| Literature DB >> 35433906 |
Ryuji Araki1,2,3, Koji Iwanaga2, Kazunori Ueda1, Ayaka Shima4, Genki Ishihara4, Mitsuhiro Aizu4, Toshiharu Fukayama4, Mitsuhiro Isaka3.
Abstract
Myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) is the most common cause of congestive heart failure in dogs, and although complications of MMVD to the lungs and kidneys have been identified, complications to the gut are less well understood. The intestinal microbiota is an important factor in the gut, and although the association between heart disease and the intestinal microbiota has been shown in human medicine, it is unknown in dogs. The study aimed to evaluate the relationship between MMVD and gut microbiota. A total of 69 healthy Chihuahuas and Chihuahuas with MMVD were evaluated for cardiac health by echocardiography and chest radiography and grouped according to ACVIM guidelines. Fecal samples were collected from all cases and 16S rRNA sequencing was used to reveal the intestinal microbiota. There were significant differences in LA/Ao, LVIDd, E vel, VHS, and VLAS with the severity of ACVIM. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the diversity and composition of gut microbiota among the groups. The present study did not identify the effects of MMVD on the gut microbiota.Entities:
Keywords: Chihuahua; fractional shortening; intestinal complication; intestinal microbiota; myxomatous mitral valve disease
Year: 2022 PMID: 35433906 PMCID: PMC9007596 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.846492
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Patient characteristics of healthy Chihuahuas (H) and Chihuahuas with myxomatous mitral valve disease divided into three groups (B1, B2, and C/D).
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 7.3 ± 2.6 | 11.1 ± 2.5 | 12.0 ± 2.4 | 11.8 ± 1.9 |
| Sex (M/F) | 9/10 | 11/10 | 6/9 | 8/6 |
| Male/Casted male | 0/9 | 2/9 | 2/4 | 3/5 |
| Female/Spayed female | 0/10 | 0/10 | 1/8 | 1/5 |
| BW (kg) | 3.1 ± 1.2 | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 3.0 ± 0.9 | 3.1 ± 1.0 |
| Antibiotics | Nothing ( | Nothing ( | Nothing ( | Nothing ( |
| Comorbidities | CAD ( | CAD ( | CAD ( | CKD ( |
|
| ||||
| ACE-I | ||||
| Pimobendan | nothing | |||
| Loop-diuretics | nothing | nothing |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
BW, body weight; BCS, body condition score; CAD, canine atopic dermatitis; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ACE-I angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.
Patient diet data in healthy Chihuahuas (H) and Chihuahuas with myxomatous mitral valve disease divided into three groups (B1, B2, and C/D).
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Dry food, Royal canin, RENAL ( | Dry food, Royal canin, satiety renovation ( |
| Dry food, Royal canin, satiety renovation ( | Dry food, other companies, animal based ( |
| Dry food, Royal canin, Allergy ( | Dry food, Royal canin, Chihuahua 8 ( |
| Dry food, Royal canin, Urinary ( | Dry food, Royal canin, Gastrointestinal low fat ( |
| Dry food, Hill's, z/d ( | Dry food, other companies, animal based (n=6) |
| Dry food, other companies, animal based ( | Dry food, other companies, plant based ( |
| Dry food, other companies, plant based (n = 2) | Homemade food ( |
| Dry food, Royal canin, Skin support ( | Homemade food ( |
| Dry food, Royal canin, Chihuahua 8 ( | Dry food, Royal canin, RENAL ( |
| Dry food, Royal canin, Gastrointestinal low fat ( | Dry food, Royal canin, Gastrointestinal low fat ( |
| Dry food, Royal canin, Cardiac ( | Dry food, Royal canin, Neutered care ( |
| Dry food, Royal canin, satiety renovation ( | Dry food, Hill's, z/d ( |
| Dry food, Royal canin, RENAL ( | Dry food, other companies, animal based ( |
| Dry food, other companies, animal based ( | Homemade food ( |
Figure 1α-diversity: Shannon index based on operational taxonomic unit abundance of healthy Chihuahuas (H) and Chihuahuas with myxomatous mitral valve disease divided into three groups (B1, B2, and C/D).
Figure 2Abundances of taxa in the intestinal microbiota of healthy Chihuahuas (H) and Chihuahuas with myxomatous mitral valve disease divided into three groups (B1, B2, and C/D) (phylum level).
Echocardiographic and radiographic data in healthy Chihuahuas (H) and Chihuahuas with myxomatous mitral valve disease divided into three groups (B1, B2, and C/D).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA (mm) | 13.2 ± 2.2 | 15.2 ± 2.7 | 23.3 ± 6.1 b, d | 32.0 ± 7.4 c, e, f | <0.001 |
| Ao (mm) | 9.41 ± 1.0 | 10.2 ± 1.2 | 10.9 ± 1.3 b | 10.5 ± 1.3 c | 0.005 |
| LA/Ao | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.5 b, d | 3.1 ± 0.9 c, e, f | <0.001 |
| IVSDd (mm) | 5.2 ± 1.2 | 5.2 ± 0.8 | 4.6 ± 0.9 | 4.4 ± 1.2 | 0.062 |
| LVPWd (mm) | 5.4 ± 0.9 | 5.6 ± 1.0 | 5.1 ± 0.8 | 5.1 ± 1.2 | 0.292 |
| LVIDd (mm) | 17.0 ± 2.6 | 19.1 ± 3.4 | 25.5 ± 3.4 b, d | 27.5 ± 4.1 c, e | <0.001 |
| LVIDs (mm) | 10.8 ± 2.6 | 12.0 ± 2.2 | 14.1 ± 2.3 b | 15.5 ± 3.6 c, e | <0.001 |
| LVIDDN | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.1 b | 1.9 ± 0.2 c | <0.001 |
| E vel (m/s) | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.2 b | 1.3 ± 0.5 c, e, f | <0.001 |
| A vel (m/s) | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 a | 1.0 ± 0.2 b | 0.8 ± 0.3 | <0.001 |
| MR vel (m/s) | nothing | 5.7 ± 0.6 | 5.4 ± 0.5 | 5.3 ± 0.6 | 0.286 |
| FS (%) | 35.7 ± 6.3 | 36.0 ± 6.7 | 38.8 ± 12.9 | 44.4 ± 11.0 c | 0.037 |
| LVEF (%) | 68.3 ± 8.4 | 67.5 ± 7.6 | 72.0 ± 9.0 | 72.6 ± 11.7 | 0.338 |
| VHS (v) | 9.2 ± 0.9 | 9.4 ± 0.8 a | 10.6 ± 0.7 b, d | 11.5 ± 1.2 c, e, f | <0.001 |
| VLAS (v) | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.3 a | 3.1 ± 0.3 b, d | 3.8 ± 0.4 c, e, f | <0.001 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
LA, left atrium; Ao, aorta; LA/Ao, maximal diastolic left atrial body-to-aortic root diameter ratio in the right, parasternal, short-axis view of the heart base; IVSTd, interventricular septum thickness in diastole; LVPWd, left ventricular posterior wall thickness in diastole; LVIDd, left ventricular internal diameter in diastole; LVIDs, left ventricular internal diameter in systole; LVIDDN, left ventricular internal diameter in diastole, indexed to the bodyweight; E vel, early wave velocity; A vel, atrium wave velocity; MR vel; mitral regurgitation velocity; FS, shortening fraction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; VHS, vertebral heart score; VLAS, vertebral left atrial size.
P-value for all: Results of the overall ANOVA F-test.
Pairwise comparisons were made using the Tukey-Kramer test.
.