
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Analysis of recanalization after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysm (ARETA trial): presentation of a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Azzedine Benaissa; Coralie Barbe; Laurent Pierot
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.447

10.  Detachable coil embolisation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single center study, a decade experience.

Authors:  S A Renowden; V Benes; M Bradley; A J Molyneux
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 1.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.