| Literature DB >> 35434416 |
Alejandra Paola Magnoli1,2, Julián Parada1,2, Fátima Candelaria de la Torre1, Santiago Watson1, Valeria Poloni2,3, Analía Fochesato3, María Pía Martínez3, María Valeria Coniglio1, María Eugenia Ortiz1, Lilia Cavaglieri2,3.
Abstract
The objective was to evaluate the effect of two probiotic yeast strains (Saccharomyces. cerevisiae RC016 and Kluyveromyces marxianus VM004) as a substitute of growth promoter antibiotics on health status and productive parameters in weaned piglets. Commercial line hybrid piglets (Choice n=200), weaned at 21 d age were allotted by sex, and assigned in 4 pens per treatment (2 pens males and 2 pens females), 10 pigs per pen divided into 2 blocks (with or without antibiotics). Dietary treatments included a basal diet (BD) supplemented with probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae RC016 and Kluyveromyces marxianus VM004 (100 g, 1 × 1010 CFU/g, respectively), with or without antibiotics, mixed per ton of growth phases diets. Pigs were fed ad libitum with treatments T1) BD with antibiotics (BD); T2) BD with antibiotics + Saccharomyces cerevisiae; T3) BD without antibiotics + Saccharomyces cerevisiae; T4) BD with antibiotics + Kluyveromyces marxianus; T5) BD without antibiotics + Kluyveromyces marxianus. The effects on respiratory tract clinometry, carcass quality, organs weight, blood haematology and productive parameters were evaluated. When clinical signs occurred (diarrhoea, stomach ulcers, respiratory signs), they decreased with both probiotics addition, mainly Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The productive parameters promotion by both probiotics was similar than that using antibiotics. The probiotics inclusion increased the carcass weight and significantly reduced the lumbar fat thickness (P ≤ 0.05). Supplementation with both probiotics demonstrated their ability to substitute the antibiotics use on clinometry, carcass quality and on the productive parameters promotion of weaned piglets.Entities:
Keywords: Direct-fed microbials; Growth promoter antibiotics; Health promotion; Pigs; Productive parameters
Year: 2022 PMID: 35434416 PMCID: PMC9006636 DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2022.100246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Anim Sci ISSN: 2451-943X
Composition of the basal diet for the three phases, as fed-basis
| Unit | Phase 1(21 to 32 days of age) | Phase 2(33 to 42 days of age) | Phase 3(43 to 56 days of age) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredients | ||||
| Corn (ground) | Kg | 470.5 | 493.5 | 560.5 |
| Soybean meal (47% CP) | Kg | 255 | 368 | 350 |
| Soybean oil | Kg | 24 | 36 | 37 |
| Dextrose plus | Kg | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Starter concentrate | Kg | 250 | ||
| Growing concentrate (NF4) | Kg | 100 | ||
| Growing concentrate (NF5) | Kg | 50 | ||
| Calculated nutrient content | ||||
| Dry Matter | % | 92.0074 | 90.6097 | 88.8411 |
| C P | % | 22.7043 | 22.2336 | 19.8668 |
| ME | Kcal | 3,676.6047 | 3,595.3111 | 3,429.3360 |
| Total Lysine | % | 1.6645 | 1.6005 | 1.4165 |
| Dig Lysine | % | 1.5500 | 1.5000 | 1.3123 |
| Dig Methionine | % | 0.6105 | 0.6122 | 0.5481 |
| Dig Cysteine | % | 0.3281 | 0.2928 | 0.2500 |
