| Literature DB >> 35433749 |
Jingjing Ji1, Peng Su2, Wenyi Lin3, Leifang Ouyang1, Conglin Wang1, Jinxin Jia1, Zheying Liu1, Zhifeng Liu1.
Abstract
Background: Exertional heatstroke (EHS) remains a major problem for those who take strenuous physical activity. Inflammation and immune dysfunction were thought to be crucial to the pathophysiological process of heatstroke. The present study was aimed to investigate the dynamic changes of the immune cells in patients with EHS and determine their prognostic effects to provide the clinical evidence of the above process.Entities:
Keywords: exertional heatstroke; immune; lymphocyte; neutrophil; prognosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35433749 PMCID: PMC9011182 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.867774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
The dynamic change of immune cell counts in patients with exertional heatstroke (EHS).
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Ad | 11.36 [8.73, 14.60] | 11.44 [8.91, 14.51] | 10.44 [8.07, 15.45] | 0.860 |
| 24 h | 9.21 [6.79, 12.25] | 9.19 [6.70, 12.14] | 9.63 [8.36, 13.95] | 0.122 |
| 48 h | 8.13 [6.37, 10.28] | 7.97 [6.36, 9.93] | 10.08 [7.27, 13.95] | 0.025 |
| 72 h | 7.44 [5.89, 9.50] | 7.16 [5.87, 8.96] | 9.90 [7.50, 11.71] | 0.015 |
|
| ||||
| Ad | 8.86 [6.55, 12.41] | 9.01 [6.62, 12.23] | 8.72 [6.30, 13.18] | 0.952 |
| 24 h | 6.97 [4.81, 10.27] | 6.66 [4.54, 9.79] | 8.26 [7.44, 12.95] | 0.002 |
| 48 h | 6.04 [4.24, 8.57] | 5.79 [4.10, 7.77] | 8.60 [6.70, 12.95] | <0.001 |
| 72 h | 5.30 [4.05, 7.45] | 4.93 [3.96, 7.13] | 9.09 [6.12, 10.96] | 0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Ad | 1.12 [0.58, 1.90] | 1.13 [0.68, 1.86] | 0.64 [0.32, 2.46] | 0.164 |
| 24 h | 1.31 [0.82, 1.83] | 1.39 [1.05, 1.94] | 0.34 [0.29, 0.47] | <0.001 |
| 48 h | 1.30 [0.70, 1.87] | 1.36 [0.96, 1.95] | 0.34 [0.22, 0.41] | <0.001 |
| 72 h | 1.28 [0.70, 1.72] | 1.34 [0.87, 1.83] | 0.33 [0.23, 0.52] | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Ad | 0.68 [0.38, 0.99] | 0.68 [0.39, 1.00] | 0.68 [0.25, 0.84] | 0.45 |
| 24 h | 0.51 [0.32, 0.73] | 0.54 [0.35, 0.74] | 0.12 [0.08, 0.53] | <0.001 |
| 48 h | 0.43 [0.32, 0.61] | 0.44 [0.34, 0.62] | 0.29 [0.13, 0.40] | 0.003 |
| 72 h | 0.43 [0.32, 0.60] | 0.43 [0.32, 0.59] | 0.42 [0.18, 0.66] | 0.644 |
The dynamic changes of immune cell ratios and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios (NLR) in patients with EHS.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Ad | 84.15 [72.60, 88.02] | 84.10 [71.80, 87.80] | 84.20 [77.30, 91.10] | 0.364 |
| 24 h | 81.10 [72.27, 88.00] | 79.90 [71.90, 85.90] | 93.70 [90.20, 95.50] | <0.001 |
| 48 h | 76.10 [65.47, 87.08] | 73.50 [64.15, 83.45] | 94.50 [91.57, 95.58] | <0.001 |
| 72 h | 74.70 [64.03, 84.20] | 72.30 [62.20, 82.05] | 91.80 [85.25, 93.50] | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Ad | 8.80 [4.90, 18.50] | 9.30 [5.40, 18.60] | 7.70 [4.10, 16.10] | 0.3 |
| 24 h | 11.35 [6.50, 19.82] | 12.70 [7.70, 20.90] | 4.00 [2.80, 4.90] | <0.001 |
| 48 h | 16.20 [7.40, 25.22] | 17.75 [11.18, 26.13] | 3.05 [2.03, 4.07] | <0.001 |
| 72 h | 16.85 [8.20, 25.40] | 18.50 [10.80, 26.45] | 4.00 [2.50, 6.70] | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Ad | 5.90 [3.90, 7.70] | 6.00 [4.00, 7.70] | 5.00 [3.20, 8.80] | 0.71 |
| 24 h | 6.00 [4.00, 7.50] | 6.20 [4.60, 7.60] | 1.70 [1.00, 2.90] | <0.001 |
| 48 h | 5.70 [3.98, 7.50] | 6.05 [4.40, 7.53] | 2.25 [1.10, 4.02] | <0.001 |
| 72 h | 6.00 [4.70, 7.68] | 6.10 [4.95, 7.70] | 4.00 [2.95, 6.95] | 0.018 |
|
| ||||
| Ad | 9.05 [3.92, 17.72] | 8.97 [3.78, 16.51] | 12.45 [4.99, 23.68] | 0.187 |
| 24 h | 5.52 [2.94, 11.37] | 4.88 [2.62, 8.74] | 25.66 [20.50, 35.49] | <0.001 |
| 48 h | 4.88 [2.62, 12.36] | 4.02 [2.49, 7.39] | 28.78 [21.73, 44.78] | <0.001 |
| 72 h | 4.39 [2.54, 10.07] | 3.83 [2.40, 7.34] | 23.00 [12.27, 36.02] | <0.001 |
Figure 1Receiver operating characteristic curves of immune cell counts and ratios at admission (A) and at 24 h after admission (B) for 90-day fatality in patients with exertional heatstroke (EHS). WBC, white blood cell; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; AUC, area under curve.
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristic curves of immune cell counts and ratios at 48 h after admission (A) and at 72 h after admission (B) for 90-day fatality in patients with EHS. WBC, white blood cell; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; AUC, area under curve.
Figure 3A forest plot showed the effects of immune cell counts (A) and a ratio (B) on a prognosis of patients with EHS. WBC, white blood cell; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 4Nomogram for the predication on 14-day, 28-day, and 90-day prognoses of EHS (A) and calibration curves of 14-day (B), 28-day (C), and 90-day (D) of nomogram.