| Literature DB >> 35433147 |
B H Parameshwar Keerthi1, Shivaprasad G Savagave2, Anil K Sakalecha1, Vineela Reddy1, Yashas Ullas L2.
Abstract
Background and objective Knowledge about sphenoid sinus pneumatization is critical for skull base surgeries and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) in order to avoid serious complications like postoperative meningitis, sinusitis, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, and intracranial hematoma. In this study, we aimed to assess the proportion of anatomical variants in sphenoid sinus pneumatization and to determine the common sphenoid pneumatization pattern in a South Indian population. Methods This retrospective study was conducted over a period of six months from July 2019 to December 2019 among 573 patients who underwent non-contrast CT (NCCT) or contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) of the brain, paranasal sinuses (PNS), orbit, and face. Results Most of the patients were in the age group of 20-39 years. The male-to-female ratio was 2.45:1. Among the posterior extensions, the most common variant was type D, followed by type C, type B, and type A. Among the clival extensions, the most common variant was Cliv-A, followed by Cliv-B, Cliv-C, and Cliv-D. The most common lateral wall pneumatization was bilateral lateral wall pneumatization followed by unilateral sinus wall pneumatization. Lat-A was the most common lateral wall pneumatization pattern followed by Lat-D, Lat-B, and Lat-C. Conclusion Our study intends to classify the sphenoid sinus pneumatization pattern and identify the most common variant among them, thereby guiding the skull base and FESS surgeons in choosing the correct mode of the operative procedure and also anticipating and avoiding complications of surgery.Entities:
Keywords: clivus; computed tomography; lesser wing of sphenoid; paranasal sinuses; pneumatization; pre-sellar; pterygoid plates; sellar; sphenoid sinus
Year: 2022 PMID: 35433147 PMCID: PMC9009218 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Classification of the posterior extent of sellar pneumatization in the sphenoid sinus
CT bone window midsagittal sections showing the various types of sphenoid pneumatization. A: Conchal type; pneumatization (>10 mm) anterior to the anterior wall of sella. B: Presellar type; posterior margin of pneumatization anterior to the anterior wall of the sella. C: Incomplete sellar; posterior margin of pneumatization posterior to the anterior wall but anterior to the posterior wall of the sella. D: Complete sellar; pneumatization extends posteriorly to the posterior wall of the sella
CT: computed tomography
Figure 2Classification of craniocaudal extension of sellar pneumatization in the sphenoid sinus
CT bone window mid-sagittal sections showing the various types of sphenoid pneumatization. Horizontal lines are drawn along the inferior margin of the sella (green line) and the vidian canal (orange line). The vertical line is along the posterior wall of the sella (dotted white line). A: Pneumatization does not extend above the inferior margin of the sella or below the level of the vidian canal. B: Dorsal; pneumatization extending into the dorsum sella. C: Occipital; pneumatization that extends inferiorly to the vidian canal level. D: Combined; dorsal + occipital
CT: computed tomography
Figure 3Lateral and lesser wing pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus
Two lines are drawn along the medial margins of the foramen rotundum and the vidian canal (white dotted lines) on both sides. A: Pterygoid; pneumatization on both sides inferior to the vidian canal extending into the pterygoid process. B: Greater wing of the sphenoid; pneumatization extending laterally into the greater wing of sphenoid on both sides, beyond the foramen rotundum. Lesser wing; pneumatization extending into the bilateral anterior clinoid processes. C: Full lateral; pterygoid + lateral on both sides. Also noted is the lesser wing extension on the left side
Gender and age distribution
P>0.5; not significant
| Age (years) | Gender | Total | % | |
| Male, n (%) | Female, n (%) | |||
| <20 | 7 (1.22%) | 6 (1.05%) | 13 | 2.27 |
| 20-39 | 164 (28.62%) | 61 (10.65%) | 225 | 39.27 |
| 40-59 | 143 (24.96%) | 55 (9.6%) | 198 | 34.55 |
| 60-79 | 72 (12.57%) | 35 (6.11%) | 107 | 18.67 |
| 80-100 | 22 (3.84%) | 8 (1.4%) | 30 | 5.24 |
| Total | 407 (71%) | 166 (29%) | 573 | 100 |
Classification based on clival pneumatization
| Clival | Gender | ||
| Males | Females | Total | |
| No pneumatization | 170 | 85 | 255 |
| A | 154 | 60 | 214 |
| B | 56 | 12 | 68 |
| C | 12 | 7 | 19 |
| D | 15 | 2 | 17 |
| Total | 407 | 166 | 573 |
Classification based on lateral pneumatization
| Bilateral symmetrical (n = 162), n (%) | Bilateral asymmetrical (n = 78), n (%) | Unilateral (n = 237), n (%) | Total, n (%) | |
| Right | Left | |||
| A = 48 (10%) | A = 11 (2.3%) | A = 10 (2.1%) | A = 73 (15.3%) | A = 142 (29.7%) |
| B = 44 (9.3%) | B = 6 (1.2%) | B = 7 (1.5%) | B = 71 (14.8%) | B = 128 (26.8%) |
| C = 30 (6.3%) | C = 4 (0.9%) | C = 10 (2.1%) | C = 40 (8.3%) | C = 84 (17.6%) |
| D = 40 (8.4%) | D = 18 (3.7%) | D = 12 (2.5%) | D = 53 (11.1%) | D = 123 (25.7%) |
| 162 (33.9%) | 39 (8.1%) | 39 (8.1%) | 237 (49.9%) | 477 (100%) |