| Literature DB >> 35433458 |
Ruikun Liao1,2, Zhuoyue Tang1,2, Xiaojiao Li1,2, Liang Lv1, Chao Yang1,2, Hua Xiong1,2, Bi Zhou1,2, Jiayi Yu1,2, Dan Zhang1,2.
Abstract
Purposes: The purpose of this study was to explore the diagnostic performance of Cho peak area (Cho Are), Cho peak amplitude (Cho Amp), and the combined approach (Cho Are_Amp) in detecting rabbit VX2 liver cancer at the early stage via hydrogen-1 proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS), as well as the correlations between Cho Are, Cho Amp, and tumor parameters like diameter and volume.Entities:
Keywords: choline peak; liver cancer; magnetic resonance; proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; tumor size
Year: 2022 PMID: 35433458 PMCID: PMC9008714 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.846308
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence and hydrogen-1 proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) of liver cancer. The choline (Cho) peak at 3.22 ppm is significantly increased in liver VX2 tumor (A). The axial and coronal images of the tumor showed hypointensity on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and slightly hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) (B–D).
The mean values and standard deviations of tumor diameter, tumor volume, Cho Are, and Cho Amp in VX2 liver cancer (mean ± SD, n = 18).
| Index | Tumor diameter (cm) | Tumor volumeTumor diameter (cm3) | Cho Are | Cho Amp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | 3.082 ± 0.940 | 9.799 ± 6.319 | 42.461 ± 16.799 | 2.932 ± 1.305 |
Cho Are, choline peak area; Cho Amp, choline peak amplitude.
Figure 2Scatter plot represent positive correlations between Choline (Cho) peak area and tumor diameter (A), tumor volume (B), and Cho peak amplitude (C), respectively.
Figure 3Scatter plot represents positive correlations between Choline (Cho) peak amplitude and tumor diameter (A), tumor volume (B), and positive correlation between tumor diameter and tumor volume (C).
Diagnostic efficiency of Cho Are, Cho Amp, and Cho Are_Amp in VX2 liver cancer.
| Index | AUC | 95% CI | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cho Are | 0.807 | 0.002 | 0.657–0.957 | 0.833 | 0.778 |
| Cho Amp | 0.883 | 0.000 | 0.766–0.999 | 0.722 | 0.944 |
| Cho Are_Amp | 0.892 | 0.000 | 0.780–1.000 | 0.833 | 0.833 |
Cho, choline; Cho Are, choline peak area; Cho Amp, choline peak amplitude; Cho Are_Amp, choline peak area combined with choline peak amplitude.
Figure 4The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the diagnosis of liver cancer based on choline peak area (Cho Are), choline peak amplitude (Cho Amp), and choline peak area combined with choline peak amplitude (Cho Are_Amp).
Figure 5Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining showed that the nucleus was large and deeply stained, the heterotypic mitotic phase was visible, and no obvious necrosis was found (A). The structure of liver tissues was clear, and no obvious heterogeneity was found (B).