| Literature DB >> 35432919 |
Tushar Ranjan Dalei1, Barada Prasanna Samal1, Asish Kumar Gupta2, Rajesh Senapati1, Tarini Prasad Sahoo1.
Abstract
Neer's type II lateral end clavicle fracture is inherently unstable due to coraco-clavicular ligament disruption. Timely surgery can avoid complications of conservative management. Our study is based on open reduction and fixation with double endobutton and fibre tape in 12 patients. Radiological and functional outcome were assessed using Quick DASH score and SPADI score at regular interval. All the fractures achieved both clinical and radiological union. No intra-operative or post-operative complication was noted. Functional out come and range of motion at 1-year follow-up was quite satisfactory. Open reduction and fixation with double endobutton and fibre tape for lateral end clavicle fracture is a quite rewarding surgery with less steep learning curve, economical and enough stable fixations leading to union and good functional outcome without need of re-surgery for implant removal. Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: Neer’s type II lateral end clavicle fracture; endobutton and fibre tape; good functional outcome; minimal complication; open reduction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35432919 PMCID: PMC9010022 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjac120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Surg Case Rep ISSN: 2042-8812
Figure 2(A) After exposing coracoid a drill hole was made at the base Coracoid with 3.2-mm drill bit. (B) Fracture reduced and provisionally fixed with k wire and a Drill hole was made over clavicle medial to fracture. (C) Fibre tape entangled in endobutton passed through drill hole of coracoid and subsequently through a drill hole of clavicle with the help of 26G ss wire. (D) Final construct with second endobutton over clavicle and fibre tape tied followed by removal of k - wire.
Figure 1Pre op and 1-year follow-up X-ray image of Neer’s type II unstable lateral end clavicle fracture.
Epidemiology, clinical outcomes and range of motion at final follow-up
| Sl No | Age | Time to surgery(in days) | Surgery time (minutes) | QDASH score | SPADI SCORE | RANGE OF MOTION | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAIN | DISABILTY | COMBINED | FF | EXT | ABD | |||||
| 1 | 22 | 2 | 45 | 4.5 | 6 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 160 | 50 | 160 |
| 2 | 26 | 7 | 50 | 6.8 | 8 | 3.8 | 5.4 | 120 | 50 | 120 |
| 3 | 27 | 5 | 60 | 9.1 | 10 | 6.3 | 7.7 | 120 | 60 | 120 |
| 4 | 37 | 3 | 40 | 11.4 | 10 | 5 | 6.9 | 120 | 40 | 100 |
| 5 | 32 | 4 | 40 | 4.5 | 6 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 120 | 50 | 160 |
| 6 | 33 | 4 | 45 | 11.4 | 10 | 6.3 | 7.7 | 140 | 50 | 120 |
| 7 | 29 | 5 | 50 | 9.1 | 8 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 100 | 50 | 100 |
| 8 | 39 | 4 | 50 | 4.5 | 6 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 160 | 60 | 160 |
| 9 | 33 | 6 | 50 | 6.8 | 6 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 160 | 60 | 160 |
| 10 | 31 | 3 | 60 | 4.5 | 8 | 5 | 6.2 | 120 | 60 | 160 |
| 11 | 29 | 2 | 70 | 4.5 | 6 | 5 | 5.4 | 120 | 60 | 120 |
| 12 | 28 | 5 | 65 | 6.8 | 6 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 160 | 60 | 120 |