| Dig Met + Cyst | % | 0.9300 | 0.9000 | 0.8771 |
| Dig Tryptophan | % | 0.3565 | 0.3450 | 0.2429 |
| Dig Threonine | % | 1.0075 | 0.9750 | 0.8373 |
| Dig Arginine | % | 1.1428 | 1.1900 | |
| Dig Valine | % | 0.6391 | 0.7395 | |
| Crude fat | % | 9.1526 | 8.3909 | 4.9587 |
| Crude fibre | % | 1.9073 | 2.3984 | 3.4877 |
| Calcium | % | 0.8575 | 0.8500 | 0.6679 |
| Total Phosphorus | % | 0.5934 | 0.5710 | 0.6504 |
| Available Phosphorus | % | 0.5663 | 0.5046 | 0.4362 |
| Lactose | % | 15.0000 | 7.5000 | |
| Linoleic Acid (C18:2) | % | 2.7068 | 3.0688 | 2.4500 |
| Choline | µg/g | 735.0000 | 735.0000 | 593.2238 |
| Zinc | µg/g | 3,000.0000 | 3,000.0000 | 1,639.1250 |
| Copper | µg/g | 266.2000 | 266.2000 | 263.5000 |
| Selenium | µg/g | 0.4050 | 0.4050 | 0.3375 |
| Iron | µg/g | 90.3900 | 90.3900 | 75.4750 |
| Sodium | % | 0.4605 | 0.3402 | 0.2196 |
| Chlorine | % | 0.5061 | 0.3733 | 0.3000 |
| Ash | % | 5.9760 | 5.7318 | 4.6212 |
| Aflatoxin B1 | ng/g | 27.61 | 20.97 | 310.07 |
CP=Crude Protein; ME=metabolizable energy.
Provided the following per kilogram of diet: 12,000 IU vitamin A as vitamin A acetate; 2,500 IU vitamin D3; 30 IU vitamin E as DL-α-tocopheryl acetate; 12 μg vitamin B12; 3 mg vitamin K as menadione sodium bisulphate; 15 mg D-pantothenic acid as calcium pantothenate; 40 mg nicotinic acid; 400 mg choline as choline chloride; 30 mg Mn as manganese oxide, 80 mg Zn as zinc oxide, 90 mg Fe as iron sulphate, 10 mg Cu as copper sulphate; 0.35 mg as ethylenediamine dihydroiodide and 0.3 mg Se: as sodium selenite.
Based on NRC (2012) values.
Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RC016 and Kluyveromyces marxianus VM004 probiotic supplementation on productive parameters at the end of the experimental period
| T | A | Sex | TWG (Kg)(mean ± SD) | DWG (Kg) (mean ± SD) | DFI (Kg) (mean ± SD) | FCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | + | F | 12.11 ± 1.11 | 0.346 ± 0.02 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 1.51 |
| M | 13.17 ± 2.14 | 0.376 ± 0.04 | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 1.46 | ||
| 2 | + | F | 8.97 ± 1.53 | 0.256 ± 0.03 | 0.39 ± 0.04 | 1.97 |
| M | 11.73 ± 1.37 | 0.335 ± 0.02 | 0.41 ± 0.04 | 1.56 | ||
| 3 | - | F | 10.31 ± 2.27 | 0.295 ± 0.04 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 1.81 |
| M | 10.01 ± 1.70 | 0.286 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 1.71 | ||
| 4 | + | F | 11.69 ± 1.99 | 0.334 ± 0.04 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 1.87 |
| M | 11.15 ± 1.81 | 0.319 ± 0.03 | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 1.37 | ||
| 5 | - | F | 10.60 ± 2.04 | 0.303 ± 0.04 | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 1.59 |
| M | 11.68 ± 2.39 | 0.334 ± 0.04 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 1.59 | ||
A= Antibiotics (+): with antibiotics, (-): without antibiotics.
F: female, M: male,
Total Weight Gain (TWG), Daily Weight Gain (DWG), Daily Feed Intake (DFI), Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR).
N= 200 pigs, (100 Females,100 Male). Each mean based on 4 replicates with10 pigs per replicate, 20 males and 20 females per treatment.
There were no significant differences according to the Fisher´s protected least significant difference Test (P ≥ 0.05).
Dietary treatments included a basal diet supplemented with probiotic additives S. cerevisiae RC016 and K. marxianus VM004 (100 g, 1 × 1010 CFU/g, respectively), with or without antibiotics, and mixed per ton of the different growth phases diets. Pigs were fed ad libitum with the following treatments T1) basal diet with antibiotics (BD); T 2) BD with antibiotics + S. cerevisiae; T3) BD without antibiotics + S. cerevisiae; T4) BD with antibiotics +K. marxianus; T5) BD without antibiotics + K. marxianus.
Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RC016 and Kluyveromyces marxianus VM004 probiotic supplementation on carcass quality at the end of the experimental period
| 1 | + | 13.28 ± 1.02 | 50.5 ± 9.6 | 11.5 ± 2.1 | 10 ± 2.1c | 11.5 ± 0.7ab |
| 2 | + | 14.12 ± 0.85 | 52.0 ± 2.8 | 10.5 ± 1.5 | 4.2 ± 0.9a | 10.7 ± 1.7ab |
| 3 | - | 14.37 ± 0.68 | 55.5 ± 2.1 | 6.4 ± 1.2 | 4.7 ± 0.9a | 12.0 ± 1.2ab |
| 4 | + | 13.40 ± 0.45 | 55.0 ± 1.4 | 9.5 ± 1.5 | 7.7 ± 1.1b | 12.5 ± 1.1b |
| 5 | - | 12.21 ± 0.21 | 52.2 ± 3.5 | 7.2 ± 1.2 | 6.5 ± 1.0 b | 8.7 ± 1.2a |
a,b Values that differ significantly (P < 0.05) according to the Fisher´s protected least significant difference Test.
A= antibiotics (+): with antibiotics, (-): without antibiotics.
Dietary treatments included a basal diet supplemented with probiotic additives S. cerevisiae RC016 and K. marxianus VM004 (100 g, 1 × 1010 CFU/g, respectively), with or without antibiotics, and mixed per ton of the different growth phases diets. Pigs were fed ad libitum with the following treatments T1) basal diet with antibiotics (BD); T 2) BD with antibiotics + S. cerevisiae; T3) BD without antibiotics + S. cerevisiae; T4) BD with antibiotics + K. marxianus; T5) BD without antibiotics + K. marxianus.
N= 200 pigs, (100 Females,100 Male). Each mean based on 4 replicates with10 pigs per replicate, 20 males and 20 females per treatment.
Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RC016 and Kluyveromyces marxianus VM004 probiotics supplementation on clinical signs and macroscopic lesions scores at the end of the experimental period
| LA | RA | LM | RM | I | LC | RC | LD | LV | RD | RV | |||||
| 1 | + | 2 | 7 | 20 | 20 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 30 |
| 2 | + | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 10 | |
| 4 | + | 0 | 0 | 22 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 10 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 0 | |
There were no significant differences according to the Fisher´s protected least significant difference Test (P ≥ 0.05).
+ K. marxianus; T5) BD without antibiotics + K. marxianus.
Lung lesions (by lung lobe): left anterior lobe (LA); right anterior lobe (RA); left middle lobe (LM); right middle lobe (RM); intermediate lobe (I); left caudal lobe (LC); right caudal lobe (RD). Nasal turbinate (by turbinate): left dorsal turbinate (LD); left ventral turbinate (LV); right dorsal turbinate (RD); right ventral turbinate (RV).
A= Antibiotic (+): with antibiotics, (-): without antibiotics.
† Dietary treatments included a basal diet supplemented with probiotic additives S. cerevisiae RC016 and K. marxianus VM004 (100 g, 1 × 1010 CFU/g, respectively), with or without antibiotics, and mixed per ton of the different growth phases diets. Pigs were fed ad libitum with the following treatments T1) basal diet with antibiotics (BD); T 2) BD with antibiotics + S. cerevisiae; T3) BD without antibiotics + S. cerevisiae; T4) BD with antibiotics ‡ N= 200 pigs